Rubia Tatiana Secco , Luana Meister , Elivane Salete Capellesso , Raissa Iana Leite Jardim , Elielson Lucas Ferreira , José Carlos Ricardo Molina , Darcy Maria da Conceição Laura dos Santos , Alessandra da Cunha Pessoa , Camila Naomi Lermen , Josué Barbi Araldi , Julia Caroline Prade de Souza Cabral , Alessandro Camargo Angelo , Márcia C.M. Marques
{"title":"Exploring multiple restoration strategies to recover the Atlantic Forest landscape","authors":"Rubia Tatiana Secco , Luana Meister , Elivane Salete Capellesso , Raissa Iana Leite Jardim , Elielson Lucas Ferreira , José Carlos Ricardo Molina , Darcy Maria da Conceição Laura dos Santos , Alessandra da Cunha Pessoa , Camila Naomi Lermen , Josué Barbi Araldi , Julia Caroline Prade de Souza Cabral , Alessandro Camargo Angelo , Márcia C.M. Marques","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological restoration is a promising activity that restores degraded ecosystems and conserves the biodiversity of tropical landscapes. Hoping to achieve better results on a large scale, various strategies and techniques have been used, including passive and active restoration that can impact community structure and landscape characteristics differently. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of passive and active restoration in recovering native tree regenerating communities in a degraded area of the Atlantic Forest in southern Brazil. We evaluated the species composition and community structure between passive (natural regeneration) and active (mixed and pure plantations techniques) restoration strategies in young (∼20 years) restoration areas in comparison to the reference ecosystem (old-growth forest). We found similarities between restoration treatments and the reference area, despite the latter being composed of a more diverse community and shade-tolerant species. The three restoration strategies (mixed plantation, <em>Inga edulis</em> plantation, and natural regeneration) converged in terms of the abundance of individuals and tree species composition. Still, they diverged in terms of species richness and diversity, as the areas of natural regeneration were, in general, less species-rich and diverse than the others. Our results show that active restoration of <em>Inga edulis</em>, was more effective in restoring mainly humid soils. These results indicate that diversification of restoration strategies can yield positive outcomes at the landscape scale, and combining multiple forms of restoration is a less costly and more efficient restoration in the context of tropical forest landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"598 ","pages":"Article 123207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725007157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ecological restoration is a promising activity that restores degraded ecosystems and conserves the biodiversity of tropical landscapes. Hoping to achieve better results on a large scale, various strategies and techniques have been used, including passive and active restoration that can impact community structure and landscape characteristics differently. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of passive and active restoration in recovering native tree regenerating communities in a degraded area of the Atlantic Forest in southern Brazil. We evaluated the species composition and community structure between passive (natural regeneration) and active (mixed and pure plantations techniques) restoration strategies in young (∼20 years) restoration areas in comparison to the reference ecosystem (old-growth forest). We found similarities between restoration treatments and the reference area, despite the latter being composed of a more diverse community and shade-tolerant species. The three restoration strategies (mixed plantation, Inga edulis plantation, and natural regeneration) converged in terms of the abundance of individuals and tree species composition. Still, they diverged in terms of species richness and diversity, as the areas of natural regeneration were, in general, less species-rich and diverse than the others. Our results show that active restoration of Inga edulis, was more effective in restoring mainly humid soils. These results indicate that diversification of restoration strategies can yield positive outcomes at the landscape scale, and combining multiple forms of restoration is a less costly and more efficient restoration in the context of tropical forest landscapes.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.