Mapping genetic effects on splicing in ten thousand post-mortem brain samples reveals novel mediators of neurological disease risk.

Aline Réal, B P Kailash, Winston H Cuddleston, Benjamin Z Muller, Beomjin Jang, Alex Tokolyi, Hong-Hee Won, Jack Humphrey, Towfique Raj, David A Knowles
{"title":"Mapping genetic effects on splicing in ten thousand post-mortem brain samples reveals novel mediators of neurological disease risk.","authors":"Aline Réal, B P Kailash, Winston H Cuddleston, Benjamin Z Muller, Beomjin Jang, Alex Tokolyi, Hong-Hee Won, Jack Humphrey, Towfique Raj, David A Knowles","doi":"10.1101/2025.09.25.25336663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alternative splicing shapes isoform diversity and gene dosage, but how genetic variation impacts splicing in brain disease is still not fully characterized. We assembled BigBrain, a multi-ancestry resource of 10,725 bulk RNA-seq profiles with matched genotypes from 4,656 individuals across 43 tissue-cohort pairs and mapped 68,358 <i>cis</i> -sQTLs affecting 10,966 genes using mixed-model meta-analysis. Using SuSiE, we were able to finemap over half of these sQTLs into 95% credible sets, frequently to a single variant near splice sites. We further annotated variants predicted to alter dosage through frameshifts or nonsense-mediated decay or disrupt protein domains. Colocalization with seven neurodegenerative and psychiatric GWAS highlighted 97 loci where alternative splicing appears to mediate genetic risk. Among sQTL-eQTL pairs with colocalization probability ≥ 0.8 (posterior probability of a shared causal variant), half shared credible-set variants, showing that splicing can complement or act independently of expression. Mechanistic examples include <i>CAMLG</i> , <i>ZDHHC2</i> , and <i>CLU</i> .</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.25.25336663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative splicing shapes isoform diversity and gene dosage, but how genetic variation impacts splicing in brain disease is still not fully characterized. We assembled BigBrain, a multi-ancestry resource of 10,725 bulk RNA-seq profiles with matched genotypes from 4,656 individuals across 43 tissue-cohort pairs and mapped 68,358 cis -sQTLs affecting 10,966 genes using mixed-model meta-analysis. Using SuSiE, we were able to finemap over half of these sQTLs into 95% credible sets, frequently to a single variant near splice sites. We further annotated variants predicted to alter dosage through frameshifts or nonsense-mediated decay or disrupt protein domains. Colocalization with seven neurodegenerative and psychiatric GWAS highlighted 97 loci where alternative splicing appears to mediate genetic risk. Among sQTL-eQTL pairs with colocalization probability ≥ 0.8 (posterior probability of a shared causal variant), half shared credible-set variants, showing that splicing can complement or act independently of expression. Mechanistic examples include CAMLG , ZDHHC2 , and CLU .

在10,000个死后大脑样本中绘制剪接的遗传效应揭示了神经系统疾病风险的新介质。
选择性剪接影响同种异构体多样性和基因剂量,但遗传变异如何影响脑部疾病剪接仍未完全表征。我们组装了BigBrain,这是一个多祖先资源,包含来自43个组织队列对的4,656个个体的10,725个大量RNA-seq图谱,具有匹配的基因型,并使用混合模型荟萃分析绘制了68,358个cis - sqtl,影响10,966个基因。使用SuSiE,我们能够将超过一半的sqtl精细映射到95%可信的集合中,通常是剪接位点附近的单个变体。我们进一步注释了预测通过帧移或无义介导的衰变或破坏蛋白质结构域来改变剂量的变异。7个神经退行性和精神GWAS的共定位突出了97个位点,其中选择性剪接似乎介导遗传风险。在共定位概率≥0.8(共享因果变异后验概率)的sQTL-eQTL对中,有一半的sQTL-eQTL对共享可信集变异,说明剪接可以与表达互补或独立作用。机制上的例子包括CAMLG、ZDHHC2和CLU。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信