Differentiating dog-park visitors: Motivational market segments within an urban green system

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ingrid E. Schneider , Megha Budruk , Arne Arnberger , Sonja Wilhelm Stanis
{"title":"Differentiating dog-park visitors: Motivational market segments within an urban green system","authors":"Ingrid E. Schneider ,&nbsp;Megha Budruk ,&nbsp;Arne Arnberger ,&nbsp;Sonja Wilhelm Stanis","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dog parks are one of the fastest growing urban park segments in the United States and beyond. Despite this growth, dog park and associated visitor research remains scant. Given the proliferation of dog parks in the urban landscape and the ongoing land use and design challenges they present, it seems prudent to discern differences among dog-park users. This explorative study differentiated dog-park permit holders of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA to inform green space planning and management. Dog-park permit holders were sent an electronic invitation to complete a questionnaire and a single reminder that yielded a 30 % response rate (n = 2059). Descriptive, factor, cluster, and comparative analysis revealed four motivation-based clusters that differed by place attachment, constraint factors, visitation frequency and willingness to travel to a dog park. Constraints to dog-park visitation were relatively low and consistent with ‘nature social enthusiasts’ more constrained by dog-health status, while both ‘nature social enthusiasts’ and ‘solitary dog visitors’ were constrained by rules, likely due to their significantly higher visitation and exposure to them than the other two segments. All visitors were willing to travel at least twice the distance to a dog-park than their current trip, which can inform typical travel routes and system needs. The heterogeneity suggests the necessity and opportunity to engage across segments to inform planning and design. Further, the diverse desires for socialization and solitude inform immediate design opportunities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129077"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886672500411X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dog parks are one of the fastest growing urban park segments in the United States and beyond. Despite this growth, dog park and associated visitor research remains scant. Given the proliferation of dog parks in the urban landscape and the ongoing land use and design challenges they present, it seems prudent to discern differences among dog-park users. This explorative study differentiated dog-park permit holders of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA to inform green space planning and management. Dog-park permit holders were sent an electronic invitation to complete a questionnaire and a single reminder that yielded a 30 % response rate (n = 2059). Descriptive, factor, cluster, and comparative analysis revealed four motivation-based clusters that differed by place attachment, constraint factors, visitation frequency and willingness to travel to a dog park. Constraints to dog-park visitation were relatively low and consistent with ‘nature social enthusiasts’ more constrained by dog-health status, while both ‘nature social enthusiasts’ and ‘solitary dog visitors’ were constrained by rules, likely due to their significantly higher visitation and exposure to them than the other two segments. All visitors were willing to travel at least twice the distance to a dog-park than their current trip, which can inform typical travel routes and system needs. The heterogeneity suggests the necessity and opportunity to engage across segments to inform planning and design. Further, the diverse desires for socialization and solitude inform immediate design opportunities.
区分狗公园游客:城市绿色系统中的激励市场细分
狗狗公园是美国及其他地区发展最快的城市公园之一。尽管有这样的增长,狗公园和相关的游客研究仍然很少。鉴于狗狗公园在城市景观中的扩散,以及它们所带来的持续的土地使用和设计挑战,区分狗狗公园使用者之间的差异似乎是明智的。本探索性研究对美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波里斯市的狗公园许可证持有者进行了区分,为绿地规划和管理提供信息。狗公园许可证持有人收到一份电子邀请,请他们填写一份问卷和一份提醒,回复率为30% % (n = 2059)。描述性分析、因子分析、聚类分析和比较分析揭示了四个基于动机的聚类,它们在地点依恋、约束因素、访问频率和前往狗公园的意愿方面存在差异。“自然社会爱好者”受狗的健康状况限制更大,而“自然社会爱好者”和“孤独的狗游客”都受到规则的限制,这可能是因为他们的访问次数和接触次数明显高于其他两类人。所有的游客都愿意比他们目前的行程至少多走一倍的距离去狗公园,这可以为典型的旅行路线和系统需求提供信息。这种异质性表明了跨部门参与规划和设计的必要性和机会。此外,对社交和独处的不同需求也为设计提供了直接的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信