Policy and preference: the intersection of attendance hurdles and student perceptions of practical classes.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Karen J Donald, Anthea Cochrane, Samantha Byrne, Lisa Cheshire, Jessica Stander, Tamara Clements, Sue Finch, Nicole Hill, Elaina Kefalianos, Jessica Lees, Miki Maruyama, Lauren Story, Bronwyn Tarrant, Debra Virtue, Travis Haber
{"title":"Policy and preference: the intersection of attendance hurdles and student perceptions of practical classes.","authors":"Karen J Donald, Anthea Cochrane, Samantha Byrne, Lisa Cheshire, Jessica Stander, Tamara Clements, Sue Finch, Nicole Hill, Elaina Kefalianos, Jessica Lees, Miki Maruyama, Lauren Story, Bronwyn Tarrant, Debra Virtue, Travis Haber","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07909-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practical classes and skills labs, where students learn, practice, and demonstrate key professional and technical skills, are essential in health professional education. As such, attendance at practical classes has historically been mandated and, in some cases, an \"attendance hurdle\" (i.e., mandatory minimum attendance requirement that students must meet to pass the course) is applied to subjects where practical classes are a core part of the curriculum. We aimed to explore students' attitudes, beliefs and experiences of attendance hurdles for practical classes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed students from entry-to-practice programs in Medicine, Dentistry, Oral Health, Optometry, Physiotherapy, Social Work, Nursing, and Speech Pathology who were currently or previously enrolled in a subject/s with attendance hurdles for practical classes. In a single online survey, students answered multiple-choice, ranking, and Likert questions about their attitudes, beliefs, and experiences of attendance hurdles for practical classes. Data were analysed descriptively and with Pearson chi-squared test of association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three percent (n=362) of 575 students who completed the survey wanted to maintain attendance hurdles. In contrast, almost 80% of students stated they would attend 80% or more of classes without attendance hurdles. Many students believed that attendance hurdles could adversely affect some individuals (e.g., due to personal circumstances and sociodemographics), and half believed as adult learners, they should decide whether to attend practical classes. Students valued the in-class tutor feedback and application to clinical practice that practical classes offered. Students suggested that greater flexibility in the timing of practical classes would be more likely than hurdles to improve attendance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The advantages of participating in practical classes to develop essential clinical skills are evident to students, and likely motivate them to attend most scheduled classes. Numerous factors can lead to student absences, and mandating attendance may disadvantage some students. Alternatives to attendance policies could include offering scheduling flexibility and student sign-up, accommodating students' personal and health needs, and aligning classes to student values.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"1329"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07909-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Practical classes and skills labs, where students learn, practice, and demonstrate key professional and technical skills, are essential in health professional education. As such, attendance at practical classes has historically been mandated and, in some cases, an "attendance hurdle" (i.e., mandatory minimum attendance requirement that students must meet to pass the course) is applied to subjects where practical classes are a core part of the curriculum. We aimed to explore students' attitudes, beliefs and experiences of attendance hurdles for practical classes.

Methods: We surveyed students from entry-to-practice programs in Medicine, Dentistry, Oral Health, Optometry, Physiotherapy, Social Work, Nursing, and Speech Pathology who were currently or previously enrolled in a subject/s with attendance hurdles for practical classes. In a single online survey, students answered multiple-choice, ranking, and Likert questions about their attitudes, beliefs, and experiences of attendance hurdles for practical classes. Data were analysed descriptively and with Pearson chi-squared test of association.

Results: Sixty-three percent (n=362) of 575 students who completed the survey wanted to maintain attendance hurdles. In contrast, almost 80% of students stated they would attend 80% or more of classes without attendance hurdles. Many students believed that attendance hurdles could adversely affect some individuals (e.g., due to personal circumstances and sociodemographics), and half believed as adult learners, they should decide whether to attend practical classes. Students valued the in-class tutor feedback and application to clinical practice that practical classes offered. Students suggested that greater flexibility in the timing of practical classes would be more likely than hurdles to improve attendance.

Conclusions: The advantages of participating in practical classes to develop essential clinical skills are evident to students, and likely motivate them to attend most scheduled classes. Numerous factors can lead to student absences, and mandating attendance may disadvantage some students. Alternatives to attendance policies could include offering scheduling flexibility and student sign-up, accommodating students' personal and health needs, and aligning classes to student values.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

政策与偏好:出勤障碍与学生对实践课程认知的交集。
背景:实践课程和技能实验室是学生学习、实践和展示关键专业和技术技能的地方,是卫生专业教育必不可少的。因此,实践课的出勤率历来是强制性的,在某些情况下,“出勤率障碍”(即学生必须达到通过课程的强制性最低出勤率要求)适用于实践课是课程核心部分的科目。我们的目的是探讨学生的态度,信念和经验出席障碍的实践课程。方法:我们调查了来自医学、牙科、口腔健康、验光、物理治疗、社会工作、护理和语言病理学等专业的学生,他们目前或以前注册了一个有出勤障碍的实用课程。在一项在线调查中,学生们回答了多项选择题、排名题和李克特题,内容涉及他们对实践课程出勤障碍的态度、信念和经历。对数据进行描述性分析,并采用Pearson卡方关联检验。结果:在完成调查的575名学生中,有63% (n=362)的人希望维持出勤率。相比之下,近80%的学生表示他们会在没有出勤障碍的情况下参加80%或更多的课程。许多学生认为出勤障碍可能会对一些人产生不利影响(例如,由于个人情况和社会人口统计学),一半的学生认为,作为成年学习者,他们应该决定是否参加实践课程。学生们重视课堂上导师的反馈和实践课程的临床应用。学生们表示,在实践课程的时间上更灵活,比设置障碍更有可能提高出勤率。结论:参加实践课程发展基本临床技能的优势对学生来说是显而易见的,并可能激励他们参加大多数预定的课程。许多因素会导致学生缺课,强制出勤可能会对一些学生不利。出勤政策的替代方案可能包括提供灵活的日程安排和学生注册,满足学生的个人和健康需求,并使课程与学生的价值观保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信