Synergistic utilization of white mud and coal gasification slag in low-carbon cement

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Qing Wang , Zhihang Hu , Yong Chen , Xiaowei Gu , Banhan Yang , Zhijun Li
{"title":"Synergistic utilization of white mud and coal gasification slag in low-carbon cement","authors":"Qing Wang ,&nbsp;Zhihang Hu ,&nbsp;Yong Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Gu ,&nbsp;Banhan Yang ,&nbsp;Zhijun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the synergistic use of two typical industrial solid wastes, coal gasification slag (CGS) and white mud (WM), common to coal chemical companies, as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) at high substitution levels. Studies demonstrate that CGS and WM (alkali/carbonate-rich) enhance cement hydration by consuming calcium hydroxide and promoting carboaluminate phases like hemicarboaluminate (Hc) and monocarboaluminate (Mc). In contrast to cement systems containing only CGS, the introduction of WM enhances early strength development and stabilises calcite, preventing its conversion to monosulphide-type sulphoaluminate (Ms) in the later stages of hydration. However, over-addition (&gt;5 %) can lead to excessive alkalinity in the system, which inhibits the stable existence of the Hc/Mc phase and is detrimental to the development of long-term compressive strength. The optimum replacement level of CGS and WM was determined to be 35 % CGS and 5 % WM with a 28 days compressive strength of 36.5 MPa. The incorporation of WM optimised the pore structure and improved the densification of the microstructure. These findings underscore the potential of coal-derived wastes as sustainable SCMs, particularly for eco-friendly construction. Additionally, the CGS-WM system demonstrates heavy metal immobilization capacity, further amplifying its environmental advantages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"496 ","pages":"Article 143823"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825039741","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the synergistic use of two typical industrial solid wastes, coal gasification slag (CGS) and white mud (WM), common to coal chemical companies, as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) at high substitution levels. Studies demonstrate that CGS and WM (alkali/carbonate-rich) enhance cement hydration by consuming calcium hydroxide and promoting carboaluminate phases like hemicarboaluminate (Hc) and monocarboaluminate (Mc). In contrast to cement systems containing only CGS, the introduction of WM enhances early strength development and stabilises calcite, preventing its conversion to monosulphide-type sulphoaluminate (Ms) in the later stages of hydration. However, over-addition (>5 %) can lead to excessive alkalinity in the system, which inhibits the stable existence of the Hc/Mc phase and is detrimental to the development of long-term compressive strength. The optimum replacement level of CGS and WM was determined to be 35 % CGS and 5 % WM with a 28 days compressive strength of 36.5 MPa. The incorporation of WM optimised the pore structure and improved the densification of the microstructure. These findings underscore the potential of coal-derived wastes as sustainable SCMs, particularly for eco-friendly construction. Additionally, the CGS-WM system demonstrates heavy metal immobilization capacity, further amplifying its environmental advantages.
白泥与煤气化渣在低碳水泥中的协同利用
本研究探讨了两种典型的工业固体废物,煤化工公司常见的煤气化渣(CGS)和白泥(WM)作为高替代水平的补充胶凝材料(SCMs)的协同利用。研究表明,CGS和WM(富碱/富碳酸盐)通过消耗氢氧化钙和促进半碳铝酸盐(Hc)和单碳铝酸盐(Mc)等碳铝酸盐相来增强水泥水化。与仅含CGS的水泥体系相比,WM的引入提高了方解石的早期强度发展,并稳定了方解石,防止其在水化后期转化为单硫化物型硫铝酸盐(Ms)。但过量添加(>5 %)会导致体系碱度过高,抑制Hc/Mc相的稳定存在,不利于长期抗压强度的发展。确定了CGS和WM的最佳替代水平为35 % CGS和5 % WM, 28 d抗压强度为36.5 MPa。WM的加入优化了孔隙结构,提高了微观结构的致密性。这些发现强调了煤炭衍生废物作为可持续可持续的scm的潜力,特别是对于生态友好型建筑。此外,CGS-WM系统显示出重金属固定能力,进一步扩大了其环境优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信