Hypothetical feed conversion efficiency of cultured meat compared to conventional animal production

IF 8.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
D. Lanzoni , I. Givens , C. Giromini
{"title":"Hypothetical feed conversion efficiency of cultured meat compared to conventional animal production","authors":"D. Lanzoni ,&nbsp;I. Givens ,&nbsp;C. Giromini","doi":"10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The pressure on agro-livestock systems calls for a critical review of production systems focusing on efficiency and sustainability. Cultured meat (CM) emerges as an alternative production but requires comparable parameters for evaluation. This paper proposes a hypothetical reformulation of the concept of Feed Conversion Rate (FCR) and Edible Meat ConversionRate (EMCR), traditionally employed in animal-derived food production, by adapting it to the context of cellular agriculture, in particular to CM. After an analysis of the FCR in the main conventional sectors (poultry, swine, cattle and fish), used for the calculation of EMCR, a theoretical model was developed for the calculation of the Cultured Meat Conversion Ratio (CMCR), based on the chemical composition of the culture media. The estimated CMCRs (0.316–0.687) and the CMCR on a dry matter basis for CM (2.29) were lower than those reported for traditional animal supply chains, indicating a potentially higher theoretical efficiency. However, these estimates do not account for the specific resources required to produce the ingredients of the culture medium, the actual metabolic efficiency of the cells, the accumulation of toxic metabolites (e.g., ammonia, lactate), nor the potential impact of future media formulations based on alternatives to foetal bovine serum. Although a theoretical calculation, this study provides a useful conceptual framework for the definition and optimisation of FCR in alternative cell culture systems, laying the basis for the development of reliable metrics in cellular agriculture and comparative evaluation between innovative and conventional food systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34474,"journal":{"name":"Future Foods","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100767"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833525002266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pressure on agro-livestock systems calls for a critical review of production systems focusing on efficiency and sustainability. Cultured meat (CM) emerges as an alternative production but requires comparable parameters for evaluation. This paper proposes a hypothetical reformulation of the concept of Feed Conversion Rate (FCR) and Edible Meat ConversionRate (EMCR), traditionally employed in animal-derived food production, by adapting it to the context of cellular agriculture, in particular to CM. After an analysis of the FCR in the main conventional sectors (poultry, swine, cattle and fish), used for the calculation of EMCR, a theoretical model was developed for the calculation of the Cultured Meat Conversion Ratio (CMCR), based on the chemical composition of the culture media. The estimated CMCRs (0.316–0.687) and the CMCR on a dry matter basis for CM (2.29) were lower than those reported for traditional animal supply chains, indicating a potentially higher theoretical efficiency. However, these estimates do not account for the specific resources required to produce the ingredients of the culture medium, the actual metabolic efficiency of the cells, the accumulation of toxic metabolites (e.g., ammonia, lactate), nor the potential impact of future media formulations based on alternatives to foetal bovine serum. Although a theoretical calculation, this study provides a useful conceptual framework for the definition and optimisation of FCR in alternative cell culture systems, laying the basis for the development of reliable metrics in cellular agriculture and comparative evaluation between innovative and conventional food systems.
假设养殖肉与传统动物生产的饲料转化效率
农牧业系统面临的压力要求对生产系统进行严格审查,重点是效率和可持续性。培养肉(CM)作为一种替代产品出现,但需要可比较的参数进行评估。本文提出了饲料转化率(FCR)和可食用肉类转化率(EMCR)概念的假设重新制定,传统上用于动物源性食品生产,通过使其适应细胞农业的背景,特别是CM。在分析了用于计算EMCR的主要传统部门(家禽、猪、牛和鱼)的FCR之后,根据培养基的化学成分,开发了计算培养肉转化率(CMCR)的理论模型。CM的估算CMCR(0.316-0.687)和基于干物质的CMCR(2.29)低于传统动物供应链的报告,表明理论效率可能更高。然而,这些估计并没有考虑到生产培养基成分所需的特定资源、细胞的实际代谢效率、有毒代谢物(如氨、乳酸)的积累,也没有考虑到未来基于胎牛血清替代品的培养基配方的潜在影响。虽然是一个理论计算,但本研究为替代细胞培养系统中FCR的定义和优化提供了一个有用的概念框架,为细胞农业中可靠指标的发展以及创新和传统食物系统之间的比较评估奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Future Foods
Future Foods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Foods is a specialized journal that is dedicated to tackling the challenges posed by climate change and the need for sustainability in the realm of food production. The journal recognizes the imperative to transform current food manufacturing and consumption practices to meet the dietary needs of a burgeoning global population while simultaneously curbing environmental degradation. The mission of Future Foods is to disseminate research that aligns with the goal of fostering the development of innovative technologies and alternative food sources to establish more sustainable food systems. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed articles that contribute to the advancement of sustainable food practices. Abstracting and indexing: Scopus Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) SNIP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信