Auditory-Perceptual Validation of Acoustic Chaos Parameters in Healthy and Dysphonic Voices.

IF 2.2
Owen P Wischhoff, Varsha Gouraram, Taylor J Chumbley, Boquan Liu, Jack J Jiang
{"title":"Auditory-Perceptual Validation of Acoustic Chaos Parameters in Healthy and Dysphonic Voices.","authors":"Owen P Wischhoff, Varsha Gouraram, Taylor J Chumbley, Boquan Liu, Jack J Jiang","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Understanding the correlation between objective acoustic measurements and auditory-perceptual scales is essential for improving voice assessment methods. This study examines the relationship between voice type component profile (VTCP) and weighted index of dysphonia (WID) with the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain Scale (GRBAS), and Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) scales across both healthy and dysphonic voices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Audio samples used in this study were acquired using a publicly available Perceptual Voice Qualities Database. Pearson correlations were conducted between VTCP metrics and GRBAS and CAPE-V scales. To determine the pathological significance of these measures, <i>t</i> tests and logistic regressions were performed to identify key distinguishing variables between healthy and dysphonic subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that VTCP metrics have significant correlations with GRBAS and CAPE-V scales. VTC1 exhibited the strongest correlation with dysphonia grade and severity, reinforcing its role in representing overall voice quality. VTC4 demonstrated high correlations with breathiness, pitch, and overall severity, highlighting its significance in characterizing turbulent vocal signals. WID, representing a composite measure of VTCP parameters, was highly correlated with dysphonia grade and severity, further underscoring its potential clinical utility. Comparisons between CAPE-V and GRBAS revealed strong correlations, suggesting that both scales effectively capture similar perceptual dimensions of dysphonia, despite differences in rating methods. VTC1, VTC4, and WID emerged as the strongest indicators of pathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support VTCP as a valuable objective measure of voice production, closely aligning with established perceptual assessment tools. The results highlight VTCP's potential for clinical implementation in dysphonia evaluation, complementing existing auditory-perceptual scales to enhance diagnostic precision and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Understanding the correlation between objective acoustic measurements and auditory-perceptual scales is essential for improving voice assessment methods. This study examines the relationship between voice type component profile (VTCP) and weighted index of dysphonia (WID) with the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain Scale (GRBAS), and Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) scales across both healthy and dysphonic voices.

Method: Audio samples used in this study were acquired using a publicly available Perceptual Voice Qualities Database. Pearson correlations were conducted between VTCP metrics and GRBAS and CAPE-V scales. To determine the pathological significance of these measures, t tests and logistic regressions were performed to identify key distinguishing variables between healthy and dysphonic subjects.

Results: Results indicated that VTCP metrics have significant correlations with GRBAS and CAPE-V scales. VTC1 exhibited the strongest correlation with dysphonia grade and severity, reinforcing its role in representing overall voice quality. VTC4 demonstrated high correlations with breathiness, pitch, and overall severity, highlighting its significance in characterizing turbulent vocal signals. WID, representing a composite measure of VTCP parameters, was highly correlated with dysphonia grade and severity, further underscoring its potential clinical utility. Comparisons between CAPE-V and GRBAS revealed strong correlations, suggesting that both scales effectively capture similar perceptual dimensions of dysphonia, despite differences in rating methods. VTC1, VTC4, and WID emerged as the strongest indicators of pathology.

Conclusions: These findings support VTCP as a valuable objective measure of voice production, closely aligning with established perceptual assessment tools. The results highlight VTCP's potential for clinical implementation in dysphonia evaluation, complementing existing auditory-perceptual scales to enhance diagnostic precision and reliability.

健全和不正常声音声学混沌参数的听觉-知觉验证。
目的:了解客观声学测量与听觉感知量表之间的相关性对改进语音评估方法至关重要。本研究探讨了声音类型成分谱(VTCP)和发音障碍加权指数(WID)与健康和发音障碍声音的等级、粗糙度、呼吸、乏力、张力量表(GRBAS)和共识听觉感知评价(CAPE-V)量表之间的关系。方法:本研究中使用的音频样本是使用公开可用的感知语音质量数据库获得的。VTCP指标与GRBAS和CAPE-V量表之间存在Pearson相关。为了确定这些指标的病理意义,我们进行了t检验和逻辑回归,以确定健康和发音障碍受试者之间的关键区分变量。结果:结果表明,VTCP指标与GRBAS和CAPE-V量表存在显著相关。VTC1与语音障碍等级和严重程度的相关性最强,加强了它在代表整体语音质量方面的作用。VTC4显示出与呼吸、音调和整体严重程度的高度相关性,突出了它在表征湍流声音信号方面的重要性。WID作为VTCP参数的综合测量指标,与语音障碍的等级和严重程度高度相关,进一步强调了其潜在的临床应用价值。CAPE-V和GRBAS之间的比较显示出很强的相关性,这表明尽管评分方法不同,但两种量表都能有效地捕捉到类似的语音障碍感知维度。VTC1、VTC4和WID是最强的病理指标。结论:这些发现支持VTCP作为一种有价值的客观测量声音产生的方法,与已建立的感知评估工具密切相关。结果强调了VTCP在临床应用于语音障碍评估的潜力,补充了现有的听觉感知量表,以提高诊断的准确性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信