PRISM-5 Update: Adaptation and validation of the Spanish Version Interview for Dual Diagnosis Assessment Based on DSM-5 Criteria.

IF 2.8 0 PSYCHIATRY
Claudio Tamarit, Maria Pellicer-Roca, María Alias-Ferrí, Carlos Roncero, Javier Didia-Attas, Francina Fonseca, Julián Andrés Mateus, Joan I MestrePintó, Marta Torrens
{"title":"PRISM-5 Update: Adaptation and validation of the Spanish Version Interview for Dual Diagnosis Assessment Based on DSM-5 Criteria.","authors":"Claudio Tamarit, Maria Pellicer-Roca, María Alias-Ferrí, Carlos Roncero, Javier Didia-Attas, Francina Fonseca, Julián Andrés Mateus, Joan I MestrePintó, Marta Torrens","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing individuals with co-occurring substance use and other mental disorders (SUDs and MDs) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and masking effects. Semi-structured interviews, like the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM), are essential for diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to update and validate the Spanish PRISM-IV to DSM-5 criteria, providing evidence of reliability based on its ability to assess Dual Disorders (DDs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The PRISM-5 was translated and culturally adapted to Spanish to ensure equivalence with the original English version. The interview was computerized using BLAISE© software and pilot-tested. A cross-sectional study with patients recruited from specialized treatment centers in Spain and Argentina compared PRISM-5 diagnoses to those established through the Longitudinal, Expert, All Data (LEAD) method, providing evidence of diagnostic agreement through Cohen's kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>197 patients were recruited (69% male, mean age = 35.6). PRISM-5 showed substantial evidence of diagnostic agreement for most SUDs (k = 0.62-0.77), including alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, heroin, sedative, and amphetamine use disorders, with excellent agreement for past heroin use disorder (k = 0.83). For MDs, substantial agreement was found for major depression, ADHD and psychotic, panic, and personality disorders (k = 0.63-0.73), while moderate agreement was observed for substance-induced and persistent depression (k = 0.59-0.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRISM-5 provided strong evidence of diagnostic reliability in its Spanish version, with substantial agreement across most diagnoses. Compared to the PRISM-IV, it showed similar evidence of reliability, with some notable improvements in areas such as alcohol and cannabis use disorders. These findings underscore the instrument's robustness and value for diagnosing DDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2025.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnosing individuals with co-occurring substance use and other mental disorders (SUDs and MDs) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and masking effects. Semi-structured interviews, like the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM), are essential for diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to update and validate the Spanish PRISM-IV to DSM-5 criteria, providing evidence of reliability based on its ability to assess Dual Disorders (DDs).

Material and methods: The PRISM-5 was translated and culturally adapted to Spanish to ensure equivalence with the original English version. The interview was computerized using BLAISE© software and pilot-tested. A cross-sectional study with patients recruited from specialized treatment centers in Spain and Argentina compared PRISM-5 diagnoses to those established through the Longitudinal, Expert, All Data (LEAD) method, providing evidence of diagnostic agreement through Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results: 197 patients were recruited (69% male, mean age = 35.6). PRISM-5 showed substantial evidence of diagnostic agreement for most SUDs (k = 0.62-0.77), including alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, heroin, sedative, and amphetamine use disorders, with excellent agreement for past heroin use disorder (k = 0.83). For MDs, substantial agreement was found for major depression, ADHD and psychotic, panic, and personality disorders (k = 0.63-0.73), while moderate agreement was observed for substance-induced and persistent depression (k = 0.59-0.60).

Conclusions: PRISM-5 provided strong evidence of diagnostic reliability in its Spanish version, with substantial agreement across most diagnoses. Compared to the PRISM-IV, it showed similar evidence of reliability, with some notable improvements in areas such as alcohol and cannabis use disorders. These findings underscore the instrument's robustness and value for diagnosing DDs.

PRISM-5更新:基于DSM-5标准的双重诊断评估的西班牙语版访谈的改编和验证。
由于症状重叠和掩面效应,诊断同时发生物质使用和其他精神障碍(sud和MDs)的个体具有挑战性。半结构化访谈,如物质与精神障碍精神病学研究访谈(PRISM),对于诊断的准确性至关重要。本研究旨在更新和验证西班牙PRISM-IV到DSM-5标准,提供基于其评估双重障碍(dd)能力的可靠性证据。材料和方法:PRISM-5被翻译和文化适应为西班牙语,以确保与原英文版本等效。访谈采用BLAISE©软件进行计算机化处理,并进行了试点测试。一项从西班牙和阿根廷专业治疗中心招募的患者的横断面研究将PRISM-5诊断与通过纵向,专家,全数据(LEAD)方法建立的诊断进行了比较,通过Cohen的kappa系数提供了诊断一致性的证据。结果:共纳入197例患者(69%为男性,平均年龄35.6岁)。PRISM-5显示了对大多数SUDs的诊断一致性(k = 0.62-0.77),包括酒精、大麻、可卡因、海洛因、镇静剂和安非他明使用障碍,对过去的海洛因使用障碍的诊断一致性非常好(k = 0.83)。对于MDs,重度抑郁、ADHD、精神病性、恐慌和人格障碍的结果基本一致(k = 0.63-0.73),而物质诱导和持续性抑郁的结果中等一致(k = 0.59-0.60)。结论:PRISM-5在其西班牙语版本中提供了强有力的诊断可靠性证据,在大多数诊断中具有实质性的一致性。与PRISM-IV相比,它显示出类似的可靠性证据,在酒精和大麻使用障碍等领域有一些显著改善。这些发现强调了该仪器的稳健性和诊断dd的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信