[The challenge of delabeling antibiotic allergy in Colombian children: do parents trust the negative result of the drug provocation test with the implicated antibiotic?]

Ana María Rincón-González, Diana Carolina Galeano-Tamayo, Libia Susana Díez Zuluaga
{"title":"[The challenge of delabeling antibiotic allergy in Colombian children: do parents trust the negative result of the drug provocation test with the implicated antibiotic?]","authors":"Ana María Rincón-González, Diana Carolina Galeano-Tamayo, Libia Susana Díez Zuluaga","doi":"10.29262/ram.v72i3.1465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the factors associated with the use of the antibiotic implicated in an adverse reaction following a negative challenge test in pediatric patients in a clinical allergology service of a health institution in Medellin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational cross-sectional study with analytical intent, in pediatric patients with a history of adverse reaction to an antibiotic, who underwent a provocation test and obtained a negative result. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from medical records and parents or caregivers of patients who met the inclusion criteria were surveyed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2016 and December 2021, 571 antibiotic provocations were performed. Only 19.2% of patients received the implicated antibiotic or antibiotics of the same class after a negative challenge test, without experiencing adverse reactions related to the new use. However, 53% of those who did not receive the antibiotic, despite needing it, mainly because their parents or caregivers continued to report the allergy label. Additionally, 26.9% of parents or caregivers did not recall the negative test result, and 44.2% would refuse future administration of the antibiotic to their children, identifying failure to recall the negative challenge test result as a factor associated with this behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Local strategies (providing individualized forms for parents and healthcare providers) should be designed to explain the meaning of a negative test result, as well as follow-up visits to verify adherence to recommendations, thus increasing the effectiveness of antibiotic allergy delabeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":101421,"journal":{"name":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","volume":"72 3","pages":"11-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v72i3.1465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the factors associated with the use of the antibiotic implicated in an adverse reaction following a negative challenge test in pediatric patients in a clinical allergology service of a health institution in Medellin.

Methods: Observational cross-sectional study with analytical intent, in pediatric patients with a history of adverse reaction to an antibiotic, who underwent a provocation test and obtained a negative result. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from medical records and parents or caregivers of patients who met the inclusion criteria were surveyed.

Results: Between January 2016 and December 2021, 571 antibiotic provocations were performed. Only 19.2% of patients received the implicated antibiotic or antibiotics of the same class after a negative challenge test, without experiencing adverse reactions related to the new use. However, 53% of those who did not receive the antibiotic, despite needing it, mainly because their parents or caregivers continued to report the allergy label. Additionally, 26.9% of parents or caregivers did not recall the negative test result, and 44.2% would refuse future administration of the antibiotic to their children, identifying failure to recall the negative challenge test result as a factor associated with this behavior.

Conclusions: Local strategies (providing individualized forms for parents and healthcare providers) should be designed to explain the meaning of a negative test result, as well as follow-up visits to verify adherence to recommendations, thus increasing the effectiveness of antibiotic allergy delabeling.

哥伦比亚儿童抗生素过敏标签去除的挑战:家长是否相信药物激发试验的阴性结果与相关抗生素?]
目的:探讨麦德林一家卫生机构临床变态反应科服务儿科患者阴性激发试验后不良反应中抗生素使用的相关因素。方法:具有分析目的的观察性横断面研究,对有抗生素不良反应史的儿科患者进行激发试验,结果为阴性。从医疗记录中获得社会人口学和临床数据,并对符合纳入标准的患者的父母或照顾者进行调查。结果:2016年1月至2021年12月,共进行571次抗生素挑衅。只有19.2%的患者在阴性激发试验后接受了相关抗生素或同类抗生素,没有出现与新用途相关的不良反应。然而,53%的人没有接受抗生素治疗,尽管他们需要抗生素,主要是因为他们的父母或照顾者继续报告过敏标签。此外,26.9%的父母或看护人不记得阴性测试结果,44.2%的父母或看护人拒绝未来给孩子使用抗生素,这表明未能回忆起阴性挑战测试结果是与这种行为相关的一个因素。结论:应设计当地策略(为家长和医疗保健提供者提供个性化表格)来解释阴性检测结果的含义,并进行随访以验证是否遵守建议,从而提高抗生素过敏去除标签的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信