Effectiveness of digital pain management for older adults with musculoskeletal pain: systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2025.1657014
Anabela G Silva, Ana J Santos, Rosa Andias, Nelson P Rocha
{"title":"Effectiveness of digital pain management for older adults with musculoskeletal pain: systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Anabela G Silva, Ana J Santos, Rosa Andias, Nelson P Rocha","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1657014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Musculoskeletal pain is highly prevalent among older adults and a leading cause of disability. Digital health promises to deliver timely and quality care, but existing reviews fail to be specific for older adults, focus on a single type of technology or a single body site, and do not provide an integrated overview of the effectiveness of current digital interventions. This systematic review with meta-analysis (Prospero ID: CRD42024549668) aimed to assess the effectiveness of digital interventions for pain management in reducing pain intensity and self-reported disability in older adults with musculoskeletal pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Academic Search Complete from inception to April 2025; extracted data on participants, interventions, and primary (pain intensity and self-reported disability) and secondary outcomes (performance, pain-related psychological variables, and adverse events).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six RCTs were included (<i>n</i> = 4,041). Compared to other active interventions, older adults who received digital pain management reported lower pain intensity (SMD = -0.23, 95%CI = -0.37;-0.09) and lower self-reported disability (SMD = -0.22, 95%CI = -0.39;-0.04) at post-intervention. The effect was maintained at 6 months for pain intensity (SMD = -0.20; 95%CI = -0.38;-0.03), but not for disability (SMD = 0.13, 95%CI = -0.38;0.63). The certainty of evidence was low or very low, and heterogeneity was low to substantial. Most studies included domains judged as high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of digital interventions on pain intensity and disability. They may decrease pain intensity and disability similarly to other interventions, but more research is needed to investigate the effect of digital interventions and identify key aspects that maximise the intervention.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024549668, PROSPERO CRD42024549668.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1657014"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2025.1657014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal pain is highly prevalent among older adults and a leading cause of disability. Digital health promises to deliver timely and quality care, but existing reviews fail to be specific for older adults, focus on a single type of technology or a single body site, and do not provide an integrated overview of the effectiveness of current digital interventions. This systematic review with meta-analysis (Prospero ID: CRD42024549668) aimed to assess the effectiveness of digital interventions for pain management in reducing pain intensity and self-reported disability in older adults with musculoskeletal pain.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Academic Search Complete from inception to April 2025; extracted data on participants, interventions, and primary (pain intensity and self-reported disability) and secondary outcomes (performance, pain-related psychological variables, and adverse events).

Results: Thirty-six RCTs were included (n = 4,041). Compared to other active interventions, older adults who received digital pain management reported lower pain intensity (SMD = -0.23, 95%CI = -0.37;-0.09) and lower self-reported disability (SMD = -0.22, 95%CI = -0.39;-0.04) at post-intervention. The effect was maintained at 6 months for pain intensity (SMD = -0.20; 95%CI = -0.38;-0.03), but not for disability (SMD = 0.13, 95%CI = -0.38;0.63). The certainty of evidence was low or very low, and heterogeneity was low to substantial. Most studies included domains judged as high risk of bias.

Discussion: The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of digital interventions on pain intensity and disability. They may decrease pain intensity and disability similarly to other interventions, but more research is needed to investigate the effect of digital interventions and identify key aspects that maximise the intervention.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024549668, PROSPERO CRD42024549668.

数字疼痛管理对老年人肌肉骨骼疼痛的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
肌肉骨骼疼痛在老年人中非常普遍,是导致残疾的主要原因。数字健康承诺提供及时和高质量的护理,但现有的审查未能针对老年人,侧重于单一类型的技术或单一的身体地点,并且没有对当前数字干预措施的有效性提供综合概述。本系统综述采用荟萃分析(Prospero ID: CRD42024549668),旨在评估数字干预在减轻老年肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛强度和自我报告残疾方面的有效性。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Academic Search Complete,检索时间从成立到2025年4月;提取有关参与者、干预措施、主要(疼痛强度和自我报告的残疾)和次要结局(表现、疼痛相关心理变量和不良事件)的数据。结果:共纳入36项rct (n = 4041)。与其他积极干预措施相比,接受数字疼痛管理的老年人在干预后报告的疼痛强度较低(SMD = -0.23, 95%CI = -0.37;-0.09),自我报告的残疾程度较低(SMD = -0.22, 95%CI = -0.39;-0.04)。对于疼痛强度(SMD = -0.20; 95%CI = -0.38;-0.03),效果在6个月时保持,但对于残疾(SMD = 0.13, 95%CI = -0.38;0.63)则没有效果。证据的确定性低或非常低,异质性从低到大。大多数研究包括被判定为高偏倚风险的领域。讨论:关于数字干预对疼痛强度和残疾的影响,证据非常不确定。与其他干预措施类似,它们可能会减少疼痛强度和残疾,但需要更多的研究来调查数字干预措施的效果,并确定最大限度地发挥干预作用的关键方面。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024549668, PROSPERO CRD42024549668。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信