Implementation of clinic-based data capture in a real-world epilepsy clinic

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Gabriel Martz , Isshori Gurung , Ya-Huei Li
{"title":"Implementation of clinic-based data capture in a real-world epilepsy clinic","authors":"Gabriel Martz ,&nbsp;Isshori Gurung ,&nbsp;Ya-Huei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Capturing structured clinical data during routine care remains an elusive but potentially high-impact goal. Learning Health Systems (LHS) are intended to capture data and provide evidence-based guidance, improving the care clinicians provide. Our epilepsy center implemented software to enable patient survey delivery and discrete data entry by clinicians during clinic visits. Here we evaluate the initial 18 months of this process. There were 2779 visits by 1664 patients seeing 12 clinicians. Manual entry of any data by clinicians occurred in 59.5 % of visits, and entry of all data domains occurred in 48.9 %, dominated by 3 clinicians who completed 74 % of these visits. Clinician manual entry rate was slightly higher among White, non-Hispanic and male patient visits, those with Medicaid or Self Pay as primary insurance, and among follow up visits (vs new patient). Patient surveys were all completed in 16.2 % and at least one survey in 54.7 % of visits. Higher rate of patient survey completion was associated with English speakers, in person visits (vs virtual), new patient visits, and private insurance. There was no association of survey completion with race, ethnicity or diagnosis. Overall, clinical data capture is achievable when there is strong clinician engagement and optimization of clinic workflows to enable survey completion. Care should be taken to ensure implementation captures representative data and avoids systematically marginalizing people facing social barriers to healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 110730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025004706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capturing structured clinical data during routine care remains an elusive but potentially high-impact goal. Learning Health Systems (LHS) are intended to capture data and provide evidence-based guidance, improving the care clinicians provide. Our epilepsy center implemented software to enable patient survey delivery and discrete data entry by clinicians during clinic visits. Here we evaluate the initial 18 months of this process. There were 2779 visits by 1664 patients seeing 12 clinicians. Manual entry of any data by clinicians occurred in 59.5 % of visits, and entry of all data domains occurred in 48.9 %, dominated by 3 clinicians who completed 74 % of these visits. Clinician manual entry rate was slightly higher among White, non-Hispanic and male patient visits, those with Medicaid or Self Pay as primary insurance, and among follow up visits (vs new patient). Patient surveys were all completed in 16.2 % and at least one survey in 54.7 % of visits. Higher rate of patient survey completion was associated with English speakers, in person visits (vs virtual), new patient visits, and private insurance. There was no association of survey completion with race, ethnicity or diagnosis. Overall, clinical data capture is achievable when there is strong clinician engagement and optimization of clinic workflows to enable survey completion. Care should be taken to ensure implementation captures representative data and avoids systematically marginalizing people facing social barriers to healthcare.
在现实世界癫痫诊所实现基于临床的数据捕获
在常规护理中获取结构化临床数据仍然是一个难以捉摸但具有潜在高影响力的目标。学习型卫生系统(LHS)旨在获取数据并提供循证指导,改善临床医生提供的护理。我们的癫痫中心实施了软件,使临床医生能够在门诊访问期间提供患者调查和离散数据输入。在此,我们对这一过程的最初18个月进行评估。共有1664名患者和12名临床医生进行了2779次访问。临床医生手动输入任何数据的比例为59.5%,所有数据域的输入比例为48.9%,由3名临床医生主导,他们完成了74%的就诊。在白人、非西班牙裔和男性患者、医疗补助或自付作为主要保险的患者以及随访患者(与新患者相比)中,临床医生手工进入率略高。16.2%的患者完成了全部调查,54.7%的患者至少完成了一次调查。较高的患者调查完成率与说英语的人、亲自访问(与虚拟)、新患者访问和私人保险有关。调查完成与种族、民族或诊断没有关联。总的来说,当有强大的临床医生参与和优化临床工作流程以完成调查时,临床数据捕获是可以实现的。应注意确保执行工作能够获取有代表性的数据,并避免系统性地将在医疗保健方面面临社会障碍的人边缘化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信