Visualizing odor: Cross-modal correspondence between the odor of botanical infusions and mosaic visualizations

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Fabio Tuccillo, Iida Blom, Annika Häme, Sanni Karjalainen, Thomas Lostedt, Jalmari Tuura, Mari Sandell
{"title":"Visualizing odor: Cross-modal correspondence between the odor of botanical infusions and mosaic visualizations","authors":"Fabio Tuccillo,&nbsp;Iida Blom,&nbsp;Annika Häme,&nbsp;Sanni Karjalainen,&nbsp;Thomas Lostedt,&nbsp;Jalmari Tuura,&nbsp;Mari Sandell","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cross-modal correspondences between olfaction and vision influence consumer perception and can be leveraged for sensory-informed product and packaging design. This study examined whether abstract visual representations, derived from odor profiles and odor-evoked color associations, can reflect actual odor perception. Six botanical infusions were first characterized through Check-All-That-Apply with naive participants (<em>n</em> = 95). Abstract mosaic visuals were generated using Voronoi tessellation based on either the frequency of odor descriptors (odor profile-based, OP) or the colors associated with the odors (color association-based, CA). A second group of consumers (<em>n</em> = 103) evaluated the perceived correspondence of these mosaics and their packaging mockups with the infusion odor. They also rated their liking of the odor and of the mosaics, and their willingness to buy (WTB) the infusion based on its odor and the packaging. OP mosaics were generally perceived as more representative of the infusion odor than CA mosaics, though both designs received similar correspondence scores for mint and rooibos. OP mosaics were also visually liked more than CA mosaics. Cluster analysis revealed two consumer segments with differing correspondence patterns, independent of demographic or consumption variables. Odor liking was the strongest predictor of WTB, though visual correspondence and mosaic features such as warmness and lightness also positively influenced responses. By integrating odor and odor-evoked color associations into abstract visual design, this study advances the understanding of cross-modal correspondence in product perception and highlights the potential of cross-modal design strategies for the botanical infusion market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 105720"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002952","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-modal correspondences between olfaction and vision influence consumer perception and can be leveraged for sensory-informed product and packaging design. This study examined whether abstract visual representations, derived from odor profiles and odor-evoked color associations, can reflect actual odor perception. Six botanical infusions were first characterized through Check-All-That-Apply with naive participants (n = 95). Abstract mosaic visuals were generated using Voronoi tessellation based on either the frequency of odor descriptors (odor profile-based, OP) or the colors associated with the odors (color association-based, CA). A second group of consumers (n = 103) evaluated the perceived correspondence of these mosaics and their packaging mockups with the infusion odor. They also rated their liking of the odor and of the mosaics, and their willingness to buy (WTB) the infusion based on its odor and the packaging. OP mosaics were generally perceived as more representative of the infusion odor than CA mosaics, though both designs received similar correspondence scores for mint and rooibos. OP mosaics were also visually liked more than CA mosaics. Cluster analysis revealed two consumer segments with differing correspondence patterns, independent of demographic or consumption variables. Odor liking was the strongest predictor of WTB, though visual correspondence and mosaic features such as warmness and lightness also positively influenced responses. By integrating odor and odor-evoked color associations into abstract visual design, this study advances the understanding of cross-modal correspondence in product perception and highlights the potential of cross-modal design strategies for the botanical infusion market.
可视化气味:植物注入的气味和马赛克可视化之间的交叉模态对应
嗅觉和视觉之间的跨模态对应关系影响消费者的感知,可以用于感官信息产品和包装设计。这项研究考察了从气味特征和气味引起的颜色关联中提取的抽象视觉表征是否能反映实际的气味感知。六种植物注射液首先通过检查所有的应用与幼稚的参与者(n = 95)进行表征。基于气味描述符的频率(基于气味特征,OP)或与气味相关的颜色(基于颜色关联,CA),使用Voronoi镶嵌生成抽象马赛克视觉效果。第二组消费者(n = 103)评估了这些马赛克及其包装模型与输液气味的感知对应关系。他们还根据气味和包装来评估自己对气味和马赛克的喜爱程度,以及购买的意愿(WTB)。OP马赛克通常被认为比CA马赛克更能代表输液气味,尽管两种设计在薄荷和路易波士茶中获得了相似的对应分数。OP马赛克在视觉上也比CA马赛克更受欢迎。聚类分析揭示了两个具有不同对应模式的消费者群体,独立于人口统计或消费变量。气味偏好是WTB的最强预测因子,尽管视觉对应和马赛克特征(如温暖和明亮)也对反应产生积极影响。通过将气味和气味引起的颜色关联整合到抽象的视觉设计中,本研究促进了对产品感知中的跨模态对应的理解,并强调了跨模态设计策略在植物输液市场的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信