Best Systemic Therapy With or Without Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Men With Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The RAMPP Randomised Controlled Trial
Markus Graefen, Fabian Falkenbach, Tobias Maurer, Lars Budäus, Derya Tilki, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Markus Aly, Peter Wiklund, Klaus Brasso, Andreas Røder, Mads H. Poulsen, Martin Schostak, Christiane Görtzen, Anke Renter, Gunhild von Amsberg, Alexander Haese, Hans Heinzer, Georg Salomon, Thomas Steuber, Burkhard Beyer
{"title":"Best Systemic Therapy With or Without Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Men With Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The RAMPP Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Markus Graefen, Fabian Falkenbach, Tobias Maurer, Lars Budäus, Derya Tilki, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Markus Aly, Peter Wiklund, Klaus Brasso, Andreas Røder, Mads H. Poulsen, Martin Schostak, Christiane Görtzen, Anke Renter, Gunhild von Amsberg, Alexander Haese, Hans Heinzer, Georg Salomon, Thomas Steuber, Burkhard Beyer","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.09.4144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background and objective</h3>Our aim was to evaluate the effect of addition of radical prostatectomy (RP) to best systemic therapy (BST) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC).<h3>Methods</h3>This randomised controlled trial included patients with omPC with a low metastatic burden (1–5 bone metastases with/without nodal involvement) on conventional or PET imaging. Patients were randomised to receive either RP with pelvic lymph-node dissection plus BST (RP + BST) or BST alone. The primary endpoint was CSM. Secondary endpoints included clinical progression and overall survival (OS). Study accrual was stopped early because of a change in medical practice. Statistical analyses included cumulative incidence plots, Gray’s test, competing-risks regression, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and log-rank tests.<h3>Key findings and limitations</h3>Between May 2015 and December 2018, 132 patients were randomised. The median age was 67 yr (interquartile range 63–71) and median prostate-specific antigen was 20 ng/ml (interquartile range 10–39). The 5-yr CSM cumulative incidence was 13% for RP + BST and 23% for BST alone (<em>p</em> = 0.037), with a hazard ratio of 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.16–0.98; <em>p</em> = 0.045). The 5-yr cumulative incidence of clinical progression including CSM was 59% for RP + BST and 60% for BST alone. The 5-yr OS rate was 81% for RP + BST and 74% for BST alone. Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III surgery-related complications occurred in nine of 66 (14%) patients in the RP + BST arm. Limitations include early discontinuation of study accrual and the lack of statistical significance for the OS benefit.<h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3>While this trial has substantial limitations, the results support addition of RP as local therapy to BST in omPC.<br/>This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02454543.","PeriodicalId":12223,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.09.4144","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective
Our aim was to evaluate the effect of addition of radical prostatectomy (RP) to best systemic therapy (BST) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC).
Methods
This randomised controlled trial included patients with omPC with a low metastatic burden (1–5 bone metastases with/without nodal involvement) on conventional or PET imaging. Patients were randomised to receive either RP with pelvic lymph-node dissection plus BST (RP + BST) or BST alone. The primary endpoint was CSM. Secondary endpoints included clinical progression and overall survival (OS). Study accrual was stopped early because of a change in medical practice. Statistical analyses included cumulative incidence plots, Gray’s test, competing-risks regression, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and log-rank tests.
Key findings and limitations
Between May 2015 and December 2018, 132 patients were randomised. The median age was 67 yr (interquartile range 63–71) and median prostate-specific antigen was 20 ng/ml (interquartile range 10–39). The 5-yr CSM cumulative incidence was 13% for RP + BST and 23% for BST alone (p = 0.037), with a hazard ratio of 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.16–0.98; p = 0.045). The 5-yr cumulative incidence of clinical progression including CSM was 59% for RP + BST and 60% for BST alone. The 5-yr OS rate was 81% for RP + BST and 74% for BST alone. Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III surgery-related complications occurred in nine of 66 (14%) patients in the RP + BST arm. Limitations include early discontinuation of study accrual and the lack of statistical significance for the OS benefit.
Conclusions and clinical implications
While this trial has substantial limitations, the results support addition of RP as local therapy to BST in omPC. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02454543.
期刊介绍:
European Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of urological issues. Covering topics such as oncology, impotence, infertility, pediatrics, lithiasis and endourology, the journal also highlights recent advances in techniques, instrumentation, surgery, and pediatric urology. This comprehensive approach provides readers with an in-depth guide to international developments in urology.