Mega-analysis of no-tillage and reduced tillage impacts on crop yields and greenhouse gas emissions

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Lovish Kasrija , Dafeng Hui , Avedananda Ray , Wei Ren , Lixin Wang , Philip A. Fay , Douglas R. Smith , Jianwei Li , Prabodh Illukpitiya , Hanqin Tian
{"title":"Mega-analysis of no-tillage and reduced tillage impacts on crop yields and greenhouse gas emissions","authors":"Lovish Kasrija ,&nbsp;Dafeng Hui ,&nbsp;Avedananda Ray ,&nbsp;Wei Ren ,&nbsp;Lixin Wang ,&nbsp;Philip A. Fay ,&nbsp;Douglas R. Smith ,&nbsp;Jianwei Li ,&nbsp;Prabodh Illukpitiya ,&nbsp;Hanqin Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agriculture contributes 11 % of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). Conservation tillage practices such as no-tillage (NT) and reduced tillage (RT) are promoted as climate-smart strategies to mitigate GHG emissions without compromising crop yields. However, existing meta-analyses have produced contradictory results regarding the effects of these practices on crop yields and soil GHG emissions. To address these discrepancies, we conducted a mega-analysis, synthesizing data from 30 meta-analyses to comprehensively assess the impacts of the NT, RT, and mixed NT+RT on crop yields and GHG emissions. Our results showed that the tillage treatments (NT, RT, and mixed NT+RT) exhibited no significant overall effect on crop yields. NT did not influence soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and none of the tillage treatments influenced soil CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. However, NT increased soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 10.5 % (0.010, 95 % Confidence interval: 0.067, 0.132), whereas RT and NT+RT had no significant effect on soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. The varied impacts of tillage treatments were attributed to the interactions among experimental settings, soil properties, and agriculture practices such as crop residue management, irrigation type, and nitrogen fertilizer application rate. This mega-analysis provides a more comprehensive quantification than individual meta-analyses, offering valuable insights into the impacts of conservation tillage practices on crop yields and GHG emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"334 ","pages":"Article 110167"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025004320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agriculture contributes 11 % of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Conservation tillage practices such as no-tillage (NT) and reduced tillage (RT) are promoted as climate-smart strategies to mitigate GHG emissions without compromising crop yields. However, existing meta-analyses have produced contradictory results regarding the effects of these practices on crop yields and soil GHG emissions. To address these discrepancies, we conducted a mega-analysis, synthesizing data from 30 meta-analyses to comprehensively assess the impacts of the NT, RT, and mixed NT+RT on crop yields and GHG emissions. Our results showed that the tillage treatments (NT, RT, and mixed NT+RT) exhibited no significant overall effect on crop yields. NT did not influence soil CO2 emissions, and none of the tillage treatments influenced soil CH4 emissions. However, NT increased soil N2O emissions by 10.5 % (0.010, 95 % Confidence interval: 0.067, 0.132), whereas RT and NT+RT had no significant effect on soil N2O emissions. The varied impacts of tillage treatments were attributed to the interactions among experimental settings, soil properties, and agriculture practices such as crop residue management, irrigation type, and nitrogen fertilizer application rate. This mega-analysis provides a more comprehensive quantification than individual meta-analyses, offering valuable insights into the impacts of conservation tillage practices on crop yields and GHG emissions.
免耕和少耕对作物产量和温室气体排放影响的大型分析
农业占人为温室气体(GHG)排放总量的11. %,包括二氧化碳(CO2)、甲烷(CH4)和一氧化二氮(N2O)。免耕(NT)和少耕(RT)等保护性耕作做法作为气候智能型战略得到推广,以在不影响作物产量的情况下减少温室气体排放。然而,关于这些做法对作物产量和土壤温室气体排放的影响,现有的荟萃分析得出了相互矛盾的结果。为了解决这些差异,我们进行了一项大型分析,综合了30项荟萃分析的数据,全面评估了NT、RT和混合NT+RT对作物产量和温室气体排放的影响。结果表明,不同耕作方式(免耕、免耕和免耕+免耕)对作物产量总体影响不显著。NT不影响土壤CO2排放,所有耕作处理均不影响土壤CH4排放。然而,NT增加了土壤N2O排放10.5 %(0.010,95 %可信区间:0.067,0.132),而RT和NT+RT对土壤N2O排放无显著影响。不同耕作方式对土壤的影响是试验环境、土壤性质和作物残茬管理、灌溉方式和氮肥施用量等农业实践相互作用的结果。这项大型分析提供了比单个元分析更全面的量化,为保护性耕作对作物产量和温室气体排放的影响提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信