On the suitability of non-dormant alfalfa to tolerate off-season groundwater recharge during winter and spring periods

IF 6.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Helen E. Dahlke , Yonatan Ganot , Nicholas Clark , Khaled Bali , Daniel H. Putnam
{"title":"On the suitability of non-dormant alfalfa to tolerate off-season groundwater recharge during winter and spring periods","authors":"Helen E. Dahlke ,&nbsp;Yonatan Ganot ,&nbsp;Nicholas Clark ,&nbsp;Khaled Bali ,&nbsp;Daniel H. Putnam","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Winter groundwater recharge, which involves flooding farmland with excess surface water during the dormant season to replenish underlying aquifers, is a promising water conservation strategy, and alfalfa represents a particularly promising crop for this practice. In this study, we investigated yield and forage quality effects of intentional winter or spring flooding of non-dormant alfalfa (<em>Medicago sativa L.</em>) for groundwater recharge. A replicated randomized complete block design study was implemented at the University of California Kearney Research and Extension Center (KARE) in Parlier, CA testing three treatments (3 days of flooding followed by 4 days without flooding, 4 days of flooding followed by 10 days without flooding, and control) for a duration of 6 weeks in winter 2019 and spring 2020. A total of 1.6 and 3.6 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−2</sup> (2019) and 1.3 and 2.2 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−2</sup> (2020) were recharged in the 4 on 10 off and 3 on 4 off flood treatments at a recharge efficiency of &gt; 88 % (81 % – 217 % of annual irrigation demand), respectively. The 2019 (Feb – Mar) experiment did not show significant differences in alfalfa yield in the first and second cutting after flooding but resulted in slight but non-significant decline in forage quality (e.g. crude protein; fair hay quality). The 2020 flooding experiment, conducted much later in the year (April – May), resulted in no significant differences in alfalfa yield but poor feed quality (utility grade), partly due to delays in harvesting. Together these results indicate that while caution is appropriate to prevent oxygen deprivation and impacts on alfalfa yield and quality, winter recharge in alfalfa fields in highly permeable soils appears to be a viable practice to conserve large quantities of surface water when available in excess.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 109859"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425005736","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Winter groundwater recharge, which involves flooding farmland with excess surface water during the dormant season to replenish underlying aquifers, is a promising water conservation strategy, and alfalfa represents a particularly promising crop for this practice. In this study, we investigated yield and forage quality effects of intentional winter or spring flooding of non-dormant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) for groundwater recharge. A replicated randomized complete block design study was implemented at the University of California Kearney Research and Extension Center (KARE) in Parlier, CA testing three treatments (3 days of flooding followed by 4 days without flooding, 4 days of flooding followed by 10 days without flooding, and control) for a duration of 6 weeks in winter 2019 and spring 2020. A total of 1.6 and 3.6 m3 m−2 (2019) and 1.3 and 2.2 m3 m−2 (2020) were recharged in the 4 on 10 off and 3 on 4 off flood treatments at a recharge efficiency of > 88 % (81 % – 217 % of annual irrigation demand), respectively. The 2019 (Feb – Mar) experiment did not show significant differences in alfalfa yield in the first and second cutting after flooding but resulted in slight but non-significant decline in forage quality (e.g. crude protein; fair hay quality). The 2020 flooding experiment, conducted much later in the year (April – May), resulted in no significant differences in alfalfa yield but poor feed quality (utility grade), partly due to delays in harvesting. Together these results indicate that while caution is appropriate to prevent oxygen deprivation and impacts on alfalfa yield and quality, winter recharge in alfalfa fields in highly permeable soils appears to be a viable practice to conserve large quantities of surface water when available in excess.
非休眠期紫花苜蓿对冬春两季地下水补给的适宜性
冬季地下水补给,包括在休眠季节用过量的地表水淹没农田以补充地下含水层,是一种很有前途的水资源保护策略,苜蓿代表了一种特别有前途的作物。本研究以非休眠紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)为研究对象,研究了冬季或春季为补给地下水而对其产量和饲料质量的影响。加州大学科尔尼研究与推广中心(KARE)在2019年冬季和2020年春季实施了一项重复的随机完整块设计研究,测试了三种处理方法(3天淹水后4天不淹水,4天淹水后10天不淹水,对照),持续6周。4开10关和3开4关处理分别补灌1.6和3.6 m3 m−2(2019)和1.3和2.2 m3 m−2(2020),补灌效率分别为>; 88 %(占年灌溉需求的81 % ~ 217 %)。2019年(2 - 3月)试验显示,淹水后第一次和第二次刈割的苜蓿产量差异不显著,但饲料质量(如粗蛋白质、干草质量)略有下降,但不显著。2020年的洪水试验是在今年晚些时候(4月至5月)进行的,结果表明苜蓿产量没有显著差异,但饲料质量(实用级)较差,部分原因是收获延迟。综上所述,这些结果表明,虽然需要谨慎防止缺氧和对苜蓿产量和质量的影响,但在高渗透性土壤中的苜蓿田冬季补给似乎是一种可行的做法,可以在可用的过量时保存大量的地表水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信