{"title":"Nonlinear tension stiffening and cracking behaviour of concrete reinforced with EN 1.4301 and EN 1.4482 stainless steel rebars","authors":"H. Moodley , S. Afshan , P. Desnerck , J. Melo","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents an experimental investigation into the tension stiffening behaviour and crack formation of concrete elements reinforced with stainless steel rebars. Specimens reinforced with 12 mm diameter cold-rolled austenitic EN 1.4301 and 16 mm diameter hot-rolled lean-duplex EN 1.4482 stainless steel rebars were tested under uniaxial tension, with strain and crack development monitored using a Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique. The study compares the tension stiffening stress–strain responses and cracking behaviour of stainless steel and conventional B500C carbon steel rebars, showing broadly similar behaviour up to first cracking, but with differences emerging due to the nonlinear stress-strain response of stainless steel. In particular, stainless steel rebars exhibited a less pronounced tension stiffening effect in 12 mm bars, comparable behaviour in 16 mm bars and a continuation of tension stiffening beyond the 0.2 % proof stress that gradually decayed towards the bare rebar response. The applicability of codified models from <em>Eurocode 2</em>, <em>Model Code 1990</em> and <em>Model Code 2010</em>, including those for tension stiffening, crack spacing and crack width prediction, is assessed for stainless steel rebars. Finally, an improved tension stiffening model for stainless steel rebars is presented, based on <em>Model Code 1990</em>, <em>Model Code 2010</em> and <em>Eurocode</em> formulations and incorporating the Ramberg-Osgood stress-strain relationship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 121458"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625018498","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental investigation into the tension stiffening behaviour and crack formation of concrete elements reinforced with stainless steel rebars. Specimens reinforced with 12 mm diameter cold-rolled austenitic EN 1.4301 and 16 mm diameter hot-rolled lean-duplex EN 1.4482 stainless steel rebars were tested under uniaxial tension, with strain and crack development monitored using a Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique. The study compares the tension stiffening stress–strain responses and cracking behaviour of stainless steel and conventional B500C carbon steel rebars, showing broadly similar behaviour up to first cracking, but with differences emerging due to the nonlinear stress-strain response of stainless steel. In particular, stainless steel rebars exhibited a less pronounced tension stiffening effect in 12 mm bars, comparable behaviour in 16 mm bars and a continuation of tension stiffening beyond the 0.2 % proof stress that gradually decayed towards the bare rebar response. The applicability of codified models from Eurocode 2, Model Code 1990 and Model Code 2010, including those for tension stiffening, crack spacing and crack width prediction, is assessed for stainless steel rebars. Finally, an improved tension stiffening model for stainless steel rebars is presented, based on Model Code 1990, Model Code 2010 and Eurocode formulations and incorporating the Ramberg-Osgood stress-strain relationship.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.