{"title":"Developmental changes in students’ mindset meaning systems: The role of perceived classroom goal structures","authors":"Junlin Yu , Tieme Janssen , Sibel Altikulaç , Smiddy Nieuwenhuis , Nienke van Atteveldt","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mindsets impact learning by shaping students’ beliefs about effort and achievement goals, creating two distinct meaning systems: a growth mindset-mastery goal system and a fixed mindset-performance goal system. Recent studies reveal that students often hold more complex combinations (profiles) of mindset-related beliefs and goals. Yet, little is known about how these profiles change over time and the contextual factors that contribute to these changes. This longitudinal study used a pattern-oriented approach to investigate (a) the naturally occurring profiles based on students’ mindset, effort beliefs, and goals; (b) the stability and change in these profiles over time; and (c) the influence of perceived classroom goal structures on profile changes. The study followed 430 students (210 girls, <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> at Time 1 = 12.86 years) over the first two years of secondary school. Four consistent profiles were identified in both years: <em>Growth Mindset-Low Performance Goals</em>, <em>Growth Mindset-Moderate Performance Goals</em>, <em>Mixed Mindset-High Performance Goals</em>, and <em>Fixed Mindset-Disengaged</em>. Although the <em>Growth Mindset-Low Performance Goals</em> profile was the largest in the first year (32 %), there was a noticeable shift toward less desirable profiles over time, with the <em>Fixed Mindset-Disengaged</em> profile becoming the most common by the second year (33 %). Students who initially perceived high mastery and low performance-avoidance goal structures were more likely to belong to and remain in growth mindset profiles. These findings deepen our understanding of the nature, stability, and contextual influences on students’ mindset meaning systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X25000827","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mindsets impact learning by shaping students’ beliefs about effort and achievement goals, creating two distinct meaning systems: a growth mindset-mastery goal system and a fixed mindset-performance goal system. Recent studies reveal that students often hold more complex combinations (profiles) of mindset-related beliefs and goals. Yet, little is known about how these profiles change over time and the contextual factors that contribute to these changes. This longitudinal study used a pattern-oriented approach to investigate (a) the naturally occurring profiles based on students’ mindset, effort beliefs, and goals; (b) the stability and change in these profiles over time; and (c) the influence of perceived classroom goal structures on profile changes. The study followed 430 students (210 girls, Mage at Time 1 = 12.86 years) over the first two years of secondary school. Four consistent profiles were identified in both years: Growth Mindset-Low Performance Goals, Growth Mindset-Moderate Performance Goals, Mixed Mindset-High Performance Goals, and Fixed Mindset-Disengaged. Although the Growth Mindset-Low Performance Goals profile was the largest in the first year (32 %), there was a noticeable shift toward less desirable profiles over time, with the Fixed Mindset-Disengaged profile becoming the most common by the second year (33 %). Students who initially perceived high mastery and low performance-avoidance goal structures were more likely to belong to and remain in growth mindset profiles. These findings deepen our understanding of the nature, stability, and contextual influences on students’ mindset meaning systems.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.