Ecological homogenization and convergence in urban ecosystems: A global synthesis of biotic, abiotic, and ecosystem dimensions

IF 5.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shih-Chieh Chien
{"title":"Ecological homogenization and convergence in urban ecosystems: A global synthesis of biotic, abiotic, and ecosystem dimensions","authors":"Shih-Chieh Chien","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban ecological homogenization and convergence describe the increasing similarity among cities in species composition and environmental conditions at both regional and global scales. Although widely used, these terms are inconsistently defined in the literature, contributing to mixed findings and limited clarity about their applications. This study addresses the issue by systematically reviewing 255 peer-reviewed publications, conducting a qualitative analysis of terminology usage, and applying a hierarchy-of-hypotheses framework to assess the support for urban ecological homogenization. The qualitative analysis of terminology use supports “ecological homogenization” as the most inclusive term, encompassing a broad scope of urban ecological patterns. Research on this topic has steadily grown from 1999 to 2024, yet geographic representation remains uneven, with regions such as Africa, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia underrepresented. To better understand the multifaceted nature of these concepts, this study categorized the literature into four dimensions: biotic, abiotic, ecosystem-level, and sociocultural. Within each, previous findings were synthesized across multiple spatial scales and habitat types. While 62 % of studies supported urban ecological homogenization or convergence, confirmation varied by scale and category, but not by terminology used. This synthesis identifies emerging research themes and offers recommendations for improving conceptual clarity and interdisciplinary integration. The findings provide a more holistic understanding of urban ecological change and inform urban planning and management, such as designing green spaces to preserve native biodiversity, mitigating soil and microclimate homogenization, and guiding infrastructure development to reduce ecological uniformity across cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100954"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725003757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban ecological homogenization and convergence describe the increasing similarity among cities in species composition and environmental conditions at both regional and global scales. Although widely used, these terms are inconsistently defined in the literature, contributing to mixed findings and limited clarity about their applications. This study addresses the issue by systematically reviewing 255 peer-reviewed publications, conducting a qualitative analysis of terminology usage, and applying a hierarchy-of-hypotheses framework to assess the support for urban ecological homogenization. The qualitative analysis of terminology use supports “ecological homogenization” as the most inclusive term, encompassing a broad scope of urban ecological patterns. Research on this topic has steadily grown from 1999 to 2024, yet geographic representation remains uneven, with regions such as Africa, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia underrepresented. To better understand the multifaceted nature of these concepts, this study categorized the literature into four dimensions: biotic, abiotic, ecosystem-level, and sociocultural. Within each, previous findings were synthesized across multiple spatial scales and habitat types. While 62 % of studies supported urban ecological homogenization or convergence, confirmation varied by scale and category, but not by terminology used. This synthesis identifies emerging research themes and offers recommendations for improving conceptual clarity and interdisciplinary integration. The findings provide a more holistic understanding of urban ecological change and inform urban planning and management, such as designing green spaces to preserve native biodiversity, mitigating soil and microclimate homogenization, and guiding infrastructure development to reduce ecological uniformity across cities.
城市生态系统的生态同质化和趋同:生物、非生物和生态系统维度的全球综合
城市生态同质化和趋同化描述了城市物种组成和环境条件在区域和全球尺度上的相似性。虽然这些术语被广泛使用,但在文献中定义不一致,导致研究结果不一,并且对其应用的清晰度有限。本研究通过系统地回顾255篇同行评议的出版物,对术语使用进行定性分析,并应用假设层次框架来评估对城市生态同质化的支持,从而解决了这个问题。术语使用的定性分析支持“生态同质化”作为最具包容性的术语,涵盖了广泛的城市生态模式。从1999年到2024年,关于这一主题的研究稳步增长,但地域代表性仍然不均衡,非洲、中亚和东南亚等地区的代表性不足。为了更好地理解这些概念的多面性,本研究将文献分为四个维度:生物、非生物、生态系统水平和社会文化。在每一项研究中,之前的发现都是在多个空间尺度和栖息地类型上综合的。虽然62%的研究支持城市生态同质化或趋同,但证实程度因规模和类别而异,但所用术语不同。这一综合确定了新兴的研究主题,并为提高概念清晰度和跨学科整合提供了建议。研究结果为城市生态变化提供了更全面的理解,并为城市规划和管理提供了信息,例如设计绿色空间以保护本地生物多样性,缓解土壤和小气候同质化,指导基础设施建设以减少城市生态均一性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信