Meta-analysis of in vitro studies on the effects of rumen-protected oils on rumen fermentation products, methane mitigation, microbial populations, and feed digestibility

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Hajrian Rizqi Albarki , Muhammad Sulaiman Daulai , Raihani Indah Kusuma , Chanon Suntara , Chuleemas Boonthai Iwai , Anuraga Jayanegara , Anusorn Cherdthong
{"title":"Meta-analysis of in vitro studies on the effects of rumen-protected oils on rumen fermentation products, methane mitigation, microbial populations, and feed digestibility","authors":"Hajrian Rizqi Albarki ,&nbsp;Muhammad Sulaiman Daulai ,&nbsp;Raihani Indah Kusuma ,&nbsp;Chanon Suntara ,&nbsp;Chuleemas Boonthai Iwai ,&nbsp;Anuraga Jayanegara ,&nbsp;Anusorn Cherdthong","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oil is commonly supplemented in livestock diets to increase energy intake and fat consumption. Protected oils are designed to bypass rumen fermentation, reducing biohydrogenation and providing fatty acids that livestock can efficiently utilize. To date, no meta-analyses have been conducted to assess the effects of protected oil on rumen fermentation <em>in vitro</em>. This study investigated the influence of protected oil on rumen fermentation products, microbial populations, and digestibility through <em>in vitro</em> experiments. Research problem formulation in this meta-analysis study uses the PICO method. Meta-analysis was conducted using the PRISMA method for the selection of database development. Data collection was collected using the data tabulation process, and obtained the range of levels of protected oil used was between 1 % and 35 % of DM. The analysis process in this study used OpenMEE, Medcalc, and Microsoft excel applications. The meta-analysis revealed that protected oil significantly reduced (P &lt; 0.05) methane (CH₄) production, total protozoa, and total bacterial counts. Protected oil was also associated with an increase (P &lt; 0.05) in total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), although meta-regression indicated that this effect was not strongly correlated with dosage. Protected oil did not significantly affect (P &gt; 0.05) pH and NH₃-N levels. It also significantly reduced (P &lt; 0.05) <em>in vitro</em> dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), <em>in vitro</em> organic matter digestibility (IVOMD), and <em>in vitro</em> neutral detergent fiber digestibility (IVNDFD), while significantly increasing (P &lt; 0.05) <em>in vitro</em> crude protein digestibility (IVCPD). Meta-regression revealed weak correlations between protected oil levels and IVDMD (R² = 0.19), CH₄ (R² = 0.02), and TVFA (R² = 0.01), indicating that factors beyond dosage likely influenced these outcomes. In the subgroup meta-analysis of IVDMD, TVFA, and CH₄ across oil types, protection methods, and control groups, varying results were observed. In conclusion, protected oil supplementation may enhance <em>in vitro</em> VFA production and help mitigate CH₄ emissions, although its effects are not clearly dose-dependent. This study highlights the potential of protected oils for nutritional and environmental benefits in ruminant diets, while underscoring the need for further standardized research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"329 ","pages":"Article 116514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125003098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oil is commonly supplemented in livestock diets to increase energy intake and fat consumption. Protected oils are designed to bypass rumen fermentation, reducing biohydrogenation and providing fatty acids that livestock can efficiently utilize. To date, no meta-analyses have been conducted to assess the effects of protected oil on rumen fermentation in vitro. This study investigated the influence of protected oil on rumen fermentation products, microbial populations, and digestibility through in vitro experiments. Research problem formulation in this meta-analysis study uses the PICO method. Meta-analysis was conducted using the PRISMA method for the selection of database development. Data collection was collected using the data tabulation process, and obtained the range of levels of protected oil used was between 1 % and 35 % of DM. The analysis process in this study used OpenMEE, Medcalc, and Microsoft excel applications. The meta-analysis revealed that protected oil significantly reduced (P < 0.05) methane (CH₄) production, total protozoa, and total bacterial counts. Protected oil was also associated with an increase (P < 0.05) in total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), although meta-regression indicated that this effect was not strongly correlated with dosage. Protected oil did not significantly affect (P > 0.05) pH and NH₃-N levels. It also significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD), and in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility (IVNDFD), while significantly increasing (P < 0.05) in vitro crude protein digestibility (IVCPD). Meta-regression revealed weak correlations between protected oil levels and IVDMD (R² = 0.19), CH₄ (R² = 0.02), and TVFA (R² = 0.01), indicating that factors beyond dosage likely influenced these outcomes. In the subgroup meta-analysis of IVDMD, TVFA, and CH₄ across oil types, protection methods, and control groups, varying results were observed. In conclusion, protected oil supplementation may enhance in vitro VFA production and help mitigate CH₄ emissions, although its effects are not clearly dose-dependent. This study highlights the potential of protected oils for nutritional and environmental benefits in ruminant diets, while underscoring the need for further standardized research.
瘤胃保护油对瘤胃发酵产物、甲烷减排、微生物种群和饲料消化率影响的体外研究荟萃分析
通常在牲畜日粮中添加油以增加能量摄入和脂肪消耗。保护油的设计绕过瘤胃发酵,减少生物氢化并提供牲畜可以有效利用的脂肪酸。迄今为止,还没有进行meta分析来评估保护油对体外瘤胃发酵的影响。本研究通过体外实验研究了保护油对瘤胃发酵产物、微生物种群和消化率的影响。本荟萃分析研究的研究问题制定使用PICO方法。采用PRISMA方法进行meta分析,选择数据库开发方案。采用数据制表法收集数据,得出保护油的使用水平范围为DM的1 %至35 %。本研究的分析过程使用OpenMEE、Medcalc和Microsoft excel应用程序。荟萃分析显示,保护油显著降低了(P <; 0.05)甲烷(CH₄)产量、原虫总数和细菌总数。保护油也与总挥发性脂肪酸(TVFA)的增加有关(P <; 0.05),尽管meta回归表明这种影响与剂量不强相关。保护油对pH和NH₃-N水平没有显著影响(P >; 0.05)。显著降低了体外干物质消化率(IVDMD)、体外有机物消化率(IVOMD)和体外中性洗涤纤维消化率(IVNDFD) (P <; 0.05),显著提高了体外粗蛋白质消化率(P <; 0.05)。meta回归显示,保护油水平与IVDMD (R²= 0.19)、CH₄(R²= 0.02)和TVFA (R²= 0.01)之间存在弱相关性,表明剂量以外的因素可能影响这些结果。在不同油类型、保护方法和对照组的IVDMD、TVFA和CH₄亚组荟萃分析中,观察到不同的结果。综上所述,保护油的补充可能会增加体外VFA的产生,并有助于减少CH₄的排放,尽管其效果并不明显依赖于剂量。这项研究强调了保护油在反刍动物日粮中具有营养和环境效益的潜力,同时强调了进一步标准化研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信