Disorderly transitions: How governance and fiscal asymmetries shape clean energy spillovers in Europe

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Vasilis Nikou
{"title":"Disorderly transitions: How governance and fiscal asymmetries shape clean energy spillovers in Europe","authors":"Vasilis Nikou","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study explores the institutional and fiscal determinants of clean energy (CLEAN) adoption across 14 European Union member states between 2010 and 2019, uncovering how governance quality, procurement practices, public investment, and banking sector fragility shape renewable energy shares both domestically and across borders. The findings reveal that non-competitive procurement, though occasionally used to expedite renewable projects under decarbonization deadlines, significantly undermines CLEAN outcomes when accounting for endogeneity and generates negative spillovers that erode investor trust in neighboring states. Similarly, banking distress, measured through non-performing loan ratios, stimulates domestic CLEAN investment via compensatory fiscal interventions, yet depresses cross-border capital flows vital to collective decarbonization goals. Public capital expenditure is shown to misalign with CLEAN objectives, often reinforcing fossil-dependent infrastructure, with statistically significant spillover effects that hinder regional progress. While environmental policy stringency is a strong driver of CLEAN in institutionally mature countries, its effects weaken where regulatory enforcement is uneven. The study underscores the critical role of contract monitoring and procurement transparency in shaping effective renewable strategies and highlights the need for coordinated policy frameworks that internalize externalities. These findings offer direct implications for EU cohesion policy, fiscal programming, and regulatory harmonization aimed at a just and efficient energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108945"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study explores the institutional and fiscal determinants of clean energy (CLEAN) adoption across 14 European Union member states between 2010 and 2019, uncovering how governance quality, procurement practices, public investment, and banking sector fragility shape renewable energy shares both domestically and across borders. The findings reveal that non-competitive procurement, though occasionally used to expedite renewable projects under decarbonization deadlines, significantly undermines CLEAN outcomes when accounting for endogeneity and generates negative spillovers that erode investor trust in neighboring states. Similarly, banking distress, measured through non-performing loan ratios, stimulates domestic CLEAN investment via compensatory fiscal interventions, yet depresses cross-border capital flows vital to collective decarbonization goals. Public capital expenditure is shown to misalign with CLEAN objectives, often reinforcing fossil-dependent infrastructure, with statistically significant spillover effects that hinder regional progress. While environmental policy stringency is a strong driver of CLEAN in institutionally mature countries, its effects weaken where regulatory enforcement is uneven. The study underscores the critical role of contract monitoring and procurement transparency in shaping effective renewable strategies and highlights the need for coordinated policy frameworks that internalize externalities. These findings offer direct implications for EU cohesion policy, fiscal programming, and regulatory harmonization aimed at a just and efficient energy transition.
无序转型:治理和财政不对称如何影响欧洲清洁能源溢出效应
该研究探讨了2010年至2019年期间14个欧盟成员国采用清洁能源(clean)的制度和财政决定因素,揭示了治理质量、采购实践、公共投资和银行业脆弱性如何影响国内和跨境可再生能源份额。研究结果表明,尽管非竞争性采购偶尔会在脱碳截止日期前用于加快可再生能源项目,但在考虑内生性时,它会显著破坏清洁成果,并产生负面溢出效应,侵蚀投资者对邻国的信任。同样,以不良贷款率衡量的银行业困境,通过补偿性财政干预刺激了国内的清洁投资,但抑制了对集体脱碳目标至关重要的跨境资本流动。公共资本支出与清洁目标不一致,往往加强了依赖化石的基础设施,具有统计学上显著的溢出效应,阻碍了区域进步。在制度成熟的国家,严格的环境政策是推动清洁能源的强大动力,但在监管执法不平衡的国家,其效果会减弱。该研究强调了合同监测和采购透明度在制定有效的可再生能源战略方面的关键作用,并强调需要协调一致的政策框架,将外部性内部化。这些发现对欧盟的凝聚力政策、财政规划和监管协调提供了直接的启示,旨在实现公正和高效的能源转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信