Comparative analysis of nutritional, rheological, and sensory attributes of biscuits enriched with white and black chia seed powders: Evaluation under Egyptian cultivation conditions

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Clara R. Azzam , Sayed M. Mostafa , Mokhtar S. Rizk , Ramadan A. Arafa , Emad A. Salem , Ahmed M.S. Hussein
{"title":"Comparative analysis of nutritional, rheological, and sensory attributes of biscuits enriched with white and black chia seed powders: Evaluation under Egyptian cultivation conditions","authors":"Clara R. Azzam ,&nbsp;Sayed M. Mostafa ,&nbsp;Mokhtar S. Rizk ,&nbsp;Ramadan A. Arafa ,&nbsp;Emad A. Salem ,&nbsp;Ahmed M.S. Hussein","doi":"10.1016/j.ifset.2025.104252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the impact of fortifying wheat flour biscuits with white (CACH-W) and black (CACH-B) chia seed powders at substitution levels of 0 % (control), 5 %, 10 %, and 15 % to develop functional biscuits with improved nutritional and sensory qualities. At all substitution levels, the chemical composition, rheological behavior, and sensory properties of the biscuits were evaluated. Black chia seed powder (CACH-B) contained higher levels of protein, fiber, minerals, phenolics, and antioxidants compared with white chia (CACH-W) and wheat flour. Both chia types exhibited favorable fatty acid profiles, with ω6/ω3 ratios close to 1:2. Chia incorporation enhanced the protein, fiber, and mineral contents of the biscuits, with CACH-B formulations providing greater nutritional improvement but showing slight sensory decline at higher substitution levels. Physical properties such as weight and volume decreased with chia addition, while pasting behavior showed increased viscosity due to chia mucilage. Incorporation of up to 15 % chia powder maintained acceptable product quality, highlighting its potential for health-oriented bakery applications. Overall, fortification with chia seed powder substantially improves the nutritional profile of biscuits, with minimal compromise on sensory acceptability, suggesting that moderate substitution (5–10 %) offers an optimal balance. This research contributes to the development of sustainable, functional bakery products that align with current trends in food innovation and consumer health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":329,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 104252"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856425003364","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of fortifying wheat flour biscuits with white (CACH-W) and black (CACH-B) chia seed powders at substitution levels of 0 % (control), 5 %, 10 %, and 15 % to develop functional biscuits with improved nutritional and sensory qualities. At all substitution levels, the chemical composition, rheological behavior, and sensory properties of the biscuits were evaluated. Black chia seed powder (CACH-B) contained higher levels of protein, fiber, minerals, phenolics, and antioxidants compared with white chia (CACH-W) and wheat flour. Both chia types exhibited favorable fatty acid profiles, with ω6/ω3 ratios close to 1:2. Chia incorporation enhanced the protein, fiber, and mineral contents of the biscuits, with CACH-B formulations providing greater nutritional improvement but showing slight sensory decline at higher substitution levels. Physical properties such as weight and volume decreased with chia addition, while pasting behavior showed increased viscosity due to chia mucilage. Incorporation of up to 15 % chia powder maintained acceptable product quality, highlighting its potential for health-oriented bakery applications. Overall, fortification with chia seed powder substantially improves the nutritional profile of biscuits, with minimal compromise on sensory acceptability, suggesting that moderate substitution (5–10 %) offers an optimal balance. This research contributes to the development of sustainable, functional bakery products that align with current trends in food innovation and consumer health.
添加了白色和黑色奇亚籽粉的饼干的营养、流变学和感官特性的比较分析:在埃及栽培条件下的评价
本研究考察了在小麦粉饼干中添加0 %(对照)、5 %、10 %和15 %替代水平的白色(cache - w)和黑色(cache - b)奇亚籽粉对改善营养和感官品质的功能性饼干的影响。在所有替代水平上,对饼干的化学成分、流变行为和感官特性进行了评估。黑奇亚籽粉(cache - b)比白奇亚籽粉(cache - w)和小麦粉含有更高水平的蛋白质、纤维、矿物质、酚类物质和抗氧化剂。两种奇亚类型均表现出良好的脂肪酸谱,ω6/ω3比值接近1:2。添加奇亚酸提高了饼干的蛋白质、纤维和矿物质含量,添加cacha - b后,饼干的营养成分得到了更大的改善,但在替代水平较高时,饼干的感官功能略有下降。添加奇亚籽后,其重量和体积等物理性能下降,而糊化行为则由于奇亚籽的黏性而增加。加入高达15%的奇亚粉保持了可接受的产品质量,突出了其在面向健康的烘焙应用中的潜力。总的来说,用奇亚籽粉强化大大改善了饼干的营养状况,对感官可接受性的影响最小,这表明适度替代(5 - 10%)提供了最佳的平衡。这项研究有助于开发可持续的、功能性的烘焙产品,与当前食品创新和消费者健康的趋势保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
259
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies (IFSET) aims to provide the highest quality original contributions and few, mainly upon invitation, reviews on and highly innovative developments in food science and emerging food process technologies. The significance of the results either for the science community or for industrial R&D groups must be specified. Papers submitted must be of highest scientific quality and only those advancing current scientific knowledge and understanding or with technical relevance will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信