Utilization of animal experiment-based simulation surgery platforms in the education of endoscopic thyroidectomy: a preliminary study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Haichao Yan, Ruiying Zhu, Ning Yue, Zhenyi Han, Xiaobo Yu, Cheerly Tanu, Ping Wang, Xing Yu
{"title":"Utilization of animal experiment-based simulation surgery platforms in the education of endoscopic thyroidectomy: a preliminary study.","authors":"Haichao Yan, Ruiying Zhu, Ning Yue, Zhenyi Han, Xiaobo Yu, Cheerly Tanu, Ping Wang, Xing Yu","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07935-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic thyroidectomy, due to its superior cosmetic outcomes and improved postoperative quality of life, is increasingly in demand, especially among young female patients. However, performing the procedure while protecting crucial structures such as parathyroid glands and laryngeal nerves remains challenging. Consequently, comprehensive training is crucial for developing experienced endoscopic thyroidectomy surgeons. The main goals are to provide realistic intraoperative environments for surgeons and shorten the learning curve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An animal experiment-based simulation platform has been developed in this study. Sixty trainees were equally allocated to either experimental group (surgeons received training using animal experiments before performing actual surgical procedures) or control group (surgeons participated in actual endoscopic thyroidectomy directly). Theoretical and surgical performance scores and trainees' subjective assessments were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in gender, age, and baseline theoretical scores between the two groups. Theoretical and surgical performance scores in the experiment group were significantly higher than those of the control group, including anatomy scores (P = 0.01), specialty theory scores (P < 0.01), and surgical proficiency ratings (P < 0.01). Trainees' subjective assessment scores in the experiment group were significantly higher than those in the control group, including satisfaction with the teaching program (P < 0.01), perceived enjoyment of learning (P < 0.01), proactive learning behavior (P < 0.01), self-assessed theoretical knowledge acquisition (P = 0.04), and self-reported improvement in operational skills (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The utilization of animal experiment-based simulation surgery platform has a positive impact on increasing trainees' engagement in surgical learning and enhancing the outcomes of training program.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"1325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07935-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic thyroidectomy, due to its superior cosmetic outcomes and improved postoperative quality of life, is increasingly in demand, especially among young female patients. However, performing the procedure while protecting crucial structures such as parathyroid glands and laryngeal nerves remains challenging. Consequently, comprehensive training is crucial for developing experienced endoscopic thyroidectomy surgeons. The main goals are to provide realistic intraoperative environments for surgeons and shorten the learning curve.

Methods: An animal experiment-based simulation platform has been developed in this study. Sixty trainees were equally allocated to either experimental group (surgeons received training using animal experiments before performing actual surgical procedures) or control group (surgeons participated in actual endoscopic thyroidectomy directly). Theoretical and surgical performance scores and trainees' subjective assessments were compared between the two groups.

Results: There was no significant difference in gender, age, and baseline theoretical scores between the two groups. Theoretical and surgical performance scores in the experiment group were significantly higher than those of the control group, including anatomy scores (P = 0.01), specialty theory scores (P < 0.01), and surgical proficiency ratings (P < 0.01). Trainees' subjective assessment scores in the experiment group were significantly higher than those in the control group, including satisfaction with the teaching program (P < 0.01), perceived enjoyment of learning (P < 0.01), proactive learning behavior (P < 0.01), self-assessed theoretical knowledge acquisition (P = 0.04), and self-reported improvement in operational skills (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: The utilization of animal experiment-based simulation surgery platform has a positive impact on increasing trainees' engagement in surgical learning and enhancing the outcomes of training program.

Abstract Image

基于动物实验的模拟手术平台在内镜甲状腺切除术教学中的应用初探。
背景:内窥镜甲状腺切除术,由于其良好的美容效果和术后生活质量的改善,越来越多的需求,特别是在年轻女性患者中。然而,在保护甲状旁腺和喉神经等关键结构的同时进行手术仍然具有挑战性。因此,全面的培训对于培养有经验的内窥镜甲状腺切除术医生是至关重要的。主要目标是为外科医生提供真实的术中环境,缩短学习曲线。方法:建立基于动物实验的模拟实验平台。60名学员被平均分配到实验组(外科医生在实际手术前接受动物实验培训)和对照组(外科医生直接参与实际的内镜甲状腺切除术)。比较两组患者的理论和手术表现评分以及受训者的主观评价。结果:两组患者在性别、年龄和基线理论评分方面无显著差异。实验组的理论和手术成绩得分均显著高于对照组,包括解剖学得分(P = 0.01)、专业理论得分(P)。结论:利用基于动物实验的模拟手术平台对提高学员的外科学习参与度和提高培训效果有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信