{"title":"Experimental study on seismic performance of infilled frames with improved flexible connection","authors":"Lihong Xiong , Zhuoxin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the seismic performance of infilled frames with improved flexible connections (IFC), addressing limitations of conventional flexible connections (FC) recommended by Chinese seismic design codes. In-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) quasi-static tests were conducted on both IFC and FC infilled frames to evaluate and compare their bi-directional seismic behavior. Additional OOP tests on IFC infills were performed to establish performance levels. Finite element simulations were developed to reproduce the IP and OOP responses, and were validated against experimental hysteresis behaviors and damage patterns to explore underlying damage mechanisms further. Results demonstrate that IFC infills utilizing basalt fiber grid (BFG) tie-belts provide superior in-plane decoupling and out-of-plane stability compared to FC infills, especially for autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry. Under bi-directional loading, FC infills exhibited reduced OOP capacity due to prior in-plane damage, revealing potential vulnerabilities of conventional steel reinforcement connections. The proposed IFC system effectively mitigates these vulnerabilities and achieves enhanced IP capacity objectives and OOP performance, offering a robust solution for improving the seismic resilience of infilled frame structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 121467"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625018589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the seismic performance of infilled frames with improved flexible connections (IFC), addressing limitations of conventional flexible connections (FC) recommended by Chinese seismic design codes. In-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) quasi-static tests were conducted on both IFC and FC infilled frames to evaluate and compare their bi-directional seismic behavior. Additional OOP tests on IFC infills were performed to establish performance levels. Finite element simulations were developed to reproduce the IP and OOP responses, and were validated against experimental hysteresis behaviors and damage patterns to explore underlying damage mechanisms further. Results demonstrate that IFC infills utilizing basalt fiber grid (BFG) tie-belts provide superior in-plane decoupling and out-of-plane stability compared to FC infills, especially for autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry. Under bi-directional loading, FC infills exhibited reduced OOP capacity due to prior in-plane damage, revealing potential vulnerabilities of conventional steel reinforcement connections. The proposed IFC system effectively mitigates these vulnerabilities and achieves enhanced IP capacity objectives and OOP performance, offering a robust solution for improving the seismic resilience of infilled frame structures.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.