Ignorance Is Not Bliss: A Systematic Review on the Impact of Ignoring UK Medical Students During Clinical Placements.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.93644
Hozafa Ali, Usama Ali
{"title":"Ignorance Is Not Bliss: A Systematic Review on the Impact of Ignoring UK Medical Students During Clinical Placements.","authors":"Hozafa Ali, Usama Ali","doi":"10.7759/cureus.93644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ignoring medical students on clinical placements is a form of mistreatment that is often overlooked. It is unclear how much research has been done on the topic. We performed the first United Kingdom (UK)-based systematic review on the topic of ignoring medical students. We employed a novel technique that incorporated the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to assist with the review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With the assistance of AI, Boolean search terms were generated to search through five databases in July 2025. Studies that described UK medical students being ignored were included in the final analysis. Inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify common themes between the studies. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative studies and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for mixed-methods studies were utilized to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met the criteria to be included in the final analysis. Four common themes were identified when it came to ignoring medical students: exclusion from learning opportunities, emotional and professional invisibility, reporting barriers, and conflicting priorities between medical students and staff. Most of the CASP and MMAT points were met for the included studies, although studies had a small sample size, were often single-center studies, and had a skew toward students in the Midlands.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This novel AI-assisted systematic review provided vital information on how and why medical students are ignored in the UK. We propose that a vicious cycle exists when it comes to ignoring medical students. Specifically, students feel ignored, which leads to demotivation, ultimately resulting in disengagement. This leads to staff feeling as though students are uninterested, resulting in further ignoring of medical students. There is limited literature on the prevalence of ignoring medical students, and this is something that needs to be explored in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 10","pages":"e93644"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.93644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ignoring medical students on clinical placements is a form of mistreatment that is often overlooked. It is unclear how much research has been done on the topic. We performed the first United Kingdom (UK)-based systematic review on the topic of ignoring medical students. We employed a novel technique that incorporated the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to assist with the review.

Methods: With the assistance of AI, Boolean search terms were generated to search through five databases in July 2025. Studies that described UK medical students being ignored were included in the final analysis. Inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify common themes between the studies. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative studies and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for mixed-methods studies were utilized to assess study quality.

Results: Six studies met the criteria to be included in the final analysis. Four common themes were identified when it came to ignoring medical students: exclusion from learning opportunities, emotional and professional invisibility, reporting barriers, and conflicting priorities between medical students and staff. Most of the CASP and MMAT points were met for the included studies, although studies had a small sample size, were often single-center studies, and had a skew toward students in the Midlands.

Discussion: This novel AI-assisted systematic review provided vital information on how and why medical students are ignored in the UK. We propose that a vicious cycle exists when it comes to ignoring medical students. Specifically, students feel ignored, which leads to demotivation, ultimately resulting in disengagement. This leads to staff feeling as though students are uninterested, resulting in further ignoring of medical students. There is limited literature on the prevalence of ignoring medical students, and this is something that needs to be explored in the future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

无知不是福:在临床实习期间忽视英国医学生的影响的系统回顾。
在临床实习中忽视医学生是一种经常被忽视的虐待形式。目前还不清楚关于这个话题的研究有多少。我们对忽视医学生这一话题进行了首次以英国为基础的系统综述。我们采用了一种新颖的技术,结合了人工智能(AI)的使用来协助审查。方法:在人工智能的帮助下,生成布尔搜索词,在2025年7月的5个数据库中进行搜索。描述英国医学生被忽视的研究被纳入最终分析。进行归纳主题分析以确定研究之间的共同主题。定性研究的关键评估技能计划(CASP)检查表和混合方法研究的混合方法评估工具(MMAT)用于评估研究质量。结果:6项研究符合纳入最终分析的标准。当谈到忽视医学生时,确定了四个常见的主题:被排除在学习机会之外,情感和专业上的隐形,报告障碍,以及医学生和工作人员之间的优先事项冲突。虽然纳入的研究样本量较小,通常是单中心研究,并且对中部地区的学生有偏倚,但大多数CASP和MMAT点都得到了满足。讨论:这篇新颖的人工智能辅助系统综述提供了重要的信息,说明了医学生在英国是如何以及为什么被忽视的。我们认为忽视医学生是一种恶性循环。具体来说,学生感到被忽视,这会导致失去动力,最终导致脱离课堂。这导致教职员工感觉学生们似乎不感兴趣,从而导致对医学生的进一步忽视。关于忽视医学生的普遍程度的文献有限,这是未来需要探索的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信