Comparative evaluation of growth, CO2 capture, and biomass biochemical composition between Chlorococcum humicola and Chlorella vulgaris under varying CO2 concentrations and simulated cement flue gas

IF 4.5 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Jareeluk Plengsakul , Shiva Rezaei Motlagh , Sorawit Powtongsook , Pichaya In-na , Man Kee Lam , Kasidit Nootong
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of growth, CO2 capture, and biomass biochemical composition between Chlorococcum humicola and Chlorella vulgaris under varying CO2 concentrations and simulated cement flue gas","authors":"Jareeluk Plengsakul ,&nbsp;Shiva Rezaei Motlagh ,&nbsp;Sorawit Powtongsook ,&nbsp;Pichaya In-na ,&nbsp;Man Kee Lam ,&nbsp;Kasidit Nootong","doi":"10.1016/j.algal.2025.104334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comparative evaluation of <em>Chlorococcum humicola</em> and <em>Chlorella vulgaris</em> cultivated under varying CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations (0.04 % to 20 %) and simulated cement flue gas. The highest biomass concentrations (869 mg/L for <em>C. humicola</em> and 1284 mg/L for <em>C. vulgaris</em>), together with the maximum CO<sub>2</sub> fixation rates (154 mg/L⋅d for <em>C. humicola</em> and 214 mg/L⋅d for <em>C. vulgaris</em>), were observed at 5 % CO<sub>2</sub>. Both microalgae demonstrated tolerance to simulated cement flue gas (15.50 % CO<sub>2</sub>, 220 ppm NO, and 1.3 ppm SO<sub>2</sub>), achieving biomass concentrations and CO<sub>2</sub> fixation rates comparable to those observed under 10 % and 15 % CO<sub>2</sub> as well as ambient air. <em>C. humicola</em> yielded higher carotenoid contents than <em>C. vulgaris</em> across the tested CO<sub>2</sub> range. At 5 % CO<sub>2</sub>, both microalgae exhibited the highest carotenoid contents, with neoxanthin and violaxanthin predominating in <em>C. humicola</em> while lutein predominated in <em>C. vulgaris.</em> Although <em>C. humicola</em> contained lower protein contents (32.55 % to 40.25 %) compared to <em>C. vulgaris</em>, it remains a promising alternative as live feed for aquacultures and as a source of bioactive compounds. Notably, unlike <em>C. vulgaris</em>, <em>C. humicola</em> formed large aggregates, which allowed simple biomass harvesting via filtration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7855,"journal":{"name":"Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104334"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221192642500445X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comparative evaluation of Chlorococcum humicola and Chlorella vulgaris cultivated under varying CO2 concentrations (0.04 % to 20 %) and simulated cement flue gas. The highest biomass concentrations (869 mg/L for C. humicola and 1284 mg/L for C. vulgaris), together with the maximum CO2 fixation rates (154 mg/L⋅d for C. humicola and 214 mg/L⋅d for C. vulgaris), were observed at 5 % CO2. Both microalgae demonstrated tolerance to simulated cement flue gas (15.50 % CO2, 220 ppm NO, and 1.3 ppm SO2), achieving biomass concentrations and CO2 fixation rates comparable to those observed under 10 % and 15 % CO2 as well as ambient air. C. humicola yielded higher carotenoid contents than C. vulgaris across the tested CO2 range. At 5 % CO2, both microalgae exhibited the highest carotenoid contents, with neoxanthin and violaxanthin predominating in C. humicola while lutein predominated in C. vulgaris. Although C. humicola contained lower protein contents (32.55 % to 40.25 %) compared to C. vulgaris, it remains a promising alternative as live feed for aquacultures and as a source of bioactive compounds. Notably, unlike C. vulgaris, C. humicola formed large aggregates, which allowed simple biomass harvesting via filtration.
不同CO2浓度和模拟水泥烟气下腐殖质小球藻和普通小球藻生长、CO2捕获和生物质生化组成的比较评价
本研究对不同CO2浓度(0.04% ~ 20%)和模拟水泥烟气下栽培的腐殖质绿球藻和普通小球藻进行了比较评价。在5% CO2处理下,葎草生物量最高(869 mg/L),俗草生物量最高(1284 mg/L), CO2固定速率最高(154 mg/L·d, 214 mg/L·d)。两种微藻都表现出对模拟水泥烟气(15.50% CO2, 220 ppm NO和1.3 ppm SO2)的耐受性,实现了与在10%和15% CO2以及环境空气下观察到的生物质浓度和CO2固定率相当的水平。在测试的CO2范围内,腐殖质伞的类胡萝卜素含量高于普通伞。在5% CO2条件下,两种微藻的类胡萝卜素含量均最高,humicola以新黄质和紫黄质为主,而C. vulgaris以叶黄素为主。尽管葎草的蛋白质含量(32.55% ~ 40.25%)低于普通葎草,但它仍然是一种有前途的水产养殖活饲料和生物活性化合物的来源。值得注意的是,与C. vulgaris不同,C. humicola形成了大的聚集体,这使得通过过滤可以简单地收获生物量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts
Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.80%
发文量
332
期刊介绍: Algal Research is an international phycology journal covering all areas of emerging technologies in algae biology, biomass production, cultivation, harvesting, extraction, bioproducts, biorefinery, engineering, and econometrics. Algae is defined to include cyanobacteria, microalgae, and protists and symbionts of interest in biotechnology. The journal publishes original research and reviews for the following scope: algal biology, including but not exclusive to: phylogeny, biodiversity, molecular traits, metabolic regulation, and genetic engineering, algal cultivation, e.g. phototrophic systems, heterotrophic systems, and mixotrophic systems, algal harvesting and extraction systems, biotechnology to convert algal biomass and components into biofuels and bioproducts, e.g., nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, animal feed, plastics, etc. algal products and their economic assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信