Contrasting responses of surface and subsurface soil microbiome to ecological restoration in two types of steppe because of different changes in plant and soil properties

IF 5 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Xiaojiang Yang , Xiangjun Yun , Wenbo Zhang , Paul C. Struik , Shenyi Jiang , Xiangjian Tu , Ke Jin , Zhen Wang
{"title":"Contrasting responses of surface and subsurface soil microbiome to ecological restoration in two types of steppe because of different changes in plant and soil properties","authors":"Xiaojiang Yang ,&nbsp;Xiangjun Yun ,&nbsp;Wenbo Zhang ,&nbsp;Paul C. Struik ,&nbsp;Shenyi Jiang ,&nbsp;Xiangjian Tu ,&nbsp;Ke Jin ,&nbsp;Zhen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grazing exclusion contributes to the restoration of degraded grassland, including its soil. Whether restoration merely affects the surface layer or also penetrates into the subsurface layer remains unclear. Therefore, taking the typical steppe and desert steppe in the Mongolian Plateau as cases, this study investigated the effects of grazing exclusion on soil microbial diversity, composition, and function in the soil surface (0–10 cm) and subsurface (10–30 cm). Bacterial diversity was higher in the surface layer than in the subsurface layer in the typical steppe, but the opposite was true in the desert steppe. Grazing exclusion significantly increased fungal diversity in the surface layer (typical steppe) or in both layers (desert steppe). Grazing exclusion significantly altered bacterial (Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria) and fungal (Basidiomycota, Ascomycota) community composition in both steppe types. In the typical steppe, both bacterial and fungal communities differed between soil layers, whereas only bacterial communities varied between soil layers in the desert steppe. Co-occurrence network stability correlated with bacterial (not fungal) community composition and was linked to soil nutrients (e.g., dissolved organic carbon, soil organic carbon, and total nitrogen) across steppe types and soil layers. Overall, our research showed that grazing exclusion showed higher proportion and stronger functioning of soil microbiome associated with plant growth promotion, nutrient acquisition, or pathogen suppression in the typical and desert steppes. The difference in microbiome between the surface layer and subsurface layer of the typical steppe depended on bacteria and fungi, while that difference only depended on bacteria for the desert steppe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 106493"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325006316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grazing exclusion contributes to the restoration of degraded grassland, including its soil. Whether restoration merely affects the surface layer or also penetrates into the subsurface layer remains unclear. Therefore, taking the typical steppe and desert steppe in the Mongolian Plateau as cases, this study investigated the effects of grazing exclusion on soil microbial diversity, composition, and function in the soil surface (0–10 cm) and subsurface (10–30 cm). Bacterial diversity was higher in the surface layer than in the subsurface layer in the typical steppe, but the opposite was true in the desert steppe. Grazing exclusion significantly increased fungal diversity in the surface layer (typical steppe) or in both layers (desert steppe). Grazing exclusion significantly altered bacterial (Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria) and fungal (Basidiomycota, Ascomycota) community composition in both steppe types. In the typical steppe, both bacterial and fungal communities differed between soil layers, whereas only bacterial communities varied between soil layers in the desert steppe. Co-occurrence network stability correlated with bacterial (not fungal) community composition and was linked to soil nutrients (e.g., dissolved organic carbon, soil organic carbon, and total nitrogen) across steppe types and soil layers. Overall, our research showed that grazing exclusion showed higher proportion and stronger functioning of soil microbiome associated with plant growth promotion, nutrient acquisition, or pathogen suppression in the typical and desert steppes. The difference in microbiome between the surface layer and subsurface layer of the typical steppe depended on bacteria and fungi, while that difference only depended on bacteria for the desert steppe.
两种类型草原植物和土壤性质变化对地表和地下土壤微生物组对生态恢复的响应对比
禁止放牧有助于退化草地及其土壤的恢复。恢复是否只影响表层还是也渗透到次表层尚不清楚。因此,本研究以蒙古高原典型草原和荒漠草原为例,研究了放牧对土壤表层(0 ~ 10 cm)和地下(10 ~ 30 cm)土壤微生物多样性、组成和功能的影响。典型草原表层细菌多样性高于亚表层,荒漠草原则相反。不放牧显著增加了表层(典型草原)或两层(荒漠草原)真菌多样性。放牧排除显著改变了两种草原类型的细菌(放线菌门、变形菌门)和真菌(担子菌门、子囊菌门)群落组成。在典型草原中,细菌和真菌群落在不同土层之间存在差异,而在荒漠草原中,只有细菌群落在不同土层之间存在差异。共生网络稳定性与细菌(非真菌)群落组成相关,并与不同草原类型和土层的土壤养分(如溶解有机碳、土壤有机碳和全氮)有关。综上所述,放牧对典型草原和荒漠草原土壤微生物组在促进植物生长、养分获取或抑制病原菌等方面的作用更高、功能更强。典型草原表层和亚表层微生物群的差异主要取决于细菌和真菌,而荒漠草原的差异仅取决于细菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信