Claudio Ucciferri, Alessandro Di Gasbarro, Jacopo Vecchiet, Katia Falasca
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of deflazacort in diabetic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2.","authors":"Claudio Ucciferri, Alessandro Di Gasbarro, Jacopo Vecchiet, Katia Falasca","doi":"10.5826/mrm.2025.1035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different therapies are recommended for the management of COVID-19 at home, use of steroids is the reference for the home management of COVID-19 in second phase of the disease. Several steroids are recommended in the treatment of COVID-19; however, the use of steroids is known to bring to problems in the management of diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study, conducted with the aim of evaluating the efficacy and safety of the administration of deflazacort in diabetic outpatients infected with SARS-CoV-2, versus standard use of dexamethasone/methylprednisolone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 patients were enrolled: 15 in the \"deflazacort\" group and 48 in the \" dexamethasone/-methylprednisolone \" group. The study population was 49.2% male with a median age of 63.6 years (IQR 54.5-71.0). 44 (69.8%) patients had at least one comorbidity in addition to diabetes. A total of 4 (6.3%) patients (50% females) required hospital care for glycaemic decompensation, all in the dexamethasone/methylprednisolone group (0 vs 4 p=0.019). Hospitalization occurred in 19 (30.1%) for respiratory failure related to SARS-CoV-2 infection: 5 in the deflazacort group, 14 in the dexamethasone/methylprednisolone group (p=0.76) The mean number of days between illness onset and the first negative swab was 28.4 days in the deflazacort group and 27.4 days in the dexamethasone/methylprednisolone group (p=0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deflazacort demonstrated a lower incidence of hospital admission for glycaemic decompensation compared to standard treatment with dexamethasone/methylprednisolone in SARS-CoV-2 positive outpatients. There were no differences in COVID-19-related hospitalizations between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":51135,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/mrm.2025.1035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Different therapies are recommended for the management of COVID-19 at home, use of steroids is the reference for the home management of COVID-19 in second phase of the disease. Several steroids are recommended in the treatment of COVID-19; however, the use of steroids is known to bring to problems in the management of diabetic patients.
Methods: This is a retrospective observational study, conducted with the aim of evaluating the efficacy and safety of the administration of deflazacort in diabetic outpatients infected with SARS-CoV-2, versus standard use of dexamethasone/methylprednisolone.
Results: A total of 63 patients were enrolled: 15 in the "deflazacort" group and 48 in the " dexamethasone/-methylprednisolone " group. The study population was 49.2% male with a median age of 63.6 years (IQR 54.5-71.0). 44 (69.8%) patients had at least one comorbidity in addition to diabetes. A total of 4 (6.3%) patients (50% females) required hospital care for glycaemic decompensation, all in the dexamethasone/methylprednisolone group (0 vs 4 p=0.019). Hospitalization occurred in 19 (30.1%) for respiratory failure related to SARS-CoV-2 infection: 5 in the deflazacort group, 14 in the dexamethasone/methylprednisolone group (p=0.76) The mean number of days between illness onset and the first negative swab was 28.4 days in the deflazacort group and 27.4 days in the dexamethasone/methylprednisolone group (p=0.40).
Conclusion: Deflazacort demonstrated a lower incidence of hospital admission for glycaemic decompensation compared to standard treatment with dexamethasone/methylprednisolone in SARS-CoV-2 positive outpatients. There were no differences in COVID-19-related hospitalizations between the two groups.
背景:COVID-19的家庭管理推荐不同的治疗方法,类固醇的使用是COVID-19第二阶段疾病家庭管理的参考。推荐使用几种类固醇治疗COVID-19;然而,已知使用类固醇会给糖尿病患者的管理带来问题。方法:本研究是一项回顾性观察性研究,目的是评估地塞米松/甲基强的松龙对感染SARS-CoV-2的糖尿病门诊患者给予地拉法柯与标准使用地塞米松/甲泼尼龙的疗效和安全性。结果:共纳入63例患者:“地拉法柯”组15例,“地塞米松/-甲基强的松龙”组48例。研究人群中男性占49.2%,中位年龄为63.6岁(IQR为54.5-71.0)。44例(69.8%)患者除糖尿病外至少有一种合并症。共有4例(6.3%)患者(50%为女性)因血糖失代偿需要住院治疗,均为地塞米松/甲基强的松龙组(0 vs 4 p=0.019)。因SARS-CoV-2感染相关呼吸衰竭住院19例(30.1%):地拉沙柯组5例,地塞米松/甲基强的松龙组14例(p=0.76)。地拉沙柯组发病至首次拭子阴性的平均天数为28.4天,地塞米松/甲基强的松龙组27.4天(p=0.40)。结论:在SARS-CoV-2阳性门诊患者中,与地塞米松/甲基强的松龙标准治疗相比,地拉法柯因血糖失代偿住院的发生率较低。两组之间与covid -19相关的住院治疗没有差异。
期刊介绍:
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research.
The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.