Reciprocal effects of programmed cell death on fitness in unicellular endosymbiotic Chlorella and its ciliate host.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Santosh Sathe, Lutz Becks
{"title":"Reciprocal effects of programmed cell death on fitness in unicellular endosymbiotic Chlorella and its ciliate host.","authors":"Santosh Sathe, Lutz Becks","doi":"10.1093/jeb/voaf119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Programmed cell death (PCD), the genetically controlled active cellular suicide mechanism in multicellular organisms, also exists in unicellular organisms. However, explaining the evolution of PCD by natural selection in these organisms remains a challenge. PCD likely emerged during early endosymbiotic events as an initial antagonistic adaptation, enabling unicellular parasitic proto-endosymbionts to exploit their hosts, for example, by triggering host death in response to nutrient depletion or releasing offspring. Over time, during endosymbiont domestication and, as proposed, through horizontal gene transfer from endosymbionts to the host, PCD evolved in the host, providing benefits to both the host and the endosymbionts. However, the underlying assumption of this hypothesis, that PCD benefits and non-PCD (necrosis) harms the endosymbionts and/or the host, remains untested. Here, we investigated the fitness consequences of heat-shock-induced PCD in the endosymbiotic chlorophyte Chlorella variabilis and its facultative symbiotic ciliate host Paramecium bursaria, the non-symbiotic C. sorokiniana, and the predatory host P. duboscqui. Heat-shock triggered PCD in C. variabilis and the two ciliate species, causing significant fitness consequences. The supernatant from C. variabilis PCD enhanced the growth of its own clones and endosymbiotic host while inhibiting the growth of the predatory host. The supernatants from necrotic C. variabilis reduced growth of both Chlorella and Paramecium. Similarly, PCD in the symbiotic Paramecium host benefited Chlorella, whereas PCD and necrosis in the predatory Paramecium host were detrimental. These results expand the understanding of unicellular PCD, highlighting its dual role in benefiting clonal populations and their specific endosymbiotic partners, thereby affecting endosymbiosis evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeb/voaf119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD), the genetically controlled active cellular suicide mechanism in multicellular organisms, also exists in unicellular organisms. However, explaining the evolution of PCD by natural selection in these organisms remains a challenge. PCD likely emerged during early endosymbiotic events as an initial antagonistic adaptation, enabling unicellular parasitic proto-endosymbionts to exploit their hosts, for example, by triggering host death in response to nutrient depletion or releasing offspring. Over time, during endosymbiont domestication and, as proposed, through horizontal gene transfer from endosymbionts to the host, PCD evolved in the host, providing benefits to both the host and the endosymbionts. However, the underlying assumption of this hypothesis, that PCD benefits and non-PCD (necrosis) harms the endosymbionts and/or the host, remains untested. Here, we investigated the fitness consequences of heat-shock-induced PCD in the endosymbiotic chlorophyte Chlorella variabilis and its facultative symbiotic ciliate host Paramecium bursaria, the non-symbiotic C. sorokiniana, and the predatory host P. duboscqui. Heat-shock triggered PCD in C. variabilis and the two ciliate species, causing significant fitness consequences. The supernatant from C. variabilis PCD enhanced the growth of its own clones and endosymbiotic host while inhibiting the growth of the predatory host. The supernatants from necrotic C. variabilis reduced growth of both Chlorella and Paramecium. Similarly, PCD in the symbiotic Paramecium host benefited Chlorella, whereas PCD and necrosis in the predatory Paramecium host were detrimental. These results expand the understanding of unicellular PCD, highlighting its dual role in benefiting clonal populations and their specific endosymbiotic partners, thereby affecting endosymbiosis evolution.

细胞程序性死亡对单细胞内共生小球藻及其纤毛虫宿主适合度的相互影响。
细胞程序性死亡(PCD)是多细胞生物中遗传控制的主动细胞自杀机制,也存在于单细胞生物中。然而,通过自然选择解释PCD在这些生物中的进化仍然是一个挑战。PCD可能出现在早期内共生事件中,作为一种初始的拮抗适应,使单细胞寄生原内共生生物能够利用它们的宿主,例如,通过触发宿主因营养耗尽而死亡或释放后代。随着时间的推移,在内共生体驯化过程中,正如所提出的那样,通过内共生体向宿主的水平基因转移,PCD在宿主中进化,为宿主和内共生体提供了好处。然而,该假说的基本假设,即PCD有益而非PCD(坏死)损害内共生体和/或宿主,仍未得到验证。本文研究了热休克诱导的PCD对内共生绿藻小球藻及其兼性共生纤毛虫宿主法氏草履虫、非共生C. sorokiniana和掠食性宿主P. duboscqui的适应性影响。热休克触发了变毛线虫和两种纤毛虫的PCD,造成了显著的适应性后果。变异弧菌PCD上清液对其自身无性系和内共生寄主的生长有促进作用,对掠食性寄主的生长有抑制作用。坏死变胞梭菌的上清液降低了小球藻和草履虫的生长。同样,共生草履虫宿主的PCD对小球藻有益,而掠食性草履虫宿主的PCD和坏死则有害。这些结果扩大了对单细胞PCD的理解,突出了它在有益于克隆群体及其特定的内共生伙伴方面的双重作用,从而影响了内共生进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
152
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It covers both micro- and macro-evolution of all types of organisms. The aim of the Journal is to integrate perspectives across molecular and microbial evolution, behaviour, genetics, ecology, life histories, development, palaeontology, systematics and morphology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信