Font of innovation or algorithmic deforestation? The ecosystem impacts of artificial intelligence in entrepreneurship

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Richard A. Hunt , Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu
{"title":"Font of innovation or algorithmic deforestation? The ecosystem impacts of artificial intelligence in entrepreneurship","authors":"Richard A. Hunt ,&nbsp;Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in the infrastructures, practices, and decision-making routines of founders, firms, and entrepreneurial ecosystems. For entrepreneurship, this appears to be a tremendous boon to value creation. By widening the aperture of individual entrepreneurs beyond the narrow limits of human cognition, assistive algorithms – and particularly the ground-breaking, readily accessible capabilities of Generative AI (Gen AI) – appear poised to deliver game-changing exploratory tools, enhanced predictive insights, operational efficiencies, and resource-preserving decision-support tools. Yet, the long-term, society-wide impacts are far less clear. One cause for concern is the variance-minimizing features of AI, a foundational design principle that reduces deviation and enhances the predictive stability of AI tools. In this, we identify a paradox wherein AI tools often enhance the individual creativity of entrepreneurs but, at scale, may erode collective entrepreneurial dynamism by filtering out non-algorithmic, highly serendipitous, mutation-generating, and variance-maximizing behaviors. Drawing upon the principles of <em>rainforest logics</em>, we theorize how AI's growing influence on entrepreneurial judgment, strategy, and ecosystem design may lead to a system-wide homogenization in decision-making and a decline in radical experimentation. With this, there is the danger of a corresponding increase in what we have dubbed <em>algorithmic deforestation</em>, involving systemic risks to the vitality and mutation-generating capacity of entrepreneurial ecosystems through the unintentional suppression of cognitive and behavioral diversity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article e00575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673425000629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in the infrastructures, practices, and decision-making routines of founders, firms, and entrepreneurial ecosystems. For entrepreneurship, this appears to be a tremendous boon to value creation. By widening the aperture of individual entrepreneurs beyond the narrow limits of human cognition, assistive algorithms – and particularly the ground-breaking, readily accessible capabilities of Generative AI (Gen AI) – appear poised to deliver game-changing exploratory tools, enhanced predictive insights, operational efficiencies, and resource-preserving decision-support tools. Yet, the long-term, society-wide impacts are far less clear. One cause for concern is the variance-minimizing features of AI, a foundational design principle that reduces deviation and enhances the predictive stability of AI tools. In this, we identify a paradox wherein AI tools often enhance the individual creativity of entrepreneurs but, at scale, may erode collective entrepreneurial dynamism by filtering out non-algorithmic, highly serendipitous, mutation-generating, and variance-maximizing behaviors. Drawing upon the principles of rainforest logics, we theorize how AI's growing influence on entrepreneurial judgment, strategy, and ecosystem design may lead to a system-wide homogenization in decision-making and a decline in radical experimentation. With this, there is the danger of a corresponding increase in what we have dubbed algorithmic deforestation, involving systemic risks to the vitality and mutation-generating capacity of entrepreneurial ecosystems through the unintentional suppression of cognitive and behavioral diversity.
创新的源泉还是算法的滥伐?人工智能对创业生态系统的影响
人工智能(AI)越来越多地嵌入到创始人、公司和创业生态系统的基础设施、实践和决策程序中。对于企业家来说,这似乎是价值创造的巨大福音。通过扩大个体企业家的视野,超越人类认知的狭隘限制,辅助算法——尤其是突破性的、容易获得的生成式人工智能(Gen AI)的能力——似乎准备好提供改变游戏规则的探索工具,增强预测洞察力,运营效率,以及节约资源的决策支持工具。然而,其对整个社会的长期影响远不那么明显。值得关注的一个原因是人工智能的方差最小化特性,这是一种基本的设计原则,可以减少偏差并提高人工智能工具的预测稳定性。在这方面,我们发现了一个悖论,即人工智能工具通常会增强企业家的个人创造力,但在规模上,可能会过滤掉非算法、高度偶然、产生突变和方差最大化的行为,从而削弱集体创业活力。根据热带雨林逻辑的原则,我们将人工智能对企业判断、战略和生态系统设计的影响越来越大,这可能导致整个系统的决策同质化,并导致激进实验的减少。这样一来,我们称之为“算法毁林”的危险就会相应增加,通过无意中抑制认知和行为多样性,对创业生态系统的活力和产生突变的能力构成系统性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信