The shifting role of nature and the landscape in psychiatric Institutions: A case study from Germany in a historical perspective

IF 2.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hannah-Lea Schmid , Timothy McCall , Michel Rinderhagen , Claudia Hornberg , Klaus-Thomas Kronmüller , Christine Norra , Stefan Zerbe
{"title":"The shifting role of nature and the landscape in psychiatric Institutions: A case study from Germany in a historical perspective","authors":"Hannah-Lea Schmid ,&nbsp;Timothy McCall ,&nbsp;Michel Rinderhagen ,&nbsp;Claudia Hornberg ,&nbsp;Klaus-Thomas Kronmüller ,&nbsp;Christine Norra ,&nbsp;Stefan Zerbe","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature has been pivotal in psychiatric care since the establishment of asylums, but its role within psychiatric institutions over time, including landscape design, utilisation, and therapeutic impact, has received limited attention. This study addresses this gap through a case study of a psychiatric clinic in Gütersloh, Germany. Drawing on scientific literature, historical analyses, and archival material, we trace the transformation of the clinic's landscape from its planning in 1904 to the present day. We examine its relationship with treatment paradigms, socio-political influences, and evolving theories of environmental mental health.</div><div>The analysis identifies five overlapping phases in the development: (1) <em>Nature as Therapy</em>, when rural locations and gardens were viewed as inherently therapeutic; (2) <em>Work in Nature</em>, a shift to agricultural work therapy which, under National Socialism, became distorted into forced labour; (3) <em>Therapy Indoors</em>, a post-war transition toward occupational and group therapies; (4) <em>Therapy in the Individual Body</em>, reflecting the rise of pharmacology and psychotherapy that shifted the locus of therapy and control to the patient's body; and (5) <em>Therapy in the Community</em>, outpatient care expanded in the decades following the “Psychiatry Enquête”.</div><div>Despite these shifts, research on current patient feedback highlights the continued value of greenspaces, aligning with the growing evidence of health-promoting effects of nature. By synthesising historical insights with current evidence, this research contributes to interdisciplinary understanding and provides insights for nature's integration into future psychiatric care. Participatory approaches and multifunctionality are essential to address the varied needs of psychiatric patients and maximise nature's therapeutic potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525001222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature has been pivotal in psychiatric care since the establishment of asylums, but its role within psychiatric institutions over time, including landscape design, utilisation, and therapeutic impact, has received limited attention. This study addresses this gap through a case study of a psychiatric clinic in Gütersloh, Germany. Drawing on scientific literature, historical analyses, and archival material, we trace the transformation of the clinic's landscape from its planning in 1904 to the present day. We examine its relationship with treatment paradigms, socio-political influences, and evolving theories of environmental mental health.
The analysis identifies five overlapping phases in the development: (1) Nature as Therapy, when rural locations and gardens were viewed as inherently therapeutic; (2) Work in Nature, a shift to agricultural work therapy which, under National Socialism, became distorted into forced labour; (3) Therapy Indoors, a post-war transition toward occupational and group therapies; (4) Therapy in the Individual Body, reflecting the rise of pharmacology and psychotherapy that shifted the locus of therapy and control to the patient's body; and (5) Therapy in the Community, outpatient care expanded in the decades following the “Psychiatry Enquête”.
Despite these shifts, research on current patient feedback highlights the continued value of greenspaces, aligning with the growing evidence of health-promoting effects of nature. By synthesising historical insights with current evidence, this research contributes to interdisciplinary understanding and provides insights for nature's integration into future psychiatric care. Participatory approaches and multifunctionality are essential to address the varied needs of psychiatric patients and maximise nature's therapeutic potential.
自然和景观在精神病院的转变作用:从历史角度对德国的案例研究
自精神病院建立以来,自然一直是精神病院护理的关键,但随着时间的推移,它在精神病院中的作用,包括景观设计、利用和治疗影响,受到的关注有限。本研究通过对德国g特斯洛一家精神病诊所的案例研究来解决这一差距。利用科学文献、历史分析和档案材料,我们追溯了从1904年规划到现在诊所景观的转变。我们研究其与治疗范例,社会政治影响和不断发展的环境心理健康理论的关系。分析确定了发展的五个重叠阶段:(1)自然作为治疗,当农村地区和花园被视为天生的治疗;(2)自然工作,转向农业工作治疗,在国家社会主义制度下,被扭曲为强迫劳动;(3)室内治疗,战后向职业治疗和团体治疗的过渡;(4)个体体内治疗,反映了药理学和心理治疗的兴起,将治疗和控制的场所转移到患者的身体;(5)社区治疗,门诊治疗在“精神病学Enquête”之后的几十年里得到了扩展。尽管发生了这些变化,但对当前患者反馈的研究强调了绿色空间的持续价值,这与越来越多的证据表明自然对健康有促进作用相一致。通过将历史见解与当前证据相结合,本研究有助于跨学科的理解,并为将自然整合到未来的精神病学护理中提供见解。参与性方法和多功能性对于解决精神病患者的各种需求和最大限度地发挥自然治疗潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信