Mohammad Ali Hilou, Seyed Abbas Hosseini , Ahmad Sharafati
{"title":"Assessing sediment connectivity with the InVEST model and a structural approach: a case study","authors":"Mohammad Ali Hilou, Seyed Abbas Hosseini , Ahmad Sharafati","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sediment connectivity is a fundamental concept for understanding sediment transport processes and managing watershed health. This study addresses the existing gap in comprehensive comparisons of sediment connectivity indices by evaluating two widely used methods: the structural-based Borselli index (IC_B) and the process-based InVEST-SDR model (IC_InVEST). Both models were applied to the Taleghan watershed in Iran, utilizing a digital elevation model (DEM) combined with spatial datasets, including land cover, soil type, and rainfall erosivity. The evaluation employed statistical tools such as correlation analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, linear regression, and root mean square error (RMSE) to quantify model performance against field-based sediment connectivity (FIC) data. Results indicate that IC_InVEST achieved a higher correlation (r = 0.88) with FIC and explained 77 % of sediment variation, outperforming IC_B which explained 62 %. However, limitations in field data necessitate cautious interpretation. This research highlights the importance of integrating both topographic and process-based factors in sediment connectivity assessment and underscores the need for standardized methodologies and extensive field validation. Furthermore, a regression-based adjustment was proposed to enhance comparability between indices. The findings suggest that model selection should be guided by data availability, watershed characteristics, and specific management objectives. InVEST-SDR’s relatively low data requirements make it practical for identifying erosion-prone hotspots, facilitating proactive watershed protection. Future research should focus on refining sediment connectivity models and expanding validation efforts to improve their reliability across diverse environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 109500"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225008021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sediment connectivity is a fundamental concept for understanding sediment transport processes and managing watershed health. This study addresses the existing gap in comprehensive comparisons of sediment connectivity indices by evaluating two widely used methods: the structural-based Borselli index (IC_B) and the process-based InVEST-SDR model (IC_InVEST). Both models were applied to the Taleghan watershed in Iran, utilizing a digital elevation model (DEM) combined with spatial datasets, including land cover, soil type, and rainfall erosivity. The evaluation employed statistical tools such as correlation analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, linear regression, and root mean square error (RMSE) to quantify model performance against field-based sediment connectivity (FIC) data. Results indicate that IC_InVEST achieved a higher correlation (r = 0.88) with FIC and explained 77 % of sediment variation, outperforming IC_B which explained 62 %. However, limitations in field data necessitate cautious interpretation. This research highlights the importance of integrating both topographic and process-based factors in sediment connectivity assessment and underscores the need for standardized methodologies and extensive field validation. Furthermore, a regression-based adjustment was proposed to enhance comparability between indices. The findings suggest that model selection should be guided by data availability, watershed characteristics, and specific management objectives. InVEST-SDR’s relatively low data requirements make it practical for identifying erosion-prone hotspots, facilitating proactive watershed protection. Future research should focus on refining sediment connectivity models and expanding validation efforts to improve their reliability across diverse environments.
期刊介绍:
Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment.
Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.