Home bias, sovereign-bank nexus and bank failure – Evidence from European stress tests

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Dominik Meyland , Dorothea Schäfer
{"title":"Home bias, sovereign-bank nexus and bank failure – Evidence from European stress tests","authors":"Dominik Meyland ,&nbsp;Dorothea Schäfer","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes a new way to clarify the relationship between the sovereign-bank nexus and an individual bank’s home bias by employing stress test data from Europe’s most important banks. We use the individual bank’s likelihood to fail in achieving a minimum capital ratio threshold as the dependent variable in a cross-sectional logistic regression approach and compute marginal effects. In further contrast to previous studies, we simulate the application of risk weights to sovereign exposure. We obtain three key findings: (1) Higher bank capital thresholds tend to render the impact of the home country’s default risk on bank failure insignificant. (2) Home country risk and home bias work in opposite directions with the latter often decreasing a bank’s failure risk instead of increasing it. (3) With simulated capital requirements for sovereign exposure, the failure risk-decreasing effect of a home bias is preserved if not strengthened.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 104594"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925006817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes a new way to clarify the relationship between the sovereign-bank nexus and an individual bank’s home bias by employing stress test data from Europe’s most important banks. We use the individual bank’s likelihood to fail in achieving a minimum capital ratio threshold as the dependent variable in a cross-sectional logistic regression approach and compute marginal effects. In further contrast to previous studies, we simulate the application of risk weights to sovereign exposure. We obtain three key findings: (1) Higher bank capital thresholds tend to render the impact of the home country’s default risk on bank failure insignificant. (2) Home country risk and home bias work in opposite directions with the latter often decreasing a bank’s failure risk instead of increasing it. (3) With simulated capital requirements for sovereign exposure, the failure risk-decreasing effect of a home bias is preserved if not strengthened.
本土偏见、主权银行关系和银行倒闭——来自欧洲压力测试的证据
本文提出了一种新的方法,通过使用欧洲最重要银行的压力测试数据,来澄清主权银行关系与单个银行的本土偏好之间的关系。我们使用单个银行未能达到最低资本比率阈值的可能性作为横断面逻辑回归方法中的因变量,并计算边际效应。与之前的研究相比,我们模拟了风险权重对主权敞口的应用。我们得到了三个主要发现:(1)较高的银行资本门槛倾向于使母国违约风险对银行倒闭的影响不显著。(2)母国风险和母国偏见的作用方向相反,后者往往会降低而不是增加银行的倒闭风险。(3)在主权风险敞口的模拟资本要求下,本土偏好的失效风险降低效应即使没有增强,也得以保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信