Developing a riverbank erosion susceptibility index: A pragmatic approach to reveal the level of vulnerability in coastal Bangladesh

Arabe Khan , Md Mahmudul Hasan Rakib , Irteja Hasan , Apurba Roy , Mehedi Hasan Ovi , Md Mostafa Jaman Rabby , Raian Islam Evan , Nusrat Jahan Suborna , Maksudur Rahman , Rahat Khan , Dhiman Kumer Roy
{"title":"Developing a riverbank erosion susceptibility index: A pragmatic approach to reveal the level of vulnerability in coastal Bangladesh","authors":"Arabe Khan ,&nbsp;Md Mahmudul Hasan Rakib ,&nbsp;Irteja Hasan ,&nbsp;Apurba Roy ,&nbsp;Mehedi Hasan Ovi ,&nbsp;Md Mostafa Jaman Rabby ,&nbsp;Raian Islam Evan ,&nbsp;Nusrat Jahan Suborna ,&nbsp;Maksudur Rahman ,&nbsp;Rahat Khan ,&nbsp;Dhiman Kumer Roy","doi":"10.1016/j.geogeo.2025.100459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Riverbank erosion is one of the significant natural hazards affecting the livelihoods of communities living along riverbanks in Bangladesh. This study develops a novel riverbank erosion susceptibility index (RESI) to quantitatively assess community susceptibility to this hazard. The RESI framework integrates five core dimensions: exposure, susceptibility, sensitivity, adaptability, and resilience, encompassing 34 context-specific indicators derived from household surveys, interviews, and field observations. The RESI scoring scale ranges from -1 (most resilient) to +1 (most susceptible), where higher positive scores indicate greater susceptibility to riverbank erosion. The findings in this study conclude that Chadpur Union is the most susceptible (RESI score: 0.47), followed by Shambupur (0.36) and Chanchra (0.29) union. These scores are further validated with historical remote-sensing analysis, and sensitivity tests show that varying indicator weights (equal, expert, or PCA) do not change the relative union ranking, underscoring the model’s robustness. The analysis highlights key drivers of vulnerability: frequent erosion occurrences, high population density along riverbanks, considerable losses in land and assets, and recurrent displacement due to erosion. All three unions are facing significant challenges in building adaptability and resilience, as indicated by low scores in infrastructure, financial resources, and social support systems. The study emphasizes the need for targeted interventions to reduce susceptibility, which include reinforcing protective structures, improving access to financial and technical resources, and promoting livelihood diversification strategies. Integrating the RESI into planning enables decision-makers to prioritize high-risk areas and allocate resources more effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100582,"journal":{"name":"Geosystems and Geoenvironment","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosystems and Geoenvironment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772883825001074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Riverbank erosion is one of the significant natural hazards affecting the livelihoods of communities living along riverbanks in Bangladesh. This study develops a novel riverbank erosion susceptibility index (RESI) to quantitatively assess community susceptibility to this hazard. The RESI framework integrates five core dimensions: exposure, susceptibility, sensitivity, adaptability, and resilience, encompassing 34 context-specific indicators derived from household surveys, interviews, and field observations. The RESI scoring scale ranges from -1 (most resilient) to +1 (most susceptible), where higher positive scores indicate greater susceptibility to riverbank erosion. The findings in this study conclude that Chadpur Union is the most susceptible (RESI score: 0.47), followed by Shambupur (0.36) and Chanchra (0.29) union. These scores are further validated with historical remote-sensing analysis, and sensitivity tests show that varying indicator weights (equal, expert, or PCA) do not change the relative union ranking, underscoring the model’s robustness. The analysis highlights key drivers of vulnerability: frequent erosion occurrences, high population density along riverbanks, considerable losses in land and assets, and recurrent displacement due to erosion. All three unions are facing significant challenges in building adaptability and resilience, as indicated by low scores in infrastructure, financial resources, and social support systems. The study emphasizes the need for targeted interventions to reduce susceptibility, which include reinforcing protective structures, improving access to financial and technical resources, and promoting livelihood diversification strategies. Integrating the RESI into planning enables decision-makers to prioritize high-risk areas and allocate resources more effectively.

Abstract Image

开发河岸侵蚀敏感性指数:揭示孟加拉国沿海地区脆弱性水平的实用方法
河岸侵蚀是影响孟加拉国沿河社区生计的重大自然灾害之一。本文提出了一种新的河岸侵蚀敏感性指数(RESI)来定量评价群落对河岸侵蚀的易感性。RESI框架整合了五个核心维度:暴露、易感性、敏感性、适应性和复原力,包括34个根据家庭调查、访谈和实地观察得出的具体情况指标。RESI评分范围从-1(最具弹性)到+1(最易受影响),越高的正分数表明越容易受到河岸侵蚀。本研究结果表明,Chadpur工会最易受感染(RESI得分:0.47),其次是Shambupur工会(0.36)和Chanchra工会(0.29)。这些分数通过历史遥感分析进一步验证,敏感性测试表明,不同的指标权重(平等,专家,或PCA)不会改变相对联合排名,强调模型的鲁棒性。该分析强调了脆弱性的主要驱动因素:频繁发生侵蚀、河岸人口密度高、土地和资产的大量损失以及侵蚀导致的经常性流离失所。从基础设施、财政资源和社会支持系统的低得分可以看出,这三个工会在建立适应性和弹性方面都面临着重大挑战。该研究强调需要有针对性的干预措施来降低易感性,其中包括加强保护结构,改善获得财政和技术资源的机会,以及促进生计多样化战略。将RESI纳入规划,使决策者能够优先考虑高风险领域,并更有效地分配资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信