{"title":"Integrating environmental ethics into climate change adaptation policies in Bangladesh: a narrative review","authors":"Tasnim Nazira Rida","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2025.100748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines how environmental ethics are integrated into Bangladesh’s climate change adaptation policies, with a focus on the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) 2023–2050 and the Bangladesh Delta Plan (BDP) 2100. Using a narrative review methodology grounded in moral philosophy, the study applies key ethical frameworks including distributive, procedural, and intergenerational justice, the precautionary principle, ecological stewardship, and biocentric and ecocentric perspectives drawn from UNESCO and COMEST declarations to assess the ethical orientation of these policies. The analysis reveals that the NAP places stronger emphasis on participatory justice, gender and social inclusion, and ecosystem-based adaptation, indicating a gradual shift toward biocentric and ecocentric approaches. In contrast, the BDP 2100 reflects a predominantly technocratic and anthropocentric framing, privileging infrastructure and economic growth while only conditionally recognizing ecological integrity and intergenerational responsibility. Both documents highlight progress in embedding ethical considerations but show gaps in enforceability, indigenous knowledge integration, and accountability mechanisms. Limitations of this study stem from its reliance on document-based analysis rather than field validation; future research should incorporate stakeholder engagement and ethical audits of policy implementation. Overall, the core finding is that while Bangladesh’s climate policies increasingly acknowledge ethical imperatives, their normative integration remains uneven, underscoring the urgent need for enforceable ethical safeguards to achieve climate governance that is equitable, sustainable, and morally coherent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54226,"journal":{"name":"Climate Risk Management","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100748"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096325000622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines how environmental ethics are integrated into Bangladesh’s climate change adaptation policies, with a focus on the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) 2023–2050 and the Bangladesh Delta Plan (BDP) 2100. Using a narrative review methodology grounded in moral philosophy, the study applies key ethical frameworks including distributive, procedural, and intergenerational justice, the precautionary principle, ecological stewardship, and biocentric and ecocentric perspectives drawn from UNESCO and COMEST declarations to assess the ethical orientation of these policies. The analysis reveals that the NAP places stronger emphasis on participatory justice, gender and social inclusion, and ecosystem-based adaptation, indicating a gradual shift toward biocentric and ecocentric approaches. In contrast, the BDP 2100 reflects a predominantly technocratic and anthropocentric framing, privileging infrastructure and economic growth while only conditionally recognizing ecological integrity and intergenerational responsibility. Both documents highlight progress in embedding ethical considerations but show gaps in enforceability, indigenous knowledge integration, and accountability mechanisms. Limitations of this study stem from its reliance on document-based analysis rather than field validation; future research should incorporate stakeholder engagement and ethical audits of policy implementation. Overall, the core finding is that while Bangladesh’s climate policies increasingly acknowledge ethical imperatives, their normative integration remains uneven, underscoring the urgent need for enforceable ethical safeguards to achieve climate governance that is equitable, sustainable, and morally coherent.
期刊介绍:
Climate Risk Management publishes original scientific contributions, state-of-the-art reviews and reports of practical experience on the use of knowledge and information regarding the consequences of climate variability and climate change in decision and policy making on climate change responses from the near- to long-term.
The concept of climate risk management refers to activities and methods that are used by individuals, organizations, and institutions to facilitate climate-resilient decision-making. Its objective is to promote sustainable development by maximizing the beneficial impacts of climate change responses and minimizing negative impacts across the full spectrum of geographies and sectors that are potentially affected by the changing climate.