Assessing sediment connectivity with the InVEST model and a structural approach: a case study

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mohammad Ali Hilou, Seyed Abbas Hosseini , Ahmad Sharafati
{"title":"Assessing sediment connectivity with the InVEST model and a structural approach: a case study","authors":"Mohammad Ali Hilou,&nbsp;Seyed Abbas Hosseini ,&nbsp;Ahmad Sharafati","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sediment connectivity is a fundamental concept for understanding sediment transport processes and managing watershed health. This study addresses the existing gap in comprehensive comparisons of sediment connectivity indices by evaluating two widely used methods: the structural-based Borselli index (IC_B) and the process-based InVEST-SDR model (IC_InVEST). Both models were applied to the Taleghan watershed in Iran, utilizing a digital elevation model (DEM) combined with spatial datasets, including land cover, soil type, and rainfall erosivity. The evaluation employed statistical tools such as correlation analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, linear regression, and root mean square error (RMSE) to quantify model performance against field-based sediment connectivity (FIC) data. Results indicate that IC_InVEST achieved a higher correlation (r = 0.88) with FIC and explained 77 % of sediment variation, outperforming IC_B which explained 62 %. However, limitations in field data necessitate cautious interpretation. This research highlights the importance of integrating both topographic and process-based factors in sediment connectivity assessment and underscores the need for standardized methodologies and extensive field validation. Furthermore, a regression-based adjustment was proposed to enhance comparability between indices. The findings suggest that model selection should be guided by data availability, watershed characteristics, and specific management objectives. InVEST-SDR’s relatively low data requirements make it practical for identifying erosion-prone hotspots, facilitating proactive watershed protection. Future research should focus on refining sediment connectivity models and expanding validation efforts to improve their reliability across diverse environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 109500"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225008021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sediment connectivity is a fundamental concept for understanding sediment transport processes and managing watershed health. This study addresses the existing gap in comprehensive comparisons of sediment connectivity indices by evaluating two widely used methods: the structural-based Borselli index (IC_B) and the process-based InVEST-SDR model (IC_InVEST). Both models were applied to the Taleghan watershed in Iran, utilizing a digital elevation model (DEM) combined with spatial datasets, including land cover, soil type, and rainfall erosivity. The evaluation employed statistical tools such as correlation analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, linear regression, and root mean square error (RMSE) to quantify model performance against field-based sediment connectivity (FIC) data. Results indicate that IC_InVEST achieved a higher correlation (r = 0.88) with FIC and explained 77 % of sediment variation, outperforming IC_B which explained 62 %. However, limitations in field data necessitate cautious interpretation. This research highlights the importance of integrating both topographic and process-based factors in sediment connectivity assessment and underscores the need for standardized methodologies and extensive field validation. Furthermore, a regression-based adjustment was proposed to enhance comparability between indices. The findings suggest that model selection should be guided by data availability, watershed characteristics, and specific management objectives. InVEST-SDR’s relatively low data requirements make it practical for identifying erosion-prone hotspots, facilitating proactive watershed protection. Future research should focus on refining sediment connectivity models and expanding validation efforts to improve their reliability across diverse environments.
用InVEST模型和结构方法评估沉积物连通性:一个案例研究
泥沙连通性是理解泥沙输送过程和管理流域健康的基本概念。本研究通过对基于结构的Borselli指数(IC_B)和基于过程的InVEST-SDR模型(IC_InVEST)这两种广泛使用的方法进行评价,解决了沉积物连通性指数综合比较中存在的差距。这两种模型都应用于伊朗的Taleghan流域,利用数字高程模型(DEM)结合空间数据集,包括土地覆盖、土壤类型和降雨侵蚀力。评估采用了相关分析、Wilcoxon符号秩检验、线性回归和均方根误差(RMSE)等统计工具,根据现场沉积物连通性(FIC)数据量化模型的性能。结果表明,IC_InVEST与FIC具有较高的相关性(r = 0.88),解释了77%的泥沙变化,优于IC_B,解释了62%。然而,由于实地资料的限制,需要谨慎解释。这项研究强调了在沉积物连通性评估中整合地形和基于过程的因素的重要性,并强调了标准化方法和广泛的现场验证的必要性。此外,还提出了一种基于回归的调整,以增强指数之间的可比性。研究结果表明,模式选择应以数据可用性、流域特征和具体管理目标为指导。InVEST-SDR对数据的要求相对较低,这使得它能够识别易受侵蚀的热点地区,促进主动的流域保护。未来的研究应侧重于完善沉积物连通性模型,并扩大验证工作,以提高其在不同环境中的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信