Voluntary Group Programs For Men Who Use Violence: A Scoping Review.

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Corina Modderman, Stacey Bracksley-O'Grady, Jaime Chubb, Kasi Burge, Bonn Gillies, Kirsty Forsdike, Leesa Hooker
{"title":"Voluntary Group Programs For Men Who Use Violence: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Corina Modderman, Stacey Bracksley-O'Grady, Jaime Chubb, Kasi Burge, Bonn Gillies, Kirsty Forsdike, Leesa Hooker","doi":"10.1177/15248380251375489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intimate partner violence remains a pervasive issue globally, affecting individuals, families, and communities at alarming rates. While interventions have traditionally focused on supporting victims and survivors, including court-mandated behavioral change programs for men who perpetrate violence, there is a growing need to explore voluntary programs for men who use violence. This reflects a broader shift toward prevention, education, and support rather than a sole focus on reactive measures. By engaging men before violence escalates or becomes more frequent, these programs may offer a valuable opportunity to reduce harm, promote healthier behaviors, and ultimately create safer communities. This review assesses the current state of knowledge and identifies gaps in voluntary group programs for men who use violence. A scoping review was undertaken to better understand the current state of knowledge in the scholarly literature on voluntary programs for men who use violence. Thirteen studies meeting the eligibility criteria (published from 2014 to June 2025) were included for analysis after systemically sourcing articles from four databases and screening them using transparent inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies were selected based on their relevance to voluntary, non-court-mandated interventions. The findings demonstrate significant gaps in the literature, particularly regarding the ability of voluntary programs to foster sustained and meaningful behavior change. While some studies reported positive short-term outcomes, such as increased self-awareness and improved relationship dynamics, the long-term impact of these programs remains uncertain. In addition, challenges in participant engagement and retention were frequently reported, further complicating the evaluation of program effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"15248380251375489"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251375489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intimate partner violence remains a pervasive issue globally, affecting individuals, families, and communities at alarming rates. While interventions have traditionally focused on supporting victims and survivors, including court-mandated behavioral change programs for men who perpetrate violence, there is a growing need to explore voluntary programs for men who use violence. This reflects a broader shift toward prevention, education, and support rather than a sole focus on reactive measures. By engaging men before violence escalates or becomes more frequent, these programs may offer a valuable opportunity to reduce harm, promote healthier behaviors, and ultimately create safer communities. This review assesses the current state of knowledge and identifies gaps in voluntary group programs for men who use violence. A scoping review was undertaken to better understand the current state of knowledge in the scholarly literature on voluntary programs for men who use violence. Thirteen studies meeting the eligibility criteria (published from 2014 to June 2025) were included for analysis after systemically sourcing articles from four databases and screening them using transparent inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies were selected based on their relevance to voluntary, non-court-mandated interventions. The findings demonstrate significant gaps in the literature, particularly regarding the ability of voluntary programs to foster sustained and meaningful behavior change. While some studies reported positive short-term outcomes, such as increased self-awareness and improved relationship dynamics, the long-term impact of these programs remains uncertain. In addition, challenges in participant engagement and retention were frequently reported, further complicating the evaluation of program effectiveness.

针对使用暴力的男性的自愿团体项目:范围审查。
亲密伴侣暴力仍然是全球普遍存在的问题,以惊人的速度影响着个人、家庭和社区。虽然干预措施传统上侧重于支持受害者和幸存者,包括法院强制实施的针对施暴者的行为改变项目,但越来越需要探索针对施暴者的自愿项目。这反映了向预防、教育和支持的更广泛转变,而不是只注重被动措施。通过在暴力升级或变得更频繁之前让男性参与进来,这些项目可能提供一个宝贵的机会来减少伤害,促进更健康的行为,并最终创造更安全的社区。本综述评估了目前的知识状况,并确定了针对使用暴力的男性的自愿团体项目中的差距。进行了范围审查,以便更好地了解关于使用暴力的男子自愿方案的学术文献的知识现状。在系统地从四个数据库中检索文章并使用透明的纳入和排除标准进行筛选后,纳入了13项符合资格标准的研究(发表于2014年至2025年6月)进行分析。选择这些研究的依据是它们与自愿、非法院强制干预的相关性。研究结果显示了文献中的重大空白,特别是关于自愿项目促进持续和有意义的行为改变的能力。虽然一些研究报告了积极的短期结果,如提高自我意识和改善关系动态,但这些项目的长期影响仍不确定。此外,经常报告参与者参与和保留方面的挑战,这进一步使项目有效性的评估复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信