[Diosmin-hesperidin-induced DRESS syndrome: immune reactivation by herpesvirus].

Nataly Flores-García, Carlos Correa-Serrano, Juan Carlos Cardenas-Favela, Diana Cadenas-García, Rosalaura Villarreal-González
{"title":"[Diosmin-hesperidin-induced DRESS syndrome: immune reactivation by herpesvirus].","authors":"Nataly Flores-García, Carlos Correa-Serrano, Juan Carlos Cardenas-Favela, Diana Cadenas-García, Rosalaura Villarreal-González","doi":"10.29262/ram.v72i3.1502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction. The incidence is 1-1,000,000 with a mortality rate of 3.8-10%, and it is a disease associated with reactivation of the herpes simplex virus.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 34-year-old woman with atopy and venous insufficiency presented with pruritic hives on her face and arms, which progressed to a morbilliform rash, facial edema, fever, lymphadenopathy, and scaling. A complete blood count showed no abnormalities: AST: 837 U/L, ALT: 11352 U/L. Due to the suspicion of DRESS syndrome, treatment with corticosteroids was initiated and a biopsy was obtained. Upon questioning, the patient reported having taken diosmin-hesperidin and undergone systemic sunscreen (Heliocare360°®) 21 days prior to the onset of the rash. Histopathological examination revealed atrophic epidermis, vacuolar degeneration, and inflammatory infiltrate. Systemic corticosteroids were administered for three weeks, with a satisfactory response. Two months later, the patient experienced reactivation of the dermatosis and hypertransaminasemia; the autoantibody panel and serology were positive for IgM for herpes simplex virus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case underscores the need to consider severe hypersensitivity reactions, even with commonly used and apparently low-risk drugs. The importance of a comprehensive approach, including identification of the suspected medication, exclusion of differential diagnoses, prolonged clinical follow-up, and surveillance for possible viral reactivation, is emphasized.</p>","PeriodicalId":101421,"journal":{"name":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","volume":"72 3","pages":"57-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v72i3.1502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction. The incidence is 1-1,000,000 with a mortality rate of 3.8-10%, and it is a disease associated with reactivation of the herpes simplex virus.

Case report: A 34-year-old woman with atopy and venous insufficiency presented with pruritic hives on her face and arms, which progressed to a morbilliform rash, facial edema, fever, lymphadenopathy, and scaling. A complete blood count showed no abnormalities: AST: 837 U/L, ALT: 11352 U/L. Due to the suspicion of DRESS syndrome, treatment with corticosteroids was initiated and a biopsy was obtained. Upon questioning, the patient reported having taken diosmin-hesperidin and undergone systemic sunscreen (Heliocare360°®) 21 days prior to the onset of the rash. Histopathological examination revealed atrophic epidermis, vacuolar degeneration, and inflammatory infiltrate. Systemic corticosteroids were administered for three weeks, with a satisfactory response. Two months later, the patient experienced reactivation of the dermatosis and hypertransaminasemia; the autoantibody panel and serology were positive for IgM for herpes simplex virus.

Conclusion: This case underscores the need to consider severe hypersensitivity reactions, even with commonly used and apparently low-risk drugs. The importance of a comprehensive approach, including identification of the suspected medication, exclusion of differential diagnoses, prolonged clinical follow-up, and surveillance for possible viral reactivation, is emphasized.

[薯蓣-橙皮苷诱导的DRESS综合征:疱疹病毒的免疫再激活]。
背景:药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状(DRESS)是一种严重的皮肤不良反应。发病率为100 - 100万,死亡率为3.8% -10%,是一种与单纯疱疹病毒再活化有关的疾病。病例报告:一名34岁女性,特应性和静脉功能不全,面部和手臂出现瘙痒性荨麻疹,并发展为麻疹样皮疹、面部水肿、发烧、淋巴结病和脱屑。全血细胞计数未见异常:AST: 837 U/L, ALT: 11352 U/L。由于怀疑为DRESS综合征,开始使用皮质类固醇治疗并进行活检。经询问,患者报告在皮疹发作前21天服用了薯蓣皂苷-橙皮苷并进行了全身防晒(Heliocare360°®)。组织病理学检查显示表皮萎缩,空泡变性,炎症浸润。全身性皮质类固醇治疗三周,疗效满意。2个月后,患者再次出现皮肤病和高转氨酶血症;自身抗体和血清学均为单纯疱疹病毒IgM阳性。结论:本病例强调需要考虑严重的超敏反应,即使使用常用和明显低风险的药物。强调综合方法的重要性,包括确定可疑药物,排除鉴别诊断,延长临床随访时间,并监测可能的病毒再激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信