Patrick L Stafford, Robert Roth, John Ferguson, Kenneth C Bilchick, Andrew E Darby, Sula Mazimba, Nishaki Mehta, Eric M Davis, Heather Bonner, Yeilim Cho, Jeongok Logan, Michelle Sobremonte-King, Younghoon Kwon
{"title":"Multi setting evaluation of Watch-PAT in obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis in patients with atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Patrick L Stafford, Robert Roth, John Ferguson, Kenneth C Bilchick, Andrew E Darby, Sula Mazimba, Nishaki Mehta, Eric M Davis, Heather Bonner, Yeilim Cho, Jeongok Logan, Michelle Sobremonte-King, Younghoon Kwon","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have elevated risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT)-based device, the Watch-PAT (WP) has been increasingly used as a home OSA test. We conducted a multi-setting evaluation of WP in OSA diagnosis by comparing results from in-lab PSG, in-lab WP, and home WP in AF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AF patients underwent an in-lab PSG with concurrent in-lab WP and two consecutive nights of home WP. OSA was categorized into no OSA, mild, moderate, and severe OSA by apnea hypopnea index (AHI; <5, ≥5-<15, ≥15-<29, ≥30). The primary outcome was OSA severity agreement between in-lab PSG vs. home WP. Secondary outcomes included the agreement between in-lab PSG vs. in-lab WP, as well as in-lab WP vs. home WP. Night-to-night variability of consecutive nights of home WP was also evaluated. Results were expressed by Cohen's Kappa (κ) for AHI scoring rules 1a and 1b.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27 patients were included for analysis. There was slight and fair agreement between in-lab PSG and home WP (κ=0.15, 0.40 for score rule 1a and 1b, respectively), substantial agreement between in-lab PSG vs. in-lab WP (κ=0.63, 0.71), moderate agreement between in-lab WP and home WP (κ=0.59, 0.59), and almost perfect agreement between first night home WP and second night home WP (κ=0.87, 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate overall slight to fair agreement between home WP vs. in-lab PSG, suggesting inadequate performance against the standard reference test. This should be considered when interpreting the results of home WP. Other evaluations demonstrated moderate agreement for in-lab WP and home WP in the classification of OSA severity, substantial agreement between in-lab PSG and in-lab WP, and almost perfect agreement in the comparison both home WP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objectives: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have elevated risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT)-based device, the Watch-PAT (WP) has been increasingly used as a home OSA test. We conducted a multi-setting evaluation of WP in OSA diagnosis by comparing results from in-lab PSG, in-lab WP, and home WP in AF patients.
Methods: AF patients underwent an in-lab PSG with concurrent in-lab WP and two consecutive nights of home WP. OSA was categorized into no OSA, mild, moderate, and severe OSA by apnea hypopnea index (AHI; <5, ≥5-<15, ≥15-<29, ≥30). The primary outcome was OSA severity agreement between in-lab PSG vs. home WP. Secondary outcomes included the agreement between in-lab PSG vs. in-lab WP, as well as in-lab WP vs. home WP. Night-to-night variability of consecutive nights of home WP was also evaluated. Results were expressed by Cohen's Kappa (κ) for AHI scoring rules 1a and 1b.
Results: 27 patients were included for analysis. There was slight and fair agreement between in-lab PSG and home WP (κ=0.15, 0.40 for score rule 1a and 1b, respectively), substantial agreement between in-lab PSG vs. in-lab WP (κ=0.63, 0.71), moderate agreement between in-lab WP and home WP (κ=0.59, 0.59), and almost perfect agreement between first night home WP and second night home WP (κ=0.87, 0.89).
Conclusions: We demonstrate overall slight to fair agreement between home WP vs. in-lab PSG, suggesting inadequate performance against the standard reference test. This should be considered when interpreting the results of home WP. Other evaluations demonstrated moderate agreement for in-lab WP and home WP in the classification of OSA severity, substantial agreement between in-lab PSG and in-lab WP, and almost perfect agreement in the comparison both home WP.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.