Differences in High-Frequency Connectivity Among Large-Scale Functional Networks Linked to Major Depressive Disorder and Treatment-Resistant Depression

IF 3.7 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Ty Lees , Sarah E. Woronko , Mohan Li , Jason N. Scott Jr. , Manuel Kuhn , Shiba M. Esfand , Mario Bogdanov , Brian W. Boyle , Samantha R. Linton , Lauren R. Borchers , Peter Zhukovsky , Courtney Miller , Paula Bolton , Shuang Li , Robert C. Meisner , Diego A. Pizzagalli
{"title":"Differences in High-Frequency Connectivity Among Large-Scale Functional Networks Linked to Major Depressive Disorder and Treatment-Resistant Depression","authors":"Ty Lees ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Woronko ,&nbsp;Mohan Li ,&nbsp;Jason N. Scott Jr. ,&nbsp;Manuel Kuhn ,&nbsp;Shiba M. Esfand ,&nbsp;Mario Bogdanov ,&nbsp;Brian W. Boyle ,&nbsp;Samantha R. Linton ,&nbsp;Lauren R. Borchers ,&nbsp;Peter Zhukovsky ,&nbsp;Courtney Miller ,&nbsp;Paula Bolton ,&nbsp;Shuang Li ,&nbsp;Robert C. Meisner ,&nbsp;Diego A. Pizzagalli","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have each been characterized by altered neural connectivity largely associated with the triple model of the default mode (DMN), frontoparietal (FPN), and salience (SN) networks. However, the direction (i.e., hyper- vs. hypoconnectivity) and the specificity (i.e., depression broadly vs. TRD) of these alterations remains unclear. Thus, in the current study, we compared high-frequency between- and within-network resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in healthy control (HC) individuals, individuals with MDD, and individuals with TRD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ninety-six channel resting-state electroencephalogram data were collected from 34 participants with MDD (22 women, mean ± SD age: 29.92 ± 9.57 years), 24 participants with TRD (16 women, age: 44.35 ± 15.86 years), and 34 HC participants (25 women, age: 32.49 ± 14.07 years). Based on previous findings, exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography was used to estimate theta and beta rsFC within and between the DMN, FPN, and SN.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants with depression (i.e., pooled MDD and TRD participants) had enhanced within-DMN beta1 (12.5–18 Hz) connectivity compared with controls. Compared with MDD participants, participants with TRD showed increased within-DMN, DMN to FPN, and FPN to SN beta3 (21.5–30 Hz) connectivity. These effects persisted when controlling for current depressive symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Differences in high-frequency rsFC, particularly in the beta bands, among the DMN, FPN, and SN may partially account for neural mechanisms of treatment resistance. However, future work probing the heterogeneity (e.g., medication status, age of onset, lifetime episode count) and time course (e.g., length and frequency of episodes) of depression is needed to increase our understanding of these changes in neural connectivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"5 6","pages":"Article 100602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174325001569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have each been characterized by altered neural connectivity largely associated with the triple model of the default mode (DMN), frontoparietal (FPN), and salience (SN) networks. However, the direction (i.e., hyper- vs. hypoconnectivity) and the specificity (i.e., depression broadly vs. TRD) of these alterations remains unclear. Thus, in the current study, we compared high-frequency between- and within-network resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in healthy control (HC) individuals, individuals with MDD, and individuals with TRD.

Methods

Ninety-six channel resting-state electroencephalogram data were collected from 34 participants with MDD (22 women, mean ± SD age: 29.92 ± 9.57 years), 24 participants with TRD (16 women, age: 44.35 ± 15.86 years), and 34 HC participants (25 women, age: 32.49 ± 14.07 years). Based on previous findings, exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography was used to estimate theta and beta rsFC within and between the DMN, FPN, and SN.

Results

Participants with depression (i.e., pooled MDD and TRD participants) had enhanced within-DMN beta1 (12.5–18 Hz) connectivity compared with controls. Compared with MDD participants, participants with TRD showed increased within-DMN, DMN to FPN, and FPN to SN beta3 (21.5–30 Hz) connectivity. These effects persisted when controlling for current depressive symptoms.

Conclusions

Differences in high-frequency rsFC, particularly in the beta bands, among the DMN, FPN, and SN may partially account for neural mechanisms of treatment resistance. However, future work probing the heterogeneity (e.g., medication status, age of onset, lifetime episode count) and time course (e.g., length and frequency of episodes) of depression is needed to increase our understanding of these changes in neural connectivity.
与重度抑郁症和难治性抑郁症相关的大型功能网络中高频连接的差异
重度抑郁症(MDD)和治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)的特征都是神经连通性的改变,这在很大程度上与默认模式(DMN)、额顶叶(FPN)和显著性(SN)网络的三重模型有关。然而,这些改变的方向(即超连通性与低连通性)和特异性(即广义抑郁与TRD)仍不清楚。因此,在本研究中,我们比较了健康对照(HC)个体、MDD个体和TRD个体的网络间和网络内静息状态功能连接(rsFC)的高频。方法收集34例重度抑郁症患者(22例女性,平均±SD年龄:29.92±9.57岁)、24例TRD患者(16例女性,年龄:44.35±15.86岁)和34例HC患者(25例女性,年龄:32.49±14.07岁)的96个通道静息状态脑电图数据。基于先前的研究结果,精确的低分辨率电磁层析成像被用于估计DMN、FPN和SN内部和之间的θ和β rsFC。结果与对照组相比,抑郁症参与者(即合并MDD和TRD参与者)的dmn β 1 (12.5-18 Hz)连通性增强。与MDD参与者相比,TRD参与者表现出DMN内、DMN到FPN、FPN到SN β 3 (21.5-30 Hz)的连通性增加。当控制当前的抑郁症状时,这些效果仍然存在。结论DMN、FPN和SN之间高频rsFC的差异,特别是β波段的差异可能部分解释了治疗耐药的神经机制。然而,未来的工作需要探索抑郁症的异质性(例如,药物状况、发病年龄、一生发作次数)和时间过程(例如,发作的长度和频率),以增加我们对神经连接这些变化的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological psychiatry global open science
Biological psychiatry global open science Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信