Modeling Net-Zero: A comparative analysis of deep decarbonization studies of the US electric system

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Ira Shavel, Emma Naden
{"title":"Modeling Net-Zero: A comparative analysis of deep decarbonization studies of the US electric system","authors":"Ira Shavel,&nbsp;Emma Naden","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of 10 recent deep decarbonization, model-based studies, focusing on future low-carbon US electricity systems. The research focuses on the structure of a decarbonized electric system, identifies key enabling technologies, and explores the role of corporate buyers in advancing these technologies, the economic and physical characteristics captured in the studies and explicitly does not consider the political issue of equity of distribution of the technologies. Key findings reveal that wind and solar resources could supply 77–96 % of generation needs, but achieving net-zero emissions economically will likely require additional “clean firm” technologies such as nuclear, natural gas with carbon capture and storage (NGCCS), biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), geothermal, and hydroelectric power, or the addition of long-duration energy storage to supply energy during extended periods of low renewables output. Our analysis highlights the significant role of expanded transmission infrastructure, flexible demand measures, and the importance of corporate investments in emerging technologies. This review underscores the economic and operational feasibility of achieving net-zero emissions and offers actionable insights for policymakers and researchers. Recommended future steps in modeling and detailed analysis include more attention to the modeling of operational reliability as well as planned resilience and to the demonstration of the flexibility value of demand-side resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116337"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212501010X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of 10 recent deep decarbonization, model-based studies, focusing on future low-carbon US electricity systems. The research focuses on the structure of a decarbonized electric system, identifies key enabling technologies, and explores the role of corporate buyers in advancing these technologies, the economic and physical characteristics captured in the studies and explicitly does not consider the political issue of equity of distribution of the technologies. Key findings reveal that wind and solar resources could supply 77–96 % of generation needs, but achieving net-zero emissions economically will likely require additional “clean firm” technologies such as nuclear, natural gas with carbon capture and storage (NGCCS), biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), geothermal, and hydroelectric power, or the addition of long-duration energy storage to supply energy during extended periods of low renewables output. Our analysis highlights the significant role of expanded transmission infrastructure, flexible demand measures, and the importance of corporate investments in emerging technologies. This review underscores the economic and operational feasibility of achieving net-zero emissions and offers actionable insights for policymakers and researchers. Recommended future steps in modeling and detailed analysis include more attention to the modeling of operational reliability as well as planned resilience and to the demonstration of the flexibility value of demand-side resources.
建模净零:美国电力系统深度脱碳研究的比较分析
本文对最近10项深度脱碳、基于模型的研究进行了全面分析,重点关注未来低碳的美国电力系统。该研究关注脱碳电力系统的结构,确定关键的使能技术,并探讨企业买家在推进这些技术方面的作用,研究中捕获的经济和物理特征,明确不考虑技术分配公平的政治问题。主要研究结果显示,风能和太阳能资源可以满足77 - 96%的发电需求,但经济上实现净零排放可能需要额外的“清洁公司”技术,如核能、天然气碳捕集与封存(NGCCS)、生物质能碳捕集与封存(BECCS)、地热和水力发电,或增加长期能源储存,以便在可再生能源产量较低的长时间内提供能源。我们的分析强调了扩大输电基础设施、灵活的需求措施以及企业对新兴技术投资的重要性。这篇综述强调了实现净零排放的经济和运营可行性,并为政策制定者和研究人员提供了可行的见解。建议未来建模和详细分析的步骤包括更多地关注运行可靠性和计划弹性的建模,以及需求侧资源的灵活性价值的论证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信