Predicting repetitive negative thinking in daily life: Insights from the brain-based graph-theoretical predictive modeling.

IF 4.8
Martino Schettino, Rotem Dan, Chiara Parrillo, Federico Giove, Antonio Napolitano, Cristina Ottaviani, Diego A Pizzagalli
{"title":"Predicting repetitive negative thinking in daily life: Insights from the brain-based graph-theoretical predictive modeling.","authors":"Martino Schettino, Rotem Dan, Chiara Parrillo, Federico Giove, Antonio Napolitano, Cristina Ottaviani, Diego A Pizzagalli","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abnormalities in the functional connectivity of large-scale brain networks, including the default mode (DMN), salience (SN), fronto-parietal (FPN), and limbic networks, have been implicated in repetitive negative thinking (RNT), a construct characterized by persistent and intrusive thoughts. However, the potential of these large-scale network abnormalities for predicting RNT in daily life remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We leveraged the brain-based graph-theoretical predictive modeling (GPM) to predict daily-life RNT in 54 individuals. Functional MRI data were acquired during: (i) resting-state and (ii) an RNT-induced state. RNT severity and its momentary fluctuations were assessed using ecological momentary assessments (EMA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GPM identified key functional organizational properties of the DMN, FPN, and limbic networks that differentially predicted the severity and fluctuations of RNT and its specific clinical features (intrusiveness, repetitiveness, RNT-related anxiety). Specifically, the centrality of the medial prefrontal cortex (DMN) predicted EMA fluctuations of intrusiveness and severity of anxiety. Conversely, the strength and centrality of the orbitofrontal cortex (part of the limbic network) predicted EMA fluctuations of repetitiveness, and the segregation of the temporal pole (limbic network) predicted overall severity of RNT. Last, fluctuations in total RNT were predicted from the strength of the orbitofrontal cortex (limbic network) and segregation of the posterior mid-cingulate cortex (FPN). Notably, RNT was better predicted from daily-life prospective assessments than from lab-assessed clinical questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the utility of the GPM for predicting the emergence of daily-life RNT and suggest specific network-level attributes (e.g., centrality, segregation) underlying RNT and its clinical features.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.09.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Abnormalities in the functional connectivity of large-scale brain networks, including the default mode (DMN), salience (SN), fronto-parietal (FPN), and limbic networks, have been implicated in repetitive negative thinking (RNT), a construct characterized by persistent and intrusive thoughts. However, the potential of these large-scale network abnormalities for predicting RNT in daily life remains underexplored.

Methods: We leveraged the brain-based graph-theoretical predictive modeling (GPM) to predict daily-life RNT in 54 individuals. Functional MRI data were acquired during: (i) resting-state and (ii) an RNT-induced state. RNT severity and its momentary fluctuations were assessed using ecological momentary assessments (EMA).

Results: The GPM identified key functional organizational properties of the DMN, FPN, and limbic networks that differentially predicted the severity and fluctuations of RNT and its specific clinical features (intrusiveness, repetitiveness, RNT-related anxiety). Specifically, the centrality of the medial prefrontal cortex (DMN) predicted EMA fluctuations of intrusiveness and severity of anxiety. Conversely, the strength and centrality of the orbitofrontal cortex (part of the limbic network) predicted EMA fluctuations of repetitiveness, and the segregation of the temporal pole (limbic network) predicted overall severity of RNT. Last, fluctuations in total RNT were predicted from the strength of the orbitofrontal cortex (limbic network) and segregation of the posterior mid-cingulate cortex (FPN). Notably, RNT was better predicted from daily-life prospective assessments than from lab-assessed clinical questionnaires.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the utility of the GPM for predicting the emergence of daily-life RNT and suggest specific network-level attributes (e.g., centrality, segregation) underlying RNT and its clinical features.

预测日常生活中重复的消极思维:来自基于大脑的图形理论预测模型的见解。
背景:包括默认模式(DMN)、显著性(SN)、额顶叶(FPN)和边缘网络在内的大型大脑网络的功能连通性异常与重复性消极思维(RNT)有关,RNT是一种以持续和侵入性思维为特征的结构。然而,这些大规模网络异常在日常生活中预测RNT的潜力仍未得到充分探索。方法:我们利用基于大脑的图理论预测模型(GPM)来预测54名个体的日常生活RNT。在(i)静息状态和(ii) rnt诱导状态下获得功能性MRI数据。RNT严重程度及其瞬时波动采用生态瞬时评估(EMA)进行评估。结果:GPM确定了DMN、FPN和边缘网络的关键功能组织特性,这些特性差异地预测了RNT的严重程度和波动及其特定的临床特征(侵入性、重复性、RNT相关焦虑)。具体来说,内侧前额叶皮层(DMN)的中心性预测了侵入性和焦虑严重程度的EMA波动。相反,眶额皮质(边缘网络的一部分)的强度和中心性预测重复性的EMA波动,而颞极(边缘网络)的分离预测RNT的整体严重程度。最后,通过眶额皮质(边缘网络)的强度和后中扣带皮层(FPN)的分离来预测总RNT的波动。值得注意的是,日常生活前瞻性评估比实验室评估的临床问卷更能预测RNT。结论:这些发现强调了GPM在预测日常生活RNT出现方面的效用,并提示了RNT及其临床特征背后的特定网络级属性(如中心性、隔离性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信