Alpha-delta ratio as a robust marker of the impact of cerebral blood flow on EEG signal during general anesthesia.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Elsa Manquat, Fabrice Vallée, Etienne Gayat, David Sabbagh, Melvin Berto-Strouc, Jona Joachim, Jérôme Cartailler, Alexandre Gramfort
{"title":"Alpha-delta ratio as a robust marker of the impact of cerebral blood flow on EEG signal during general anesthesia.","authors":"Elsa Manquat, Fabrice Vallée, Etienne Gayat, David Sabbagh, Melvin Berto-Strouc, Jona Joachim, Jérôme Cartailler, Alexandre Gramfort","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the impact of cerebral blood flow (CBF) on electroencephalography (EEG) during general anesthesia (GA) in neuroradiology procedures and described the pressure-flow relationship during increasing and decreasing mean arterial pressure changes (mAP) challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 63 patients (aged 45 [32-53] years, 73 % women) who had EEG, mAP, and CBF monitored during stabilized GA. CBF was approximated by the mean blood velocity in the mean cerebral artery (MCAv<sub>mean</sub>), measured by transcranial Doppler. We analyzed the alpha-delta ratio (ADR) to validate that the EEG signal under general anesthesia is influenced by CBF by demonstrating a significant association between MCAv<sub>mean</sub> changes caused by an mAP challenge and intraoperative EEG parameters. Secondary objectives include (1) an evaluation of response delays between CBF and ADR correlation; (2) characterizing the relationship between CBFv and mAP by comparing linear regression coefficients between increasing and decreasing mAP challenges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>mAP challenges lasted for a median duration of 410[220-585] seconds. We found a significant linear relationship between MCAv<sub>mean</sub> changes and alpha-delta ratio, with the strongest association found for a time delay between 4' and 9'30 s (permutation test). Our results show directional sensitivity of the cerebral pressure-flow relationship, with asymmetric responses to positive and negative mAP challenges across the cohort (0.28 [0.12 -0.37] and 0.38 [0.25 -0.74] respectively, p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ADR appears to be a delayed marker for studying the relationship between CBF and intraoperative EEG. We observed asymmetry in the cerebral pressure-flow relationship during increasing and decreasing mAP challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101636"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the impact of cerebral blood flow (CBF) on electroencephalography (EEG) during general anesthesia (GA) in neuroradiology procedures and described the pressure-flow relationship during increasing and decreasing mean arterial pressure changes (mAP) challenges.

Methods: Data were collected from 63 patients (aged 45 [32-53] years, 73 % women) who had EEG, mAP, and CBF monitored during stabilized GA. CBF was approximated by the mean blood velocity in the mean cerebral artery (MCAvmean), measured by transcranial Doppler. We analyzed the alpha-delta ratio (ADR) to validate that the EEG signal under general anesthesia is influenced by CBF by demonstrating a significant association between MCAvmean changes caused by an mAP challenge and intraoperative EEG parameters. Secondary objectives include (1) an evaluation of response delays between CBF and ADR correlation; (2) characterizing the relationship between CBFv and mAP by comparing linear regression coefficients between increasing and decreasing mAP challenges.

Results: mAP challenges lasted for a median duration of 410[220-585] seconds. We found a significant linear relationship between MCAvmean changes and alpha-delta ratio, with the strongest association found for a time delay between 4' and 9'30 s (permutation test). Our results show directional sensitivity of the cerebral pressure-flow relationship, with asymmetric responses to positive and negative mAP challenges across the cohort (0.28 [0.12 -0.37] and 0.38 [0.25 -0.74] respectively, p = 0.004).

Conclusion: The ADR appears to be a delayed marker for studying the relationship between CBF and intraoperative EEG. We observed asymmetry in the cerebral pressure-flow relationship during increasing and decreasing mAP challenges.

α - δ比值作为全麻时脑血流对脑电图信号影响的可靠指标。
背景:本研究探讨了神经放射学全麻(GA)过程中脑血流量(CBF)对脑电图(EEG)的影响,并描述了平均动脉压变化(mAP)升高和降低挑战时的压力-流量关系。方法:收集63例患者(年龄45[32-53]岁,73%为女性)的数据,在稳定的GA期间监测EEG, mAP和CBF。CBF由经颅多普勒测量的平均脑动脉平均血流速度(MCAvmean)近似计算。我们通过分析α - δ比(ADR)来验证全身麻醉下脑电图信号受到脑血流的影响,证明mAP刺激引起的MCAvmean变化与术中脑电图参数之间存在显著关联。次要目标包括(1)评估CBF与ADR相关性之间的反应延迟;(2)通过比较mAP挑战增加和减少的线性回归系数,表征CBFv与mAP之间的关系。结果:mAP挑战持续的中位时间为410[220-585]秒。我们发现MCAvmean变化与α - δ比值之间存在显著的线性关系,其中在4‘和9’30 s之间的时间延迟中发现了最强的关联(排列检验)。我们的研究结果显示了脑压力-血流关系的定向敏感性,在整个队列中对正、负mAP挑战的反应不对称(分别为0.28[0.12 -0.37]和0.38 [0.25 -0.74],p = 0.004)。结论:不良反应可能是研究脑血流与术中脑电图关系的滞后标志。我们观察到在增加和减少mAP挑战时脑压力-流量关系的不对称性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信