Soil carbon accrual in ley rotations compared with cereal monoculture after four decades at four long-term experiments in Sweden

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Benjamin Bukombe , Martin A. Bolinder , Gunnar Börjesson , Lorenzo Menichetti , Rong Lang , Keith Paustian , Thomas Kätterer
{"title":"Soil carbon accrual in ley rotations compared with cereal monoculture after four decades at four long-term experiments in Sweden","authors":"Benjamin Bukombe ,&nbsp;Martin A. Bolinder ,&nbsp;Gunnar Börjesson ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Menichetti ,&nbsp;Rong Lang ,&nbsp;Keith Paustian ,&nbsp;Thomas Kätterer","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.110004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Long-term field experiments (LTEs) in which the effects of agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics have been quantified for the full soil profile are rare. We analysed 40–50-year data from four meta-replicated LTEs across Sweden comparing grass-clover ley-dominated rotations (LR) and cereal monocultures (CM; with or without crop residue retention) at four N fertilization rates, to quantify their effects on grain yield, C input and SOC dynamics in top- and subsoil. We found that grain yield was significantly higher in LR (3.5 ± 1.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than in the CM (2.7 ± 1.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>). Belowground C (BGC) inputs were identified as the major driver for SOC change. They were about three times higher in LR than in CM and explained 97 or 98 % of the variation in SOC change between rotations and N levels, respectively. Topsoil (0–20 cm) SOC content was consistently higher in LR than in CM and this difference increased over time. Topsoil SOC increased also with N application in CM, and 1 kg of N fertilizer was associated with approximately 1 kg of SOC increase. After 4–5 decades, we found significantly higher SOC stocks along the soil profiles in LR than in CM, 19.8 and 2.8 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> at 0–25 and 25–60 cm depth, respectively. The results also show that SOC stocks are driven by interactions between agricultural management practices and site-specific soil properties. This should be considered when designing management strategies for SOC sequestration in agricultural systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"396 ","pages":"Article 110004"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925005365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-term field experiments (LTEs) in which the effects of agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics have been quantified for the full soil profile are rare. We analysed 40–50-year data from four meta-replicated LTEs across Sweden comparing grass-clover ley-dominated rotations (LR) and cereal monocultures (CM; with or without crop residue retention) at four N fertilization rates, to quantify their effects on grain yield, C input and SOC dynamics in top- and subsoil. We found that grain yield was significantly higher in LR (3.5 ± 1.1 Mg ha−1) than in the CM (2.7 ± 1.1 Mg ha−1). Belowground C (BGC) inputs were identified as the major driver for SOC change. They were about three times higher in LR than in CM and explained 97 or 98 % of the variation in SOC change between rotations and N levels, respectively. Topsoil (0–20 cm) SOC content was consistently higher in LR than in CM and this difference increased over time. Topsoil SOC increased also with N application in CM, and 1 kg of N fertilizer was associated with approximately 1 kg of SOC increase. After 4–5 decades, we found significantly higher SOC stocks along the soil profiles in LR than in CM, 19.8 and 2.8 Mg C ha−1 at 0–25 and 25–60 cm depth, respectively. The results also show that SOC stocks are driven by interactions between agricultural management practices and site-specific soil properties. This should be considered when designing management strategies for SOC sequestration in agricultural systems.
在瑞典进行的四项长期试验中,麦田轮作与谷物单作40年后土壤碳积累的比较
在长期田间试验(LTEs)中,农业实践对土壤有机碳(SOC)动态的影响在全土壤剖面上是罕见的。我们分析了瑞典4个元重复LTEs的40 - 50年数据,比较了4种氮肥水平下草-三叶草以牧草为主的轮作(LR)和谷物单一栽培(CM;有或没有作物残留),以量化它们对籽粒产量、C输入和表层和底土有机碳动态的影响。结果表明,低密度处理的籽粒产量(3.5 ± 1.1 Mg ha - 1)显著高于高密度处理(2.7 ± 1.1 Mg ha - 1)。地下碳(BGC)输入被确定为SOC变化的主要驱动因素。土壤有机碳含量在轮作和氮素水平之间的差异分别为97%和98% %。耕层土壤(0 ~ 20 cm)有机碳含量一直高于耕层土壤,且随着时间的推移,这种差异逐渐增大。表层土壤有机碳随施氮量的增加而增加,施氮量为1 kg时,表层土壤有机碳增加约1 kg。经过4 ~ 5 a,我们发现在0 ~ 25和25 ~ 60 CM深度,低耕土壤土壤碳储量显著高于CM,分别为19.8和2.8 Mg C ha - 1。研究结果还表明,土壤有机碳储量是由农业管理措施和特定土壤性质之间的相互作用驱动的。在设计农业系统有机碳固存管理策略时应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信