Impact of continuing professional development (CPD) on patient outcomes: a systematic scoping review.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Salwa Ali, Ahsan Sethi, Abderrezzaq Soltani, Zachariah Nazar
{"title":"Impact of continuing professional development (CPD) on patient outcomes: a systematic scoping review.","authors":"Salwa Ali, Ahsan Sethi, Abderrezzaq Soltani, Zachariah Nazar","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07883-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is vital for maintaining healthcare professionals' competence in providing quality patient care. However, evidence linking CPD directly to patient outcomes remains limited and methodologically diverse, hindering generalizable conclusions. This scoping review synthesises available evidence on the impact of CPD participation on patient outcomes, identifies patterns in intervention design and outcome measures, and explores key implementation and contextual factors that influence CPD effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In September 2024 PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for studies that assessed the impact of CPD interventions on patient health outcomes in healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened the articles for eligibility and charted the data. Findings were synthesized using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative summary and qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1562 records screened, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the articles (n = 16) originated from high-income countries. Multi-component CPD interventions, particularly those with sustained support and practical skills development, demonstrated greater effectiveness than standalone educational activities. Positive patient outcomes were reported in 14 studies, including reduced hypoglycemic events, and shorter ICU stays. The most impactful interventions were those implemented with organizational support, clear protocols, and ongoing reinforcement. Nevertheless, the evidence base was constrained by variations in outcome measures (e.g., mortality rates, complication rates, functional scores), and short follow-up durations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite CPD's prominence in healthcare systems, only a few studies directly evaluate it to improved patient outcomes. This review highlights that CPD programs incorporating practical skill development, protocol-based implementation, organizational support, and ongoing reinforcement can enhance patient care. Future research should adopt rigorous methodologies, consistent outcome measures, and long-term follow-up to better evaluate CPD's effectiveness. Additionally, CPD providers should prioritize integrated approaches between theoretical knowledge, applied practice, and continuous support mechanisms to maximize clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"1284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07883-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is vital for maintaining healthcare professionals' competence in providing quality patient care. However, evidence linking CPD directly to patient outcomes remains limited and methodologically diverse, hindering generalizable conclusions. This scoping review synthesises available evidence on the impact of CPD participation on patient outcomes, identifies patterns in intervention design and outcome measures, and explores key implementation and contextual factors that influence CPD effectiveness.

Methods: In September 2024 PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for studies that assessed the impact of CPD interventions on patient health outcomes in healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened the articles for eligibility and charted the data. Findings were synthesized using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative summary and qualitative content analysis.

Results: Of 1562 records screened, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the articles (n = 16) originated from high-income countries. Multi-component CPD interventions, particularly those with sustained support and practical skills development, demonstrated greater effectiveness than standalone educational activities. Positive patient outcomes were reported in 14 studies, including reduced hypoglycemic events, and shorter ICU stays. The most impactful interventions were those implemented with organizational support, clear protocols, and ongoing reinforcement. Nevertheless, the evidence base was constrained by variations in outcome measures (e.g., mortality rates, complication rates, functional scores), and short follow-up durations.

Conclusions: Despite CPD's prominence in healthcare systems, only a few studies directly evaluate it to improved patient outcomes. This review highlights that CPD programs incorporating practical skill development, protocol-based implementation, organizational support, and ongoing reinforcement can enhance patient care. Future research should adopt rigorous methodologies, consistent outcome measures, and long-term follow-up to better evaluate CPD's effectiveness. Additionally, CPD providers should prioritize integrated approaches between theoretical knowledge, applied practice, and continuous support mechanisms to maximize clinical impact.

Abstract Image

持续专业发展(CPD)对患者预后的影响:一项系统的范围审查。
背景:持续专业发展(CPD)对于维持医疗保健专业人员提供高质量患者护理的能力至关重要。然而,将CPD与患者预后直接联系起来的证据仍然有限,而且方法多样,阻碍了结论的推广。本综述综合了CPD参与对患者预后影响的现有证据,确定了干预设计和结果测量的模式,并探讨了影响CPD有效性的关键实施和背景因素。方法:2024年9月,PubMed、Embase、CINAHL和ERIC检索了评估CPD干预对医疗机构患者健康结果影响的研究。两位审稿人独立筛选文章的合格性,并绘制数据图表。研究结果采用定量总结和定性内容分析相结合的混合方法进行综合。结果:在筛选的1562份记录中,有17项研究符合纳入标准。大多数文章(n = 16)来自高收入国家。多部分持续专业发展干预措施,特别是那些持续支持和实用技能发展的干预措施,比单独的教育活动更有效。14项研究报告了积极的患者结果,包括降低低血糖事件和缩短ICU住院时间。最有效的干预措施是那些有组织支持、明确的方案和持续加强的措施。然而,证据基础受到结果测量(如死亡率、并发症发生率、功能评分)的变化和随访时间短的限制。结论:尽管CPD在医疗保健系统中占有重要地位,但只有少数研究直接评估了它对改善患者预后的作用。本综述强调CPD项目结合了实践技能发展、基于协议的实施、组织支持和持续的强化,可以提高患者的护理水平。未来的研究应采用严谨的方法、一致的结果测量和长期随访来更好地评估CPD的有效性。此外,CPD提供者应优先考虑理论知识、应用实践和持续支持机制之间的综合方法,以最大限度地提高临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信