Discovering the Freud wars: Henri F. Ellenberger and the polarized history of psychotherapy in France (circa 1970).

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Elsa Forner, Rémy Amouroux, Milana Aronov, Florent Serina
{"title":"Discovering the Freud wars: Henri F. Ellenberger and the polarized history of psychotherapy in France (circa 1970).","authors":"Elsa Forner, Rémy Amouroux, Milana Aronov, Florent Serina","doi":"10.1037/hop0000281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The text examines the reception in France of the work of Henri F. Ellenberger, a psychiatrist and historian and the author of <i>The Discovery of the Unconscious</i> (1970). In this book, Ellenberger offers a non-Freudian history of dynamic psychiatry, highlighting contributions by Janet, Adler, and Jung to develop a more pluralistic view of psychotherapeutic practices. In the 1970s, France remained strongly dominated by psychoanalysis, while other countries increasingly adopted approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapy. This Freudian hegemony explains the resistance Ellenberger encountered in having his book translated into French. Despite his connections with prominent psychiatrists, his initial attempts failed. It was ultimately through the magazine <i>Psychologie</i>-founded by Jacques Mousseau and inspired by <i>Psychology Today</i>-that Ellenberger found a platform for his ideas, leading to the French publication of his book in 1974. The text emphasizes that the mixed reception of Ellenberger's work reflects a broader divide between therapeutic models. In the United States, his book fueled a critical reevaluation of psychoanalysis, while in France his contribution was often minimized or reframed to fit within the Freudian tradition. The article links these dynamics to deeper ideological polarization and the influence of institutional networks in defining what counts as legitimate therapeutic knowledge. Ultimately, the study concludes that Ellenberger, as both an intellectual and geographical outsider, represents a pivotal moment for thinking about therapeutic and historiographical pluralism-an approach that France struggled to embrace for decades. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"28 3","pages":"198-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The text examines the reception in France of the work of Henri F. Ellenberger, a psychiatrist and historian and the author of The Discovery of the Unconscious (1970). In this book, Ellenberger offers a non-Freudian history of dynamic psychiatry, highlighting contributions by Janet, Adler, and Jung to develop a more pluralistic view of psychotherapeutic practices. In the 1970s, France remained strongly dominated by psychoanalysis, while other countries increasingly adopted approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapy. This Freudian hegemony explains the resistance Ellenberger encountered in having his book translated into French. Despite his connections with prominent psychiatrists, his initial attempts failed. It was ultimately through the magazine Psychologie-founded by Jacques Mousseau and inspired by Psychology Today-that Ellenberger found a platform for his ideas, leading to the French publication of his book in 1974. The text emphasizes that the mixed reception of Ellenberger's work reflects a broader divide between therapeutic models. In the United States, his book fueled a critical reevaluation of psychoanalysis, while in France his contribution was often minimized or reframed to fit within the Freudian tradition. The article links these dynamics to deeper ideological polarization and the influence of institutional networks in defining what counts as legitimate therapeutic knowledge. Ultimately, the study concludes that Ellenberger, as both an intellectual and geographical outsider, represents a pivotal moment for thinking about therapeutic and historiographical pluralism-an approach that France struggled to embrace for decades. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

发现弗洛伊德之战:亨利·f·艾伦伯格和法国心理治疗的两极化历史(大约1970年)。
本文考察了精神病学家、历史学家、《无意识的发现》(1970)的作者亨利·f·埃伦伯格的作品在法国的接受情况。在这本书中,艾伦伯格提供了一个非弗洛伊德的动态精神病学历史,突出了珍妮特、阿德勒和荣格对精神治疗实践的多元观点的贡献。在20世纪70年代,法国仍然以精神分析为主导,而其他国家则越来越多地采用认知行为疗法等方法。这种弗洛伊德式的霸权解释了埃伦伯格在将他的书翻译成法语时遇到的阻力。尽管他与著名的精神科医生有联系,但他最初的尝试失败了。最终,通过《心理学》杂志(由雅克·穆索创办,受《今日心理学》启发),艾伦伯格为自己的观点找到了一个平台,并于1974年在法国出版了他的书。文章强调,人们对Ellenberger的工作褒贬不一,反映出治疗模式之间存在着更广泛的分歧。在美国,他的书推动了对精神分析的批判性重新评估,而在法国,他的贡献往往被最小化或重新定义,以适应弗洛伊德的传统。文章将这些动态与更深层次的意识形态两极分化和机构网络在定义什么是合法治疗知识方面的影响联系起来。最后,该研究得出结论,作为一个知识和地理上的局外人,艾伦伯格代表了一个思考治疗和历史多元主义的关键时刻——这是法国几十年来努力接受的一种方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: History of Psychology features refereed articles addressing all aspects of psychology"s past and of its interrelationship with the many contexts within which it has emerged and has been practiced. It also publishes scholarly work in closely related areas, such as historical psychology (the history of consciousness and behavior), psychohistory, theory in psychology as it pertains to history, historiography, biography and autobiography, and the teaching of the history of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信