{"title":"Blast performance and damage assessment of square reinforced concrete (RC) panels with openings","authors":"Chaofeng Hua , Hong Hao , Yifei Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reinforced concrete (RC) panels are frequently designed with door and window openings to fulfill functionality requirements such as lighting, ventilation, and access. Understanding the blast resistance of these panels with openings is critical for ensuring structural safety under blast loading conditions. This study delves into the blast response of three RC panels (2.2 m × 2.2 m ×0.13 m) through field tests using 9 kg of TNT at a scaled distance of 0.61 m/kg<sup>1/3</sup>. The tested panels include one with a window opening, one with a door opening, and one solid panel as a reference. The experimental results noted that while all panels exhibited flexural damage, the panels with openings demonstrated a better blast resistance, owing to the opening that effectively reduced blast loads acting on the panel. At the same measurement location, the door-opening panel exhibited a 19.5 % reduction in maximum displacement and a 69.6 % reduction in residual displacement compared to the solid panel. Subsequently, finite element models were developed using LS-DYNA and verified against the experimental results. The numerical analysis highlighted that the openings altered the distributions of internal forces. A series of numerical simulations were performed to develop pressure-impulse (P-I) diagrams for panels with and without openings, basing on the UFC damage criteria. The results indicated that panels with openings exhibited less damage than solid panels. Analytical formula with best fitted parameters for constructing the P-I diagrams of the studied panels was developed for quick assessment of the panel performance under blast loadings for practical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 121476"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962501867X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reinforced concrete (RC) panels are frequently designed with door and window openings to fulfill functionality requirements such as lighting, ventilation, and access. Understanding the blast resistance of these panels with openings is critical for ensuring structural safety under blast loading conditions. This study delves into the blast response of three RC panels (2.2 m × 2.2 m ×0.13 m) through field tests using 9 kg of TNT at a scaled distance of 0.61 m/kg1/3. The tested panels include one with a window opening, one with a door opening, and one solid panel as a reference. The experimental results noted that while all panels exhibited flexural damage, the panels with openings demonstrated a better blast resistance, owing to the opening that effectively reduced blast loads acting on the panel. At the same measurement location, the door-opening panel exhibited a 19.5 % reduction in maximum displacement and a 69.6 % reduction in residual displacement compared to the solid panel. Subsequently, finite element models were developed using LS-DYNA and verified against the experimental results. The numerical analysis highlighted that the openings altered the distributions of internal forces. A series of numerical simulations were performed to develop pressure-impulse (P-I) diagrams for panels with and without openings, basing on the UFC damage criteria. The results indicated that panels with openings exhibited less damage than solid panels. Analytical formula with best fitted parameters for constructing the P-I diagrams of the studied panels was developed for quick assessment of the panel performance under blast loadings for practical applications.
钢筋混凝土(RC)面板经常设计有门窗开口,以满足照明、通风和通道等功能要求。了解这些开口板的抗爆炸能力对于确保爆炸荷载条件下的结构安全至关重要。本研究通过使用9 kg TNT在0.61 m/kg1/3的比例尺距离上的现场试验,深入研究了三个RC板(2.2 m × 2.2 m ×0.13 m)的爆炸响应。测试的面板包括一个有窗户开口的面板,一个有门开口的面板和一个作为参考的实心面板。实验结果表明,虽然所有面板都出现了弯曲损伤,但有开口的面板表现出更好的抗爆炸性能,因为开口有效地减少了作用在面板上的爆炸载荷。在相同的测量位置,与固体面板相比,开门面板的最大位移减少了19.5% %,剩余位移减少了69.6 %。随后,利用LS-DYNA建立了有限元模型,并与实验结果进行了对比验证。数值分析表明,开口改变了内力的分布。在UFC损伤标准的基础上,进行了一系列数值模拟,以建立有开口和没有开口的面板的压力-脉冲(P-I)图。结果表明,开孔板比实心板损伤更小。为了快速评估实际应用中爆炸荷载作用下的面板性能,建立了具有最佳拟合参数的分析公式,用于构建所研究面板的P-I图。
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.