The Virtual Interview and Physician Assistant/Associate Program Diversity.

Q2 Health Professions
Lynn Timko-Swaim, Carina Loscalzo, Gina Pontrelli, Shannan Ricoy, Hants Williams, Kindred Shulgin
{"title":"The Virtual Interview and Physician Assistant/Associate Program Diversity.","authors":"Lynn Timko-Swaim, Carina Loscalzo, Gina Pontrelli, Shannan Ricoy, Hants Williams, Kindred Shulgin","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Creating a diversified health care workforce can improve equity, patient experiences, and outcomes. Achieving this goal begins with the recruitment of diverse applicants to health professional education programs. The purpose of this study was to compare diversity characteristics of applicants interviewed either virtually or in-person for physician assistant/associate education programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive and inferential analysis of admissions data from 3 New York-based programs that changed from an in-person interview format (interview cycles 2017, 2018, and 2019) to virtual format (interview cycles 2020, 2021, and 2022) were used in this study. Primary demographic data, focusing on race and ethnicity, were analyzed across several admission stages. Data were analyzed at each stage to explore differences in applicant success throughout the admission process (ie, verified applicants, interviewed, accepted, matriculated).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the virtual interview period, the number of underrepresented in medicine (URiM), non-White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic applicants increased significantly while the number of White applicants decreased significantly. Significant increases were noted in the numbers of URiM, non-White, and Asian applicants interviewed as well as the number of non-White and Asians accepted. Among matriculated students, the total number of URiM, non-White, Asian, and Hispanic students showed an upward trend.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>More research is needed to understand the potential relationships between the applicant pool diversity and interview format and interview stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Creating a diversified health care workforce can improve equity, patient experiences, and outcomes. Achieving this goal begins with the recruitment of diverse applicants to health professional education programs. The purpose of this study was to compare diversity characteristics of applicants interviewed either virtually or in-person for physician assistant/associate education programs.

Methods: Descriptive and inferential analysis of admissions data from 3 New York-based programs that changed from an in-person interview format (interview cycles 2017, 2018, and 2019) to virtual format (interview cycles 2020, 2021, and 2022) were used in this study. Primary demographic data, focusing on race and ethnicity, were analyzed across several admission stages. Data were analyzed at each stage to explore differences in applicant success throughout the admission process (ie, verified applicants, interviewed, accepted, matriculated).

Results: During the virtual interview period, the number of underrepresented in medicine (URiM), non-White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic applicants increased significantly while the number of White applicants decreased significantly. Significant increases were noted in the numbers of URiM, non-White, and Asian applicants interviewed as well as the number of non-White and Asians accepted. Among matriculated students, the total number of URiM, non-White, Asian, and Hispanic students showed an upward trend.

Discussion: More research is needed to understand the potential relationships between the applicant pool diversity and interview format and interview stage.

虚拟面试和医师助理/助理项目多样性。
简介:创建多元化的医疗保健队伍可以改善公平性、患者体验和结果。要实现这一目标,首先要招募各种各样的申请者参加卫生专业教育项目。本研究的目的是比较医师助理/副医师教育项目的申请者的多样性特征,无论是虚拟面试还是面对面面试。方法:在本研究中,对来自3个纽约项目的招生数据进行了描述性和推理分析,这些项目从面对面面试形式(面试周期为2017年、2018年和2019年)转变为虚拟面试形式(面试周期为2020年、2021年和2022年)。主要人口统计数据,重点是种族和民族,在几个入学阶段进行了分析。我们对每个阶段的数据进行了分析,以探讨申请人在整个录取过程中的成功差异(即,核实申请人,面试,接受,录取)。结果:在虚拟面试期间,医学领域(URiM)、非白人、黑人、亚洲人和西班牙裔申请人的数量显著增加,而白人申请人的数量显著减少。在接受面试的非白人和亚洲申请人的数量以及被录取的非白人和亚洲人的数量上都有显著的增加。在被录取的学生中,非白人、亚裔和西班牙裔学生的总数呈上升趋势。讨论:应聘者群体多样性与面试形式和面试阶段之间的潜在关系有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信