Investigating the effect of flexural stiffness, strain levels, and temperature on the fatigue failure of asphalt mixtures containing geocomposites in various layers

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Mohsen Piralaiy , Morteza Modarresi , Hossein Aalinejadian , Hamid Shirmohammadi
{"title":"Investigating the effect of flexural stiffness, strain levels, and temperature on the fatigue failure of asphalt mixtures containing geocomposites in various layers","authors":"Mohsen Piralaiy ,&nbsp;Morteza Modarresi ,&nbsp;Hossein Aalinejadian ,&nbsp;Hamid Shirmohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Asphalt pavements frequently experience structural deficiency in the form of cracking, leading to expensive repair and decreased service life. Although traditional overlays are routinely employed to retard pavement degradation, the reflection of existing cracks in new overlays is a major concern. Considering this gap, the study investigates the placement of geocomposites at strategic points in asphalt slabs to assess their effectiveness in enhancing fatigue resistance, decreasing damage growth, and improving structural performance under various levels of strain and temperature. The main goal is to determine the capabilities of geocomposites in increasing pavement life through experimental fatigue testing and theoretical damage mechanics modeling, providing sustainable solutions for road repair and maintenance. The research approach entails experimental testing using the four-point bending beam apparatus in strain-controlled mode under 250, 400, 650, and 1000 microstrain strain levels. Geocomposites are placed in either the middle third or the ends of asphalt slabs, and their performance is compared with that of unreinforced specimens at ambient and sub-zero temperatures (22 and −25°C). Regression analysis is also used to establish predictive relationships between strain levels, material characteristics, and rates of deterioration. The findings indicate that geocomposite-reinforced specimens have significantly better fatigue life than unreinforced specimens, with improvements of up to 71 % for higher strain levels. The specimens reinforced at the ends perform better under higher loading, while specimens reinforced in the middle third provide better performance under lower strain levels. Reinforcement also lowers the rate of damage growth by 50 %, increasing the period between repairs of pavements. Notably, geocomposites display higher effectiveness in colder climates, where reinforced samples have over two times the fatigue life of unreinforced equivalents at a temperature of −25°C. By combining empirical findings with theoretical concepts, this research provides practical guidelines for enhancing pavement reinforcement practice, thus promoting economical and sustainable infrastructure development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"496 ","pages":"Article 143785"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825039364","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asphalt pavements frequently experience structural deficiency in the form of cracking, leading to expensive repair and decreased service life. Although traditional overlays are routinely employed to retard pavement degradation, the reflection of existing cracks in new overlays is a major concern. Considering this gap, the study investigates the placement of geocomposites at strategic points in asphalt slabs to assess their effectiveness in enhancing fatigue resistance, decreasing damage growth, and improving structural performance under various levels of strain and temperature. The main goal is to determine the capabilities of geocomposites in increasing pavement life through experimental fatigue testing and theoretical damage mechanics modeling, providing sustainable solutions for road repair and maintenance. The research approach entails experimental testing using the four-point bending beam apparatus in strain-controlled mode under 250, 400, 650, and 1000 microstrain strain levels. Geocomposites are placed in either the middle third or the ends of asphalt slabs, and their performance is compared with that of unreinforced specimens at ambient and sub-zero temperatures (22 and −25°C). Regression analysis is also used to establish predictive relationships between strain levels, material characteristics, and rates of deterioration. The findings indicate that geocomposite-reinforced specimens have significantly better fatigue life than unreinforced specimens, with improvements of up to 71 % for higher strain levels. The specimens reinforced at the ends perform better under higher loading, while specimens reinforced in the middle third provide better performance under lower strain levels. Reinforcement also lowers the rate of damage growth by 50 %, increasing the period between repairs of pavements. Notably, geocomposites display higher effectiveness in colder climates, where reinforced samples have over two times the fatigue life of unreinforced equivalents at a temperature of −25°C. By combining empirical findings with theoretical concepts, this research provides practical guidelines for enhancing pavement reinforcement practice, thus promoting economical and sustainable infrastructure development.
研究了抗弯刚度、应变水平和温度对不同层数含土工复合材料沥青混合料疲劳破坏的影响
沥青路面经常出现裂缝形式的结构缺陷,导致维修费用昂贵,使用寿命缩短。虽然传统的覆盖层通常用于延缓路面退化,但新覆盖层中现有裂缝的反映是一个主要问题。考虑到这一差距,该研究调查了土工复合材料在沥青板的战略点上的放置,以评估其在不同应变和温度水平下增强抗疲劳性,减少损伤增长和改善结构性能的有效性。主要目标是通过试验疲劳测试和理论损伤力学建模来确定土工复合材料提高路面寿命的能力,为道路维修和维护提供可持续的解决方案。研究方法是在应变控制模式下使用四点弯曲梁装置在250、400、650和1000微应变应变水平下进行实验测试。土工复合材料被放置在沥青石板的中间三分之一或末端,并在环境和零下温度(22和- 25°C)下与未加筋试件的性能进行比较。回归分析也用于建立应变水平、材料特性和劣化率之间的预测关系。研究结果表明,土工复合材料增强试件的疲劳寿命明显优于未增强试件,在较高应变水平下可提高71% %。端部加筋的试件在高荷载下表现较好,而中间加筋的试件在较低应变水平下表现较好。加固也降低了50% %的伤害增长速度,增加了道路维修之间的时间间隔。值得注意的是,土工复合材料在较冷的气候条件下表现出更高的有效性,在- 25°C的温度下,增强样品的疲劳寿命是未增强样品的两倍以上。本研究将实证结果与理论概念相结合,为加强路面加固实践提供实践指导,从而促进基础设施的经济可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信