Diastolic blood pressure as a predictor of short-term mortality in infective endocarditis

IF 2.1 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Su-ling Du , Jing-wen Li , Ying Chen , Xue-biao Wei , Yan-li Chen , Dan-qing Yu , Qi Wang
{"title":"Diastolic blood pressure as a predictor of short-term mortality in infective endocarditis","authors":"Su-ling Du ,&nbsp;Jing-wen Li ,&nbsp;Ying Chen ,&nbsp;Xue-biao Wei ,&nbsp;Yan-li Chen ,&nbsp;Dan-qing Yu ,&nbsp;Qi Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is an established risk factor for mortality in several cardiovascular diseases. However, its prognostic value in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled 1705 patients diagnosed with IE and categorized them into three groups based on admitted DBP tertiles: &lt;60 mmHg (n = 505), 60–72 mmHg (n = 629), and ≥72 mmHg (n = 571). Restricted cubic splines were used to assess nonlinear relationships. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for adverse outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with DBP &lt;60 mmHg had significantly higher rates of in-hospital mortality (10.7 % vs. 6.4 % vs. 4.4 %; <em>P &lt; 0.001</em>) and major adverse clinical events (25.5 % vs. 18.0 % vs. 14.0 %; <em>P &lt; 0.001</em>). An approximately inverse linear relationship was observed between DBP and in-hospital mortality. The optimal DBP cut-off value for predicting in-hospital death was 60 mmHg (AUC = 0.617; <em>P &lt; 0.001</em>). DBP &lt;60 mmHg was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 2.395; <em>P = 0.004</em>). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significantly higher 6-month mortality in patients with DBP &lt;60 mmHg compared to those with DBP ≥60 mmHg (log-rank test = 10.8; <em>P = 0.001</em>). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that DBP &lt;60 mmHg was independently associated with 6-month mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.457; <em>P = 0.032</em>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Lower DBP was significantly associated with an increased risk of short-term mortality in IE patients. The finding highlights low DBP as an important clinical marker of disease severity that should warrant enhanced monitoring and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 200522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487525001606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is an established risk factor for mortality in several cardiovascular diseases. However, its prognostic value in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) remains unclear.

Methods

We enrolled 1705 patients diagnosed with IE and categorized them into three groups based on admitted DBP tertiles: <60 mmHg (n = 505), 60–72 mmHg (n = 629), and ≥72 mmHg (n = 571). Restricted cubic splines were used to assess nonlinear relationships. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for adverse outcomes.

Results

Patients with DBP <60 mmHg had significantly higher rates of in-hospital mortality (10.7 % vs. 6.4 % vs. 4.4 %; P < 0.001) and major adverse clinical events (25.5 % vs. 18.0 % vs. 14.0 %; P < 0.001). An approximately inverse linear relationship was observed between DBP and in-hospital mortality. The optimal DBP cut-off value for predicting in-hospital death was 60 mmHg (AUC = 0.617; P < 0.001). DBP <60 mmHg was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 2.395; P = 0.004). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significantly higher 6-month mortality in patients with DBP <60 mmHg compared to those with DBP ≥60 mmHg (log-rank test = 10.8; P = 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that DBP <60 mmHg was independently associated with 6-month mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.457; P = 0.032).

Conclusions

Lower DBP was significantly associated with an increased risk of short-term mortality in IE patients. The finding highlights low DBP as an important clinical marker of disease severity that should warrant enhanced monitoring and management.
舒张压作为感染性心内膜炎短期死亡率的预测因子
背景:舒张压(DBP)是几种心血管疾病死亡的确定危险因素。然而,其在感染性心内膜炎(IE)患者中的预后价值尚不清楚。方法本研究纳入1705例确诊为IE的患者,并根据入院DBP值将其分为3组:60 mmHg (n = 505)、60 - 72 mmHg (n = 629)和≥72 mmHg (n = 571)。限制三次样条用于评估非线性关系。进行多变量分析以确定不良结果的独立危险因素。结果舒张压60 mmHg患者的住院死亡率(10.7% vs. 6.4% vs. 4.4%; P < 0.001)和主要临床不良事件发生率(25.5% vs. 18.0% vs. 14.0%; P < 0.001)显著高于舒张压60 mmHg患者。舒张压与住院死亡率呈近似反比线性关系。预测院内死亡的最佳DBP临界值为60 mmHg (AUC = 0.617; P < 0.001)。舒张压(DBP <60 mmHg)与住院死亡率独立相关(校正优势比= 2.395;P = 0.004)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,与DBP≥60 mmHg的患者相比,DBP≤60 mmHg的患者6个月死亡率显著高于DBP≥60 mmHg的患者(log-rank检验= 10.8;P = 0.001)。多因素Cox分析证实,舒张压(DBP <60 mmHg)与6个月死亡率独立相关(校正风险比= 1.457;P = 0.032)。结论舒张压减慢与IE患者短期死亡风险增加显著相关。该发现强调低舒张压是疾病严重程度的重要临床标志,应加强监测和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信