Longitudinal Cognitive Recovery in Survivors of Critical Illness: Impact of Sepsis and Benzodiazepine Exposure.

Ruhi Sahu, Ruth-Ann Brown, Anthony S Bonavia
{"title":"Longitudinal Cognitive Recovery in Survivors of Critical Illness: Impact of Sepsis and Benzodiazepine Exposure.","authors":"Ruhi Sahu, Ruth-Ann Brown, Anthony S Bonavia","doi":"10.1101/2025.09.23.25336354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-critical illness cognitive dysfunction (PCICD) is a common and debilitating condition affecting survivors of critical illness. While sepsis has been implicated in poor cognitive outcomes, its independent contribution remains unclear due to multiple associated confounders in critical illness. This study aimed to characterize cognitive recovery trajectories over 12 months post-intensive care unit (ICU) and to evaluate the influence of sepsis and benzodiazepine exposure on cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, prospective cohort study, adult ICU survivors were assessed at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-discharge using the telephone-administered Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Scores were standardized into <i>z-</i> scores for comparability. Mixed-effects models assessed changes over time and the effects of clinical covariates, including sepsis status and benzodiazepine exposure. Additionally, we investigated whether any one specific cognitive domain was disproportionally impaired by critical illness over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 197 eligible patients during the enrollment period, 77 (39%) completed at least one cognitive assessment. Standardized cognitive scores significantly improved over time, with the greatest gains observed within 6 months: +0.40 SD at 3 months (p = 0.041), +0.54 SD at 6 months (p = 0.016), and +0.49 SD at 12 months (p = 0.033) compared to scores at the time of acute illness. Sepsis status had no significant effect on recovery trajectory. No single cognitive domain was disproportionately affected by critical illness; instead, changes were observed in the overall score over time. Benzodiazepine exposure showed complex associations: longer duration (-0.24 SD/day, p = 0.008) and higher daily dose (-0.02 SD/unit, p = 0.006) were linked to worse cognition, while total cumulative dose was paradoxically associated with better scores (+0.03 SD/unit, p < 0.001), possibly reflecting confounding by indication or survival bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICU survivors experience gradual cognitive recovery over the first year, primarily within 6 months. Sepsis does not independently affect this trajectory. Benzodiazepine exposure, especially prolonged or high daily dosing, emerges as a modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment, consistent with prior investigations of PCICD. These findings highlight the importance of sedation strategies and structured cognitive follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.25336354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-critical illness cognitive dysfunction (PCICD) is a common and debilitating condition affecting survivors of critical illness. While sepsis has been implicated in poor cognitive outcomes, its independent contribution remains unclear due to multiple associated confounders in critical illness. This study aimed to characterize cognitive recovery trajectories over 12 months post-intensive care unit (ICU) and to evaluate the influence of sepsis and benzodiazepine exposure on cognitive outcomes.

Methods: In this single-center, prospective cohort study, adult ICU survivors were assessed at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-discharge using the telephone-administered Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Scores were standardized into z- scores for comparability. Mixed-effects models assessed changes over time and the effects of clinical covariates, including sepsis status and benzodiazepine exposure. Additionally, we investigated whether any one specific cognitive domain was disproportionally impaired by critical illness over time.

Results: Of 197 eligible patients during the enrollment period, 77 (39%) completed at least one cognitive assessment. Standardized cognitive scores significantly improved over time, with the greatest gains observed within 6 months: +0.40 SD at 3 months (p = 0.041), +0.54 SD at 6 months (p = 0.016), and +0.49 SD at 12 months (p = 0.033) compared to scores at the time of acute illness. Sepsis status had no significant effect on recovery trajectory. No single cognitive domain was disproportionately affected by critical illness; instead, changes were observed in the overall score over time. Benzodiazepine exposure showed complex associations: longer duration (-0.24 SD/day, p = 0.008) and higher daily dose (-0.02 SD/unit, p = 0.006) were linked to worse cognition, while total cumulative dose was paradoxically associated with better scores (+0.03 SD/unit, p < 0.001), possibly reflecting confounding by indication or survival bias.

Conclusions: ICU survivors experience gradual cognitive recovery over the first year, primarily within 6 months. Sepsis does not independently affect this trajectory. Benzodiazepine exposure, especially prolonged or high daily dosing, emerges as a modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment, consistent with prior investigations of PCICD. These findings highlight the importance of sedation strategies and structured cognitive follow-up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重症幸存者的纵向认知恢复:败血症和苯二氮卓类药物暴露的影响。
背景:危重症后认知功能障碍(PCICD)是影响危重症幸存者的一种常见的衰弱性疾病。虽然脓毒症与认知预后不良有关,但由于危重疾病中存在多种相关混杂因素,其独立贡献尚不清楚。本研究旨在描述重症监护病房(ICU)后12个月的认知恢复轨迹,并评估败血症和苯二氮卓类药物暴露对认知结果的影响。方法:在这项单中心前瞻性队列研究中,使用电话管理的简易精神状态检查(MMSE)或蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)对ICU成年幸存者在出院后30天、3个月、6个月和12个月进行评估。为了便于比较,分数被标准化为z-分数。混合效应模型评估了随时间的变化和临床协变量的影响,包括败血症状态和苯二氮卓类药物暴露。此外,我们还调查了是否有任何一个特定的认知领域随着时间的推移而受到严重疾病的不成比例的损害。结果:在197名符合条件的患者中,77名(39%)完成了至少一项认知评估。随着时间的推移,标准化认知评分显著提高,6个月内观察到的最大收益:与急性疾病时的评分相比,3个月时+0.40 SD (p = 0.041), 6个月时+0.54 SD (p = 0.016), 12个月时+0.49 SD (p = 0.033)。脓毒症状态对恢复轨迹无显著影响。没有一个单一的认知领域不成比例地受到危重疾病的影响;相反,随着时间的推移,总体得分发生了变化。苯二氮卓类药物暴露显示出复杂的关联:较长的持续时间(-0.24 SD/天,p = 0.008)和较高的日剂量(-0.02 SD/单位,p = 0.006)与较差的认知有关,而总累积剂量与较好的评分矛盾地相关(+0.03 SD/单位,p < 0.001),可能反映了适应症或生存偏倚的混淆。结论:ICU幸存者在第一年的认知能力逐渐恢复,主要是在6个月内。脓毒症并不单独影响这一轨迹。苯二氮卓类药物暴露,特别是长时间或每日高剂量暴露,是认知障碍的可改变危险因素,这与先前对PCICD的调查一致。这些发现强调了镇静策略和有组织的认知随访的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信