Machine learning-Powered estimation of simultaneous removal of sulfamethoxazole, 17-β Estradiol, and carbamazepine via photocatalytic degradation with M-Al@ZnO
Arkadeepto Majumder , Pubali Mandal , Manoj Kumar Yadav , Alagu Lavanya T , Lavanya B , Abhradeep Majumder
{"title":"Machine learning-Powered estimation of simultaneous removal of sulfamethoxazole, 17-β Estradiol, and carbamazepine via photocatalytic degradation with M-Al@ZnO","authors":"Arkadeepto Majumder , Pubali Mandal , Manoj Kumar Yadav , Alagu Lavanya T , Lavanya B , Abhradeep Majumder","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2025.122989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The recalcitrant nature of emerging contaminants in water has raised serious concerns, and addressing their removal aligns with the aims of SDG 6. This has necessitated research on photocatalysis, but its cost-intensive nature requires thorough optimization, which is a tedious manual process. Hence, in this study, different machine learning (ML) models (Elastic-Net, Lasso, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)) have been used to model the photocatalytic degradation of sulfamethoxazole, 17β-Estradiol, and carbamazepine in the presence of M-Al@ZnO. The training dataset included removal of the 3 contaminants, with pH varied from 2 to 10 (M-Al@ZnO dose = 0.5 g/L and contaminant concentration = 1000 μg/L), M-Al@ZnO dose varied from 0.1 to 1 g/L (pH = 8, and contaminant concentration = 1000 μg/L), and contaminant concentrations varied from 500 to 2000 μg/L (pH = 8 and M-Al@ZnO dose = 0.5 g/L). Across all the models, GB exhibited the most promising results (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.9648 and RMSE: 3.9581). SHAP analysis revealed that irradiation time (∼60–85 %) was the dominant factor, followed by pH (∼20–45 %) and dose (∼5–15 %), with pollutant concentrations having minimal or negative impact on removal. The models were then used to predict data at non-experimented points (pH varied between 2 and 10, dose varied between 0.1 and 1/g/L, and time varied between 20 and 120 min). Contour plots generated using GB-predicted data explained the interactive effects of dependent variables and hinted that at optimum conditions (pH = 8, Dose = 0.7 g/L), the system can effectively remove 90 % of contaminants within 90 min.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":312,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research","volume":"286 ","pages":"Article 122989"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512502242X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The recalcitrant nature of emerging contaminants in water has raised serious concerns, and addressing their removal aligns with the aims of SDG 6. This has necessitated research on photocatalysis, but its cost-intensive nature requires thorough optimization, which is a tedious manual process. Hence, in this study, different machine learning (ML) models (Elastic-Net, Lasso, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)) have been used to model the photocatalytic degradation of sulfamethoxazole, 17β-Estradiol, and carbamazepine in the presence of M-Al@ZnO. The training dataset included removal of the 3 contaminants, with pH varied from 2 to 10 (M-Al@ZnO dose = 0.5 g/L and contaminant concentration = 1000 μg/L), M-Al@ZnO dose varied from 0.1 to 1 g/L (pH = 8, and contaminant concentration = 1000 μg/L), and contaminant concentrations varied from 500 to 2000 μg/L (pH = 8 and M-Al@ZnO dose = 0.5 g/L). Across all the models, GB exhibited the most promising results (R2: 0.9648 and RMSE: 3.9581). SHAP analysis revealed that irradiation time (∼60–85 %) was the dominant factor, followed by pH (∼20–45 %) and dose (∼5–15 %), with pollutant concentrations having minimal or negative impact on removal. The models were then used to predict data at non-experimented points (pH varied between 2 and 10, dose varied between 0.1 and 1/g/L, and time varied between 20 and 120 min). Contour plots generated using GB-predicted data explained the interactive effects of dependent variables and hinted that at optimum conditions (pH = 8, Dose = 0.7 g/L), the system can effectively remove 90 % of contaminants within 90 min.
期刊介绍:
The Environmental Research journal presents a broad range of interdisciplinary research, focused on addressing worldwide environmental concerns and featuring innovative findings. Our publication strives to explore relevant anthropogenic issues across various environmental sectors, showcasing practical applications in real-life settings.